Is patient-specific pre-operative preparation feasible in a clinical environment? A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Chopra S, Satkunasivam R, Kundavaram C, Liang G, Gill IS. Outlining the limits of partial nephrectomy. Transl Androl Urol. 2015;4(3):294–300.
   Google Scholar
• Hou W, Yan W, Ji Z. Anatomic features involved in technical complexity of partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2015;85(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Kim YW, Kim NK, Hur H, Lee K, Min BS, et al. Pelvic anatomy as a factor in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011;21(5):334–9.
   Google Scholar
• Martel G, Al-Suhaibani Y, Moloo H, Haggar F, Friedlich M, Mamazza J, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy and anastomotic leak after tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(8):1195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Polewczyk A, Kutarski A, Czekajska-Chehab E, Adamczyk P, Boczar K, Polewczyk M, et al. Complications of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with persistent left superior vena cava. Cardiol J. 2014;21(2):128–37.
   Google Scholar
• Vivek MA, Augustine AJ, Rao R. A comprehensive predictive scoring method for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(2):62–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tepper OM, Sorice S, Hershman GN, Saadeh P, Levine JP, Hirsch D. Use of virtual 3-dimensional surgery in post-traumatic craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011;69(3): 733–41.
   Google Scholar
• Haq J, Patel N, Weimer K, Matthews NS. Single stage treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint using patient-specific total joint replacement and virtual surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52(4):350–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nam D, Maher PA, Rebolledo BJ, Nawabi DH, McLawhorn AS, Pearle AD. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2013;20(4):263–7.
   Google Scholar
• Furnstahl P, Vlachopoulos L, Schweizer A, Fucentese SF, Koch PP. Complex Osteotomies of Tibial Plateau Malunions Using Computer-Assisted Planning and Patient-Specific Surgical Guides. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(8):e270–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kockro RA, Serra L, Tseng-Tsai Y, Chan C, Yih-Yian S, Gim-Guan C, et al. Planning and simulation of neurosurgery in a virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(1):118–35; discussion 35-7.
   Google Scholar
• GRADE Working Group 2004 Sb, Guyatt 2008a, Guyatt 2008. The GRADE approach. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_12/12_2_1_the_grade_appro ach.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
   Google Scholar
• Adolphs N, Liu W, Keeve E, Hoffmeister B. RapidSplint: virtual splint generation for orthognathic surgery - results of a pilot series. Comput Aided Surg. 2014;19(1-3):20–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub N, Ghassemi A, Rana M, Gerressen M, Riediger D, Holzle F, et al. Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Trials. 2014;15:114.
   Google Scholar
• Derand P, Rannar LE, Hirsch JM. Imaging, virtual planning, design, and production of patient-specific implants and clinical validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2012;5(3):137–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanda J, Cooper C, Ellis D, Speculand B. Technique of temporomandibular joint replacement using a patient-specific reconstruction system in the edentulous patient. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011;49(8):618–22.
   Google Scholar
• Essig H, Rana M, Kokemueller H, von See C, Ruecker M, Tavassol F, et al. Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction - a full digital planning workflow resulting in a patient specific reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3:45.
   Google Scholar
• Gander T, Essig H, Metzler P, Lindhorst D, Dubois L, Rucker M, et al. Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(1):126–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF, Christensen AM, Lemoine JJ, Liebschner MA, et al. Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(4):728–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu SS, Gateno J, Bell RB, Hirsch DL, Markiewicz MR, Teichgraeber JF, et al. Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(1):128–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lo LJ, Chen YR, Tseng CS, Lee MY. Computer-aided reconstruction of traumatic fronto-orbital osseous defects: aesthetic considerations. Chang Gung Medical Journal. 2004;27(4):283–91.
   Google Scholar
• Perry M, Banks P, Richards R, Friedman EP, Shaw P. The use of computer-generated three-dimensional models in orbital reconstruction. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 1998;36(4):275–84.
   Google Scholar
• Schepers RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Stenekes MW, Kraeima J, Roodenburg JL, et al. Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: A new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(5):649–57.
   Google Scholar
• Scolozzi P. Maxillofacial reconstruction using polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants by "mirroring" computational planning. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2012;36(3):660–5.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbacher DM. Three-Dimensional Analysis and Surgical Planning in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(12 Suppl):S40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Christensen AM, Lasky RE, Lemoine JJ, et al. Accuracy of the computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial deformity: A pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(2):248–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Dong Y, Hu G, Xu Q. Three-dimensional reconstruction of extremity tumor regions by CT and MRI image data fusion for subject-specific preoperative assessment and planning. Comput Aided Surg. 2011;16(5):220–33.
   Google Scholar
• Fornaro J, Keel M, Harders M, Marincek B, Szekely G, Frauenfelder T. An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:50.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschi JP, Sbihi A, Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery F. 3D templating and patient-specific cutting guides (Knee-Plan) in total knee arthroplasty: postoperative CT-based assessment of implant positioning. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(6 Suppl):S281–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Li H, Qiao G, Liu H, Ji A, Ye F. Computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for acetabular fractures based on real CT data. Injury. 2011;42(10):1121–4.
   Google Scholar
• Issa K, Rifai A, McGrath MS, Callaghan JJ, Wright C, Malkani AL, et al. Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Knee Surgery. 2013;26(6):429–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kerens B, Boonen B, Schotanus M, Kort N. Patient-specific guide for revision of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: beneficial first results of a new operating technique performed on 10 patients. Acta Orthopaedica. 2013;84(2):165–9.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuwen JA, Grogaard B, Nordsletten L, Rohrl SM. Comparison of planned and achieved implant position in total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific positioning guides. Acta Orthopaedica. 2015;86(2):201–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pietsch M, Djahani O, Hochegger M, Plattner F, Hofmann S. Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty: the importance of planning by the surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2220–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer A, Furnstahl P, Nagy L. Three-dimensional correction of distal radius intra-articular malunions using patient-specific drill guides. Journal of Hand Surgery - American Volume. 2013;38(12):2339–47.
   Google Scholar
• Shen F, Chen B, Guo Q, Qi Y, Shen Y. Augmented reality patient-specific reconstruction plate design for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8(2):169–79.
   Google Scholar
• Small T, Krebs V, Molloy R, Bryan J, Klika AK, Barsoum WK. Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(5):1030–7.
   Google Scholar
• Victor J, Premanathan A. Virtual 3D planning and patient specific surgical guides for osteotomies around the knee: a feasibility and proof-of-concept study. Bone & Joint Journal. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):153–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulos L, Schweizer A, Graf M, Nagy L, Furnstahl P. Three-dimensional postoperative accuracy of extra-articular forearm osteotomies using CT-scan based patient-specific surgical guides. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:336.
   Google Scholar
• Desender L, Rancic Z, Aggarwal R, Duchateau J, Glenck M, Lachat M, et al. Patient-specific rehearsal prior to EVAR: a pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(6):639–47.
   Google Scholar
• Willaert W, Aggarwal R, Harvey K, Cochennec F, Nestel D, Darzi A, et al. Efficient implementation of patient-specific simulated rehearsal for the carotid artery stenting procedure: part-task rehearsal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(2):158–66.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu TM, Zhang Y, Wu JS, Tang WJ, Zhao Y, Pan ZG, et al. Virtual reality presurgical planning for cerebral gliomas adjacent to motor pathways in an integrated 3-D stereoscopic visualization of structural MRI and DTI tractography. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(11):1847–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hislop SJ, Hedrick JH, Singh MJ, Rhodes JM, Gillespie DL, Johansson M, et al. Simulation case rehearsals for carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(6):750–4.
   Google Scholar
• Willaert WI, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, Plessers M, Stroobant N, Nestel D, et al. Role of patient-specific virtual reality rehearsal in carotid artery stenting. Br J Surg. 2012;99(9):1304–13.
   Google Scholar
• Makiyama K, Yamanaka H, Ueno D, Ohsaka K, Sano F, Nakaigawa N, et al. Validation of a patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Urol. 2015;22(6):572–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ng I, Hwang PY, Kumar D, Lee CK, Kockro RA, Sitoh YY. Surgical planning for microsurgical excision of cerebral arterio-venous malformations using virtual reality technology. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151(5):453–63; discussion 63.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari V, Carbone M, Cappelli C, Boni L, Melfi F, Ferrari M, et al. Value of multidetector computed tomography image segmentation for preoperative planning in general surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 2012;26(3):616–26.
   Google Scholar
• Radecka E, Brehmer M, Holmgren K, Palm G, Magnusson P, Magnusson A. Pelvicaliceal biomodeling as an aid to achieving optimal access in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Endourol. 2006;20(2):92–101.
   Google Scholar
• van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A, et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S111–20.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Yang M, Xie Y, Chen Z, Wang C, Bai Y, et al. Application of the polystyrene model made by 3-D printing rapid prototyping technology for operation planning in revision lumbar discectomy. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2015;20(3):475–80.
   Google Scholar
• Leong JL, Batra PS, Citardi MJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography of the internal carotid artery for preoperative evaluation of sinonasal lesions and intraoperative surgical navigation. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(9):1618–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Xie L, Guo H, Li DP. A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(9):1379–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kanzaki M, Maeda H, Wachi N, Kikkawa T, Komine H, Isaka T, et al. Complete video-assisted thoracoscopic multi-subsegmentectomy based on patients' specific virtual 3-D pulmonary models. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013;6(2):110–5.
   Google Scholar
• Isotani S, Shimoyama H, Yokota I, China T, Hisasue S, Ide H, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of computational robot-assisted partial nephrectomy planning by virtual partial nephrectomy analysis. Int J Urol. 2015;22(5):439–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kusaka M, Sugimoto M, Fukami N, Sasaki H, Takenaka M, Anraku T, et al. Initial experience with a tailor-made simulation and navigation program using a 3-D printer model of kidney transplantation surgery. Transplantation Proceedings. 2015;47(3):596–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel M, Amorim R, Paiva W, Prudente M, Teixeira MJ, Andrade AF. 3D preoperative planning in the ER with OsiriX: when there is no time for neuronavigation. Sensors. 2013;13(5):6477–91.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Wan F, Li J, Sheng L, Li G, Chen G, et al. Flat Detector Computed Tomography-Based “Dual Vessel Fusion” Technique for Diagnosis and Surgical Planning in the Management of Dural Arteriovenous Fistula. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(2):520–7.
   Google Scholar
• Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, et al. Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(3):171–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gavazzi A, Bahsoun AN, Van Haute W, Ahmed K, Elhage O, Jaye P, et al. Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot). Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(2):152–6.
   Google Scholar
• collaboration C. Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk bias. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_8/table_8_5_a_the_cochrane_collaborations _tool_for_assessing.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wells GS, B; O'Connell, D; Peterson, J; Welch, V; Losos, M; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chan K, Bhandari M. Three-minute critical appraisal of a case series article. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(2):103–4.
   Google Scholar
• AlAli AB, Griffin MF, Butler PE. Three-Dimensional Printing Surgical Applications. Eplasty. 2015;15:e37.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt R, Deprest J, Vercauteren T, Ourselin S, David AL. Computer-assisted surgical planning and intraoperative guidance in fetal surgery: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(12):1159–66.
   Google Scholar
• See KW, Chui KH, Chan WH, Wong KC, Chan YC. Evidence for Endovascular Simulation Training: A Systematic Review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(3):441–51.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers D, Rodgers M, Woolacott N. Not only randomized controlled trials, but also case series should be considered in systematic reviews of rapidly developing technologies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(12):1253–60 e4.
   Google Scholar
• Dalziel K RA, Stein K, Garside R, Castelnuovo E, Payne L. Do the findings of case series vary significantly according to methodological characteristics? Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:iii-iv(2):1-146.
   Google Scholar
• Stein K, Dalziel K, Garside R, Castelnuovo E, Round A. Association between methodological characteristics and outcome in health technology assessments which included case series. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2005;21(3): 277–87.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves BC VK, Tsang VTC, Bennett-Lloyd BD, O'Riordan PA, editor A systematic review of case series of paediatric cardiac surgery. 8th Annual Cochrane Colloquium; 2000; Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Linde K, Scholz M, Melchart D, Willich SN. Should systematic reviews include non-randomized and uncontrolled studies? The case of acupuncture for chronic headache. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002; 55(1):77–85.
   Google Scholar
• IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF, Goeman JJ. Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015;68(8):860–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane Handbook. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org/.
   Google Scholar