Advanced search
Publication Cover
Computer Assisted Surgery Volume 24, 2019 - Issue sup2: Advances in Computer-aided Medical Systems and Clinical Measurement. Guest Editors: Chengyu Liu & Lung-kwang Pan
Submit an article Journal homepage
4,959
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Clustering-based undersampling with random over sampling examples and support vector machine for imbalanced classification of breast cancer diagnosis

Jue ZhangSchool of Information and Technology, Northwest University, Xi’an, China; ;School of Information Engineering, Yulin University, Yulin, ChinaView further author information
&
Li ChenSchool of Information and Technology, Northwest University, Xi’an, China; Correspondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 62-72 | Published online: 12 Aug 2019

References

  • Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.
  • Paulin F, Santhakumaran A. Classification of breast cancer by comparing back propagation training algorithms. Int J Comp Sci Eng. 2011;3:S68.
  • Ahan S, Polat K, Kodaz H, et al. A new hybrid method based on fuzzy-artificial immune system and k-nn algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis. Comput Biol Med. 2007;37:415.
  • Wang S, Minku LL, Yao X. Resampling-based ensemble methods for online class imbalance learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2015;27:1356–1368.
  • Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, et al. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. JAIR. 2002;16:321–357.
  • Lunardon N, Menardi G, Torelli N. ROSE: a package for binary imbalanced learning. R J. 2014;6:79–89.
  • Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ. Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput Surv. 1999;31:264–323.
  • Ng MK. A note on constrained k-means algorithms. Pattern Recognit. 2000;33:515–519.
  • Chen J, Zhang C, Xue X, et al. Fast instance selection for speeding up support vector machines. Knowl-Based Syst. 2013;45:1–7.
  • Liu C, Wang W, Wang M, et al. An efficient instance selection algorithm to reconstruct training set for support vector machine. Knowl-Based Syst. 2017;116:58–73.
  • Li J-B, Peng Y, Liu D. Quasiconformal kernel common locality discriminant analysis with application to breast cancer diagnosis. Inf Sci. 2013;223:256–269.
  • Zheng B, Yoon SW, Lam SS. Breast cancer diagnosis based on feature extraction using a hybrid of K-means and support vector machine algorithms. Expert Syst Appl. 2014;41:1476–1482.
  • Pashaei E, Ozen M, Aydin N. Improving medical diagnosis reliability using Boosted C5.0 decision tree empowered by Particle Swarm Optimization. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference; 2015 Aug; Milan, Italy. p. 7230–7233.
  • Weng C-H, Huang T-K, Han R-P. Disease prediction with different types of neural network classifiers. Telemat Inform. 2016;33:277–292.
  • Lee W, Jun C-H, Lee J-S. Instance categorization by support vector machines to adjust weights in AdaBoost for imbalanced data classification. Inf Sci. 2017;381:92–103.
  • Nilashi M, Ibrahim O, Ahmadi H, et al. A knowledge-based system for breast cancer classification using fuzzy logic method. Telemat Inform. 2017;34:133–144.
  • Peng L, Chen W, Zhou W, et al. An immune-inspired semi-supervised algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis. Comput Meth Prog Bio. 2016;134:259–265.
  • Sheikhpour R, Sarram MA, Sheikhpour R. Particle swarm optimization for bandwidth determination and feature selection of kernel density estimation based classifiers in diagnosis of breast cancer. Appl Soft Comput. 2016;40:113–131.
  • Idicula-Thomas S, Kulkarni AJ, Kulkarni BD, et al. A support vector machine-based method for predicting the propensity of a protein to be soluble or to form inclusion body on overexpression in Escherichia coli. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:278–284.
  • Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20:273–297.
  • Han H, Wang W-Y, Mao B-H, editors. Borderline-SMOTE: a new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning. advances in intelligent computing. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005.
  • He H, Bai Y, Garcia EA, et al., editors. ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; 2008 June 1–8; Hong Kong, China: IEEE.
  • Burges CJC. Geometry and invariance in kernel based methods In: Schölkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola, AJ, et al. editors. Advances in kernel methods. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1999. p. 89–116.
  • Wang S, Yao X. Relationships between diversity of classification ensembles and single-class performance measures. IEEE T Knowl Data En. 2012;25:206–219.
  • Raeder T, Forman G, Chawla NV. Learning from imbalanced data: evaluation matters. In: Holmes DE, Jain LC, editors. Data mining: foundations and intelligent paradigms: volume 1: clustering, association and classification. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 315–331.
  • Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1937;32:675–701.
  • Pashaei E, Aydin N. Binary black hole algorithm for feature selection and classification on biological data. Appl Soft Comput. 2017;56:94–106.
  • Demšar J. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res. 2006;7:1–30.
  • Lin WC, Tsai CF, Hu YH, et al. Clustering-based undersampling in class-imbalanced data. Inf Sci. 2017;409:17–26.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.