A trial to visualize perforators images from CTA with a tablet device: experience of operating on minipigs

References

• Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, et al. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(5):1517–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Grinsell D. The branching pattern of the deep inferior epigastric artery revisited in-vivo: a new classification based on CT angiography. Clin Anat. 2010;23(1):87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu P, Youssef A. Efficacy of the handheld Doppler in preoperative identification of the cutaneous perforators in the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4):928–933. discussion 934–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su W, Lu L, Lazzeri D, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with three-dimensional reconstruction in preoperative perforator flap planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):80–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen WM, Phillips TJ, Ashton MW, et al. Preoperative imaging for DIEA perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and Doppler ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(1):9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukaya E, Saloner D, Leon P, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography to evaluate septocutaneous perforators in free fibula flap transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(7):1099–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong SH, Haouchine N, Soares R, et al. Robust augmented reality registration method for localization of solid organs’ tumors using CT-derived virtual biomechanical model and fluorescent fiducials. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2863–2871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki Y, Hosaka A, Kamiuchi H, et al. New simple image overlay system using a tablet PC for pinpoint identification of the appropriate site for anastomosis in peripheral arterial reconstruction. Surg Today. 2016;46(12):1387–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiuchi H, Masamune K. Medical image overlay system with a tablet PC and three markers. IEICE Tech Rep. 2012;112(200):29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira N, Kufeke M, Parada L, et al. Augmented reality microsurgical planning with a smartphone (ARM-PS): a dissection route map in your pocket. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(5):759–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yodrabum N, Rudeejaroonrung K, Chaikangwan I, et al. Precision of low-cost augmented reality in prefabricated cutting guide for fibular free flap surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(3):916–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles AD, Thompson DG, Frantz DD. Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems. Paper presented at: Medical Imaging, 5 May, 2004; San Diego, CA; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Elfring R, de la Fuente M, Radermacher K. Assessment of optical localizer accuracy for computer aided surgery systems. Comput Aided Surg. 2010;15(1–3):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR. Jr. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(5):694–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(9):917–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stell PM. The pig as an experimental model for skin flap behaviour: a reappraisal of previous studies. Br J Plast Surg. 1977;30(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villamaria CY, Rasmussen TE, Spencer JR, et al. Microvascular porcine model for the optimization of vascularized composite tissue transplantation. J Surg Res. 2012;178(1):452–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz RD, Rosson GD, Taylor JA, et al. Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig. Microsurgery. 2005;25(7):566–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GI, Minabe T. The angiosomes of the mammals and other vertebrates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(2):181–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei J, Yin Z, Zhang J, et al. A mini pig model for visualization of perforator flap by using angiography and MIMICS. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(5):477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azuma R, Morimoto Y, Masumoto K, et al. Detection of skin perforators by indocyanine green fluorescence nearly infrared angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(4):1062–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Weerd L, Weum S, Mercer JB. The value of dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) in perforatorselection and planning of free DIEP flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(3):274–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Stella DL, et al. Stereotactic image-guided navigation in the preoperative imaging of perforators for DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2008;28(6):417–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheena Y, Jennison T, Hardwicke JT, et al. Detection of perforators using thermal imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):1603–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacifico MD, See MS, Cavale N, et al. Preoperative planning for DIEP breast reconstruction: early experience of the use of computerised tomography angiography with VoNavix 3D software for perforator navigation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(11):1464–1469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohjimi H, Era K, Fujita T, et al. Analyzing the vascular architecture of the free TRAM flap using intraoperative ex vivo angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(1):106–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steve AK, White CP, Alkhawaji A, et al. Computed tomographic angiography used for localization of the cutaneous perforators and selection of anterolateral thigh flap “Bail-Out” branches. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81(1):87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethaus B, Loberg C, Kloss-Brandstatter A, et al. Color duplex ultrasonography versus handheld Doppler to plan anterior lateral thigh flaps. Microsurgery. 2017;37(5):388–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore R, Mullner D, Nichols G, et al. Color Doppler ultrasound versus computed tomography angiography for preoperative anterolateral thigh flap perforator imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021; doi:10.1055/s-0041-1740958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JR, Liu D, Said H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography in planning abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstruction: a comparison with color duplex ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):446–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifuentes IJ, Dagnino BL, Salisbury MC, et al. Augmented reality and dynamic infrared thermography for perforator mapping in the anterolateral thigh. Arch Plast Surg. 2018;45(3):284–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitoussi A, Tacher V, Pigneur F, et al. Augmented reality-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap harvesting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(8):1931–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuri T, Mitsuno D, Iwanaga H, et al. Application of augmented reality (AR) technology to locate the cutaneous perforator of anterolateral thigh perforator flap: a case report. Microsurgery. 2022;42(1):76–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselius TS, Meulstee JW, Luijten G, et al. Holographic augmented reality for DIEP flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(1):25e–29e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt P, Ives M, Lawton G, et al. Through the HoloLens looking glass: augmented reality for extremity reconstruction surgery using 3D vascular models with perforating vessels. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2(1):2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masia J, Clavero JA, Larranaga JR, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in the planning of abdominal perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(6):594–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar