Virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a structured review

References

• Barr ML, Haveles CS, Rezzadeh KS, et al. Virtual surgical planning for mandibular reconstruction with the fibula free flap: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(1):117–122. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon T-G, Lee S-T, Choi S-Y, et al. Considerations for virtual surgical planning and simulation in orthognathic surgery—a narrative review. Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2020;2:27–27. doi: 10.21037/fomm-20-54.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandari K, Lin C-H, Liao H-T. Secondary mandible reconstruction with computer-assisted-surgical simulation and patient-specific pre-bent plates: the algorithm of virtual planning and limitations revisited. Appl. Sci. 2022;12(9):4672. doi: 10.3390/app12094672.
   Google Scholar
• Efanov JI, Roy A-A, Huang KN, et al. Virtual surgical planning: the pearls and pitfalls. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(1):e1443. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung RD, Hunter-Smith DJ, Spychal RT, et al. A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery. Gland Surg. 2017;6(6):715–725. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.11.02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolphs N, Haberl E-J, Liu W, et al. Virtual planning for craniomaxillofacial surgery – 7 years of experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(5):e289–e295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghai S, Sharma Y, Jain N, et al. Use of 3-D printing technologies in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;22(3):249–259. doi: 10.1007/s10006-018-0704-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalmar CL, Xu W, Zimmerman CE, et al. Trends in utilization of virtual surgical planning in pediatric craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(7):1900–1905. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider D, Kämmerer PW, Hennig M, et al. Customized virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(7):3115–3122. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2732-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglitto F, Dell’Aversana Orabona G, Committeri U, et al. Virtual surgical planning and the ‘in-house’ rapid prototyping technique in maxillofacial surgery: the current situation and future perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2021;11(3):1009. doi: 10.3390/app11031009.
   Google Scholar
• Smithers FAE, Cheng K, Jayaram R, et al. Maxillofacial reconstruction using in-house virtual surgical planning: centre-specific virtual surgical planning. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(9):907–912. doi: 10.1111/ans.14353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukegawa S, Kanno T. Computer-assisted navigation surgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery. In: K. Bonanthaya, E. Panneerselvam, S. Manuel, V. V. Kumar, and A. Rai, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery for the clinician. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2021, pp. 841–862. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_41.
   Google Scholar
• Hua J, Aziz S, Shum JW. Virtual surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019;31(4):519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleman J, Thieringer F, Beinemann J, et al. Computer-assisted virtual planning and surgical template fabrication for frontoorbital advancement. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(5):E5. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.FOCUS14852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkaabi S, Maningky M, Helder MN, et al. Virtual and traditional surgical planning in orthognathic surgery – systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022;60(9):1184–1191. p. S026643562200225X, doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera JE. Virtual surgical planning improves surgical outcome measures in obstructive sleep apnea surgery: VSP improves surgical outcomes in OSA surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(5):1259–1266. doi: 10.1002/lary.24501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine JP, Patel A, Saadeh PB, et al. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: the new state of the art. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):288–293. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241ba92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs CA, Lin AY. A new classification of three-dimensional printing technologies: systematic review of three-dimensional printing for patient-specific craniomaxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1211–1220. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herford AS, Miller M, Lauritano F, et al. The use of virtual surgical planning and navigation in the treatment of orbital trauma. Chin J Traumatol. 2017;20(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.11.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrew TW, Baylan J, Mittermiller PA, et al. Virtual surgical planning decreases operative time for isolated single suture and multi-suture craniosynostosis repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(12):e2038. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang Y-H, Seelaus R, Zhao L, et al. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report. Int Med Case Rep J. 2016;9:341–345. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S118139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pijpker PAJ, Wagemakers M, Kraeima J, et al. Three-dimensional printed polymethylmethacrylate casting molds for posterior fossa reconstruction in the surgical treatment of Chiari I malformation: technical note and illustrative cases. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios O, Lerhe B, Chamorey E, et al. Accuracy of segmented Le fort I osteotomy with virtual planning in orthognathic surgery using patient-specific implants: a case series. J Clin Med. 2022;11(19):5495. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Ma L, Wang Z, et al. The use of 3D-printed titanium mesh tray in treating complex comminuted mandibular fractures: a case report. Medicine . 2017;96(27):e7250. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, et al. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willinger K, Guevara-Rojas G, Cede J, et al. Comparison of feasibility, time consumption and costs of three virtual planning systems for surgical correction of midfacial deficiency. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;43(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00284-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May MM, Howe BM, O'Byrne TJ, et al. Short and long‐term outcomes of three‐dimensional printed surgical guides and virtual surgical planning versus conventional methods for fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible: decreased nonunion and complication rates. Head Neck. 2021;43(8):2342–2352. doi: 10.1002/hed.26688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019;104:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:178–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhayer A, Piffkó J, Lippold C, et al. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head Face Med. 2020;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu S, Chen D, He H, et al. Clinical concept extraction: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform. 2020;109:103526. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisiak-Myszke M, Marciniak D, Bieliński M, et al. Application of finite element analysis in oral and maxillofacial surgery—a literature review. Materials. 2020;13(14):3063. doi: 10.3390/ma13143063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swennen GRJ, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(10):2080–2092. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolozzi P. Computer-aided design and computer-aided modeling (CAD/CAM) generated surgical splints, cutting guides and custom-made implants: which indications in orthognathic surgery? Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2015;116(6):343–349. doi: 10.1016/j.revsto.2015.09.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun Y, Luebbers H-T, Agbaje JO, et al. Accuracy of upper jaw positioning with intermediate splint fabrication after virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(6):1871–1876. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31829a80d9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousley RR, Turner MJ. Digital model planning and computerized fabrication of orthognathic surgery wafers. J Orthod. 2014;41(1):38–45. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000075.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sozzi D, Filippi A, Canzi G, et al. Surgical navigation in mandibular reconstruction: accuracy evaluation of an innovative protocol. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):2060. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swendseid BP, Roden DF, Vimawala S, et al. Virtual surgical planning in subscapular system free flap reconstruction of midface defects. Oral Oncol. 2020;101:104508. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matias M, Zenha H, Costa H. Three-dimensional printing: custom-made implants for craniomaxillofacial reconstructive surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2017;10(2):89–98. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1594277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazzola F, Smithers F, Cheng K, et al. Time and cost-analysis of virtual surgical planning for head and neck reconstruction: a matched pair analysis. Oral Oncol. 2020;100:104491. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W-F, Choi WS, Leung YY, et al. Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific surgical plates in head and neck reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Oral Oncol. 2018;78:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flügge T, Kramer J, Nelson K, et al. Digital implantology—a review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery. Part II: prosthetic set-up and virtual implant planning. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02057-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardini AL, Larosa MA, de Carvalho Zavaglia CA, et al. Customised titanium implant fabricated in additive manufacturing for craniomaxillofacial surgery: this paper discusses the design and fabrication of a metallic implant for the reconstruction of a large cranial defect. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2014;9(2):115–125. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2014.900857.
   Google Scholar
• Kongsong W, Sittitavornwong S. Utilization of virtual surgical planning for surgical splint-assisted comminuted maxillomandibular fracture reduction and/or fixation. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2020;13(4):334–341. doi: 10.1177/1943387520948677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li J, Xu Y, et al. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning-assisted management for maxillary hypoplasia in adult patients with cleft lip and palate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(1):134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Fang B, Zhang S, et al. Oral and maxillofacial surgery in China: past, present and future. OJST. 2013;03(07):354–358. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2013.37060.
   Google Scholar
• Quereshy FA, Levintov N, Nguyen JL, et al. The role of virtual surgical planning in increasing the predictability in orthognathic surgery. JDMS. 2019;2(1):136–141. doi: 10.18314/jdms.v2i1.1633.
   Google Scholar
• Antonini F, Borba AM, Pagnoncelli RM, et al. Does a learning curve exist for accuracy in three-dimensional planning for maxillary positioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(6):787–793. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Y-F, Chen Y-A, Chen Y-C, et al. Outcomes of conventional versus virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery using surgery-first approach for class III asymmetry. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(4):1509–1516. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03241-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritto FG, Schmitt ARM, Pimentel T, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary position between conventional model surgery and virtual surgical planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(2):160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Riu G, Virdis PI, Meloni SM, et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(2):293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Jiang Y, Zhang N, et al. Clinical feasibility and efficacy of using virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery without intermediate splint. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(2):501–505. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying X, Tian K, Zhang K, et al. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01892-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye N, Long H, Zhu S, et al. The accuracy of computer image-guided template for mandibular angle ostectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(1):117–123. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0424-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Xu L, Zhu H, et al. Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13(1):63. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qu X, Wang M, Xu L, et al. Occlusion guided double-barreled fibular osteoseptocutaneous free flap for refined mandibular reconstruction aided by virtual surgical planning. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(6):1472–1476. Sep doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez BM, Chiodo MV, Patel PA. Customized ‘in-Office’ three-dimensional printing for virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(5):1584–1586. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knitschke M, Bäcker C, Schmermund D, et al. “Impact of planning method (conventional versus virtual) on time to therapy initiation and resection margins: a retrospective analysis of 104 immediate jaw reconstructions. Cancers. 2021;13(12):3013. doi: 10.3390/cancers13123013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sembronio S, Tel A, Costa F, et al. Accuracy of custom-fitted temporomandibular joint alloplastic reconstruction and virtual surgical planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48(8):1077–1083. Aug doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gh. Moghaddam M, Garcia GJM, Frank-Ito DO, et al. Virtual septoplasty: a method to predict surgical outcomes for patients with nasal airway obstruction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15(4):725–735. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02124-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq J, Patel N, Weimer K, et al. Single stage treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint using patient-specific total joint replacement and virtual surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52(4):350–355. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar