2,391
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Quantitative assessment of three vendor’s metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging using a customized phantom

, , , &

References

  • Omar G, Abdelsalam Z, Hamed W. Quantitative analysis of metallic artifacts caused by dental metallic restorations: comparison between four CBCT scanners. Future Dent J. 2016;2:15–21.
  • Liu P, Pavlicek W, Peter M, et al. Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:797–802.
  • Paudel M, Mackenzie M, Fallone B, et al. Clinical evaluation of normalized metal artifact reduction in kVCT using MVCT prior images (MVCT-NMAR) for radiation therapy treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:682–689.
  • Zhang Y, Yan H, Jia X, et al. A hybrid metal artifact reduction algorithm for x-ray CT. Med Phys. 2013;40:041910.
  • Mehranian A, Ay M, Rahmim A, et al. 3D prior image constrained projection completion for X-ray CT metal artifact reduction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2013;60:3318–3332.
  • Nam H, Baek J. A metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT using multiple prior images by recursive active contour segmentation. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179022.
  • Peng C, Qiu B, Li M, et al. Gaussian diffusion sinograminpainting for X-ray CT metal artifact reduction. BioMed Eng OnLine. 2017;16:1.
  • Joemai R, de Bruin P, Veldkamp W, et al. Metal artifact reduction for CT: development, implementation, and clinical comparison of a generic and a scanner-specific technique. Med Phys. 2012;39:1125–1132.
  • Sofue1 K. 2018. ECR 2014/C-0674/Abdominal CT with Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction (SEMAR): Initial Experiences - EPOS™. [online] Posterng.netkey.at. Available at: http://posterng.netkey.at/esr/viewing/index.php?module=viewing_poster&pi=121748 [Accessed 5 Jun. 2018].
  • Sonoda A, Nitta N, Ushio N, et al. Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils. Jpn J Radiol. 2015;33:710–716.
  • Yasaka K, Kamiya K, Irie R, et al. Metal artefact reduction for patients with metallic dental fillings in helical neck computed tomography: comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and AIDR 3D with single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45:20160114.
  • Lee Y, Park K, Song H, et al. Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1331–1340.
  • Han S, Chung Y, Lee Y, et al. Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:788–795.
  • Dunet V, Bernasconi M, Hajdu S, et al. Impact of metal artifact reduction software on image quality of gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy cerebral CT angiography after intracranial aneurysm clipping. Neuroradiology. 2017;59:845–852.
  • Aissa J, Boos J, Schleich C, et al. Metal artifact reduction in computed tomography after deep brain stimulation electrode placement using iterative reconstructions. Invest Radiol. 2017;52:18–22.
  • Hakim A, Slotboom J, Lieger O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the iterative metal artefact reduction algorithm for post-operative CT examination after maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20160355.
  • Jani S. SU-E-I-63: quantitative evaluation of the effects of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction (OMAR) software on CT images for radiotherapy simulation. Med Phys. 2014;41:144–144.
  • Wellenberg R, Boomsma M, van Osch J, et al. Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:623–632.
  • Kidoh M, Utsunomiya D, Oda S, et al. CT venography after knee replacement surgery: comparison of dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging and single-energy metal artifact reduction techniques on a 320-row CT scanner. ActaRadiologica Open. 2017;6:205846011769346.
  • Huang J, Kerns J, Nute J, et al. An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:1047–1067.
  • Andersson K, Norrman E, Geijer H, et al. Visual grading evaluation of commercially available metal artefact reduction techniques in hip prosthesis computed tomography. BJR. 2016;89:20150993.
  • Andersson K, Nowik P, Persliden J, et al. Metal artefact reduction in CT imaging of hip prostheses—an evaluation of commercial techniques provided by four vendors. BJR. 2015;88:20140473.