1,227
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Comparison of the accuracies of computed tomography-based navigation and image-free navigation for acetabular cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position

, , , &

References

  • Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998;13(5):530–534.
  • Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–220.
  • Seagrave KG, Troelsen A, Malchau H, et al. Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(1):10–17.
  • D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315–321.
  • McCarthy TF, Alipit V, Nevelos J, et al. Acetabular cup anteversion and inclination in hip range of motion to impingement. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(9 Suppl):264–268.
  • Del Schutte H, Jr, Lipman AJ, Bannar SM, et al. Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1998;13(6):621–626.
  • Lass R, Kubista B, Olischar B, et al. Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(4):786–791.
  • Parratte S, Ollivier M, Lunebourg A, et al. No Benefit after THA performed with computer-assisted cup placement: 10-year results of a randomized controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(10):2085–2093.
  • Gandhi R, Marchie A, Farrokhyar F, et al. Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop (Sicot). 2009;33(3):593–597.
  • Beckmann J, Stengel D, Tingart M, et al. Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(5):538–544.
  • Liu Z, Gao Y, Cai L. Imageless navigation versus traditional method in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;21:122–127.
  • Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, et al. Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(11):3054–3059.
  • Iwana D, Nakamura N, Miki H, et al. Accuracy of angle and position of the cup using computed tomography-based navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2013;18(5–6):187–194.
  • Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, et al. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88-B(2):163–167.
  • Yamada K, Endo H, Tetsunaga T, et al. Accuracy of cup positioning with the computed tomography-based two-dimensional to three-dimensional matched navigation system: a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(1):136–143.
  • Tsutsui T, Goto T, Wada K, et al. Efficacy of a computed tomography-based navigation system for placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25:1–7.
  • Sendtner E, Schuster T, Wörner M, et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop (Sicot). 2011;35(6):809–815.
  • Tsukada S, Wakui M. Decreased accuracy of acetabular cup placement for imageless navigation in obese patients. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15(6):758–763.
  • Davis ET, Schubert M, Wegner M, et al. A new method of registration in navigated hip arthroplasty without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(1):55–60.
  • Barbier O, Skalli W, Mainard L, et al. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery–france (caos-france). The reliability of the anterior pelvic plane for computer navigated acetabular component placement during total hip arthroplasty: prospective study with the EOS imaging system. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(6):S287–S291.
  • Haimerl M, Schubert M, Wegner M, et al. Anatomical relationships of human pelvises and their application to registration techniques. Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(5):232–239.
  • Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(1):15–23.
  • Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(2):228–232.
  • Sugano N. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013;5(1):1–9.
  • Ybinger T, Kumpan W, Hoffart HE, et al. Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements: methods and results. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(6):812–817.
  • Wolf A, Digioia AM, III, Mor AB, et al. Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;437:132–137.
  • Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, et al. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(2):386–391.
  • Okada T, Fukunishi S, Takeda Y, et al. Total hip arthroplasty using stem-first technique with navigation: the potential of achievement of the optimal combined anteversion being a risk factor for anterior cup protrusion. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(4):807–812.
  • Tezuka T, Heckmann ND, Bodner RJ, et al. Functional safe zone is superior to the Lewinnek safe zone for total hip arthroplasty: why the Lewinnek safe zone is not always predictive of stability. J Arthroplast. 2019;34(1):3–8.