Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study

References

• Roberts VI, Esler CNA, Harper WM. A 15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(11):1452–1456.
   Google Scholar
• Gøthesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, et al. Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994–2009. Bone Joint J. 2013;95–B(5):636–642.
   Google Scholar
• Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(3):397.
   Google Scholar
• Parratte S, Pagnano M, Trousdale RT, et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143–2149.
   Google Scholar
• Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, et al. The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(7):1031–1039.
   Google Scholar
• Nizard R. Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;68(3):215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(5):682–687.
   Google Scholar
• Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(1):77–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop. 1994;299:153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 1991;73–B(5):709–714.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, et al. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8(4):419–426.
   Google Scholar
• Stucinskas J, Robertsson O, Sirka A, et al. Moderate varus/valgus malalignment after total knee arthroplasty has little effect on knee function or muscle strength. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(6):728–733.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, et al. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2004;86–B(6):818–823.
   Google Scholar
• Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, et al. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2005;433:152–159.
   Google Scholar
• Jenny JY and Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput. Aided Surg Off J Int Soc Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6(4):217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Lonner JH and Moretti VM. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ. 2016;45(4):249–254.
   Google Scholar
• Lonner JH, Smith JR, Picard F, et al. High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop. 2015;473(1):206–212.
   Google Scholar
• Lonner JH. Robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with a handheld image-free sculpting tool. Oper Tech Orthop. 2015;25(2):104–113
   Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Riches PE, Rowe PJ. Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS. 2014;10(2):162–169.
   Google Scholar
• Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty, 2007;22(8):1097–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, and Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop. 2002;404:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, and Zhang X. Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2012;20(7):1307–1322.
   Google Scholar
• Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, and Antoniou J. Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop. 2011;35(3):331–339.
   Google Scholar
• Baier C Maderbacher G, Springorum HR, et al. No difference in accuracy between pinless and conventional computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2014;22(8):1819–1826.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin KL, Barrera A, Mahoney CR, et al. Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Computer-navigated Saw: A Pilot Study. Clin Orthop. 2013;471(1):155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(3):282–288.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, et al. Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004;28(5):282–285.
   Google Scholar