Advanced search
Publication Cover
Computer Assisted Surgery Volume 24, 2019 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,279
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Three-dimensional analysis of acetabular orientation using a semi-automated algorithm

Changhwan LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea; View further author information
,
Jongseong JangCenter for Integration of Advanced Medicine Life Science Innovative Technologies (CAMIT), Department of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; View further author information
,
Hyung Wook KimInstitute of Innovative Surgical Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea; View further author information
,
Young Soo KimInstitute of Innovative Surgical Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea; View further author information
&
Yeesuk KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University, Seoul, KoreaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 18-25 | Published online: 04 Jan 2019

References

  • Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(2):228–232.
  • Pinoit Y, May O, Girard J, et al. [Low accuracy of the anterior pelvic plane to guide the position of the cup with imageless computer assistance: variation of position in 106 patients]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007;93(5):455–460.
  • Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, et al. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(4):517–523.
  • Zhang H, Wang Y, Ai S, et al. Three-dimensional acetabular orientation measurement in a reliable coordinate system among one hundred Chinese. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172297.
  • Lubovsky O, Wright D, Hardisty M, et al. Acetabular orientation: anatomical and functional measurement. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012;7(2):233–240. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0648-3.
  • Higgins SW, Spratley EM, Boe RA, et al. A novel approach for determining three-dimensional acetabular orientation: results from two hundred subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(21):1776–1784. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01141.
  • Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. An object-oriented approach to 3D graphics. Vol. 429. Upper Saddle River: Prentice hall; 1997.
  • Lee C, Kim Y, Kim HW, et al. A robust method to extract the anterior pelvic plane from CT volume independent of pelvic pose. Comput Assist Surg. 2017;22(1):20–26. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2017.1293737.
  • Abdi H. The method of least squares. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007.
  • Basu M. Gaussian-based edge-detection methods-a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C. 2002;32(3):252–260.
  • Cao M, Ye C, Doessel O, et al. Spherical parameter detection based on hierarchical Hough transform. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2006;27(9):980–986.
  • Harris C, Stephens M, editors. A combined corner and edge detector. Alvey vision conference; 1988; Citeseer.
  • Fischler MA, Bolles RC. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM. 1981;24(6):381–395.
  • Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33(3):613–619.
  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420.
  • Stem ES, O’Connor MI, Kransdorf MJ, et al. Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35(6):385–389.
  • Anda S, Svenningsen S, Grøntvedt T, et al. Pelvic inclination and spatial orientation of the acetabulum: a radiographic, computed tomographic and clinical investigation. Acta Radiol. 1990;31(4):389–394.
  • Muller O, Reize P, Trappmann D, et al. Measuring anatomical acetabular cup orientation with a new X-ray technique. Comput Aided Surg. 2006;11(2):69–75. doi: 10.3109/10929080600640618.
  • Babisch JW, Layher F, Amiot L-P. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. The J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90(2):357–365.
  • Jozwiak M, Rychlik M, Musielak B, et al. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0503-8. PubMed PMID: 25887277; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4351831.
  • Haas B, Coradi T, Scholz M, et al. Automatic segmentation of thoracic and pelvic CT images for radiotherapy planning using implicit anatomic knowledge and organ-specific segmentation strategies. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(6):1751.
  • Kobashi S, Fujimoto S, Nishiyama T, et al. Robust pelvic coordinate system determination for pose changes in multidetector-row computed tomography images. Int J Fuzzy Logic Intell Syst. 2010;10(1):65–72.
  • Lubovsky O, Peleg E, Joskowicz L, et al. Acetabular orientation variability and symmetry based on CT scans of adults. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5(5):449–454. doi: 10.1007/s11548-010-0521-9.
  • Song W, Ou Z, Zhao D, et al., editors. Computer-aided modeling and morphological analysis of hip joint. Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2007. ICBBE 2007. The 1st International Conference on; 2007: Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.