An automated optimization pipeline for clinical-grade computer-assisted planning of high tibial osteotomies under consideration of weight-bearing

References

• Paley D, Maar DC, Herzenberg JE. New concepts in high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):483–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SS, Kim JH, Kim S, et al. Avoiding overcorrection to increase patient satisfaction after open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(9):2453–2461. 20:3635465221102144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, et al. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(3):332–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nha KW, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, et al. Change in posterior tibial slope After open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):3006–3013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, et al. Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(2):376–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voos JE, Suero EM, Citak M, et al. Effect of tibial slope on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(8):1626–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi KT, Cheung EC, Markolf KL, et al. Effects of anterior closing wedge tibial osteotomy on anterior cruciate ligament force and knee kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2018; Feb46(2):370–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodel S, Zindel C, Jud L, et al. Influence of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(4):1500–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paley D. Principles of deformity correction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Jud L, Roth T, Furnstahl P, et al. The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürnstahl P, Schweizer A, Graf M, et al. Surgical treatment of long-bone deformities: 3D preoperative planning and patient-specific instrumentation. In: Zheng G, Li S, editors. Computational radiology for orthopaedic intervensions. Vol. 23. Cham: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Roth T, Rahm S, Jungwirth-Weinberger A, et al. Restoring range of motion in reduced acetabular version by increasing femoral antetorsion - What about joint load? Clin Biomech. 2021;87:105409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munier M, Donnez M, Ollivier M, et al. Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(2):245–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewurum CH, Guo Y, Pagnha S, et al. Surgical navigation in orthopedics: workflow and system review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1093:47–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AF, Kazarian GS, Jessop GW, et al. Robotic technology in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(22):1984–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joskowicz L, Hazan EJ. Computer aided orthopaedic surgery: incremental shift or paradigm change? Med Image Anal. 2016;33:84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo F, Vlachopoulos L, Schweizer A, et al. editors. A time saver: optimization approach for the fully automatic 3D planning of forearm osteotomies. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Vercauteren T, Unberath M, Padoy N, et al. CAI4CAI: the rise of contextual artificial intelligence in computer assisted interventions. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2020;108(1):198–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth T, Carrillo F, Wieczorek M, et al. Three-dimensional preoperative planning in the weight-bearing state: validation and clinical evaluation. Insights Imaging. 2021;12(1):44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck M, Hoschek J, Weber U. Three-dimensional determination of an oblique osteotomy in the hip by mathematical optimization fulfilling some anatomical demands. J Biomech. 1990;23(10):1061–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schkommodau E, Frenkel A, Belei P, et al. Computer-assisted optimization of correction osteotomies on lower extremities. Comput Aided Surg. 2005;10(5-6):345–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belei P, Schkommodau E, Frenkel A, et al. Computer-assisted single- or double-cut oblique osteotomies for the correction of lower limb deformities. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007;221(7):787–800.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spellucci P. Numerische verfahren der nichtlinearen optimierung. Basel: Birkhäuser; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo F, Roner S, von Atzigen M, et al. An automatic genetic algorithm framework for the optimization of three-dimensional surgical plans of forearm corrective osteotomies. Med Image Anal. 2020;60:101598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara S, Fasser MR, Spirig JM, et al. Bone density optimized pedicle screw instrumentation improves screw pull-out force in lumbar vertebrae. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021;9:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hill D, Williamson T, Lai CY, et al. Automated resection planning for bone tumor surgery. Comput Biol Med. 2021;137:104777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrechts A, Wirix-Speetjens R, Maes F, et al. Artificial intelligence based patient-specific preoperative planning algorithm for total knee arthroplasty. Front Robot AI. 2022;9:840282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue Y, Gao Q, Zhao M, et al. Prediction of knee prosthesis using patient gender and BMI With non-marked X-Ray by deep learning. Front Surg. 2022;9:798761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen M, Vlachopoulos L, Gerber C, et al. Regression forest-based automatic estimation of the articular margin plane for shoulder prosthesis planning. Med Image Anal. 2016;31:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulyk P, Vlachopoulos L, Fürnstahl P, et al. editors. Fully automatic planning of total shoulder arthroplasty Without segmentation: a deep learning based approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ackermann J, Wieland M, Hoch A, et al. editors. A new approach to orthopedic surgery planning using deep reinforcement learning and simulation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiari H, Anglin C, Guy P, et al. A comparative analysis of intensity-based 2D-3D registration for intraoperative use in pedicle screw insertion surgeries. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019;14(10):1725–1739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risholm P, Golby AJ, Wells W. 3rd. Multimodal image registration for preoperative planning and image-guided neurosurgical procedures. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011;22(2):197–206, viii.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postolka B, List R, Thelen B, et al. Evaluation of an intensity-based algorithm for 2D/3D registration of natural knee videofluoroscopy data. Med Eng Phys. 2020;77:107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki T, Watanabe T, Nakajima Y, et al. Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23(5):602–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsushita T, Watanabe S, Araki D, et al. Differences in preoperative planning for high-tibial osteotomy between the standing and supine positions. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021;33(1):8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoenmakers DAL, Feczko PZ, Boonen B, et al. Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(11):3569–3575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieser K, Furnstahl P, Carrillo F, et al. Assessment of the isometry of the anterolateral ligament in a 3-dimensional weight-bearing computed tomography simulation. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(5):1016–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi K, Sakamoto M, Tanabe Y, et al. Automated image registration for assessing three-dimensional alignment of entire lower extremity and implant position using bi-plane radiography. J Biomech. 2009; 42(16):2818–2822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noothout JMH, de Vos BD, Wolterink JM, et al. Deep learning-based regression and classification for automatic landmark localization in medical images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39(12):4011–4022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payer C ,Štern D, Bischof H, et al. editors. Regressing heatmaps for multiple landmark localization using CNNs. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Payer C, Stern D, Bischof H, et al. Integrating spatial configuration into heatmap regression based CNNs for landmark localization. Med Image Anal. 2019;54:207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao QJ, Zhu JH, Zhu JJ, et al. Bone anatomical landmark localization with cascaded spatial configuration network. Meas Sci Technol. 2022;33(6):065401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanmoy D. Multi-Objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lorensen WE, Cline HE, editors. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. ACM siggraph computer graphics. ACM; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe L. Stereolithography interface specification. America-3D Systems Inc.; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider P, Eberly DH. Geometric tools for computer graphics. Elsevier; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly D. Least squares fitting of data. Chapel Hill (NC): Magic Software; 2000. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T, editors. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kasten Y, Doktofsky D, Kovler I, editors. End-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D reconstruction of knee bones from bi-planar X-ray images. International Workshop on Machine Learning for Medical Image Reconstruction. Lima: Springer; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, et al. editors. {TensorFlow}: a system for {Large-Scale} machine learning. In: 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16). 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Torr PHS, Zisserman A. MLESAC: a new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry. Comput Vision Image Understanding. 2000;78(1):138–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markelj P, Tomazevic D, Likar B, et al. A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions. Med Image Anal. 2012;16(3):642–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRose D. Iterative X-Ray/CT registration using accelerated volume rendering. Pittsburgh (PA): Carnegie Mellon University; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Powell MJD. The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson SG. The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package. http://github.com/stevengj/nlopt
   Google Scholar
• Sobol IM. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathemat Mathemat Phys. 1967;7(4):86–112.
   Google Scholar
• Marzorati D, Sarti M, Mainardi L, et al. Deep 3D convolutional networks to segment bones affected by severe osteoarthritis in CT scans for PSI-based knee surgical planning. IEEE Access. 2020;8:196394–196407.
   Google Scholar
• Maintier L ,Maguet E, Clavé A, et al. editors. Tibial and femoral bones segmentation on CT-scans: a deep learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting of the interna. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz S, Morgenstern M, Imhoff AB. Development of an image-free navigation tool for high tibial osteotomy. Operat Techniq Orthopaed. 2007;17(1):58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pearle AD, Goleski P, Musahl V, et al. Reliability of image-free navigation to monitor lower-limb alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:90–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook DJ, Gladowski DA, Acuff HN, et al. Variability of manual lumbar spine segmentation. Int J Spine Surg. 2012;6:167–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zindel C, Furnstahl P, Hoch A, et al. Inter-rater variability of three-dimensional fracture reduction planning according to the educational background. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng G, Hommel H, Akcoltekin A, et al. A novel technology for 3D knee prosthesis planning and treatment evaluation using 2D X-ray radiographs: a clinical evaluation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(8):1151–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar