Performance assessment of surgical tracking systems based on statistical process control and longitudinal QA

References

• Germano IM, Queenan JV. Clinical experience with intracranial brain needle biopsy using frameless surgical navigation. Comput Aid Surg. 1998;3(1):33–39. doi: 10.3109/10929089809148126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omay SB, Barnett GH. Surgical navigation for meningioma surgery. J Neurooncol. 2010;99(3):357–364. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0359-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sembrano JN, Yson SC, Theismann JJ. Computer navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(4):415–424. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09577-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virk S, Qureshi S. Navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(Suppl 1):S25–S30. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broers H, Jansing N. How precise is navigation for minimally invasive surgery? Int Orthop. 2007;31(Suppl 1):S39–S42. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0431-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siessegger M, Mischkowski RA, Schneider BT, et al. Image guided surgical navigation for removal of foreign bodies in the head and neck. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001;29(6):321–325. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard ASTM. F2554-10 standard practice for measurement of positional accuracy of computer assisted surgical systems. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM Int; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles AD, Thompson DG, Frantz DD. Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems. Medical Imaging 2004: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display vol. 5367; 2004. p. 421. doi: 10.1117/12.536128.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz DD, Wiles AD, Leis SE, et al. Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48(14):2241–2251. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/14/314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banivaheb N. Comparing measured and theoretical target registration: error of an optical tracking system. Master's Thesis, York University; 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10315/30053
   Google Scholar
• Frantz DD, Kirsch SR, Wiles AD. Specifying 3D tracking system accuracy one manufacturer’s views. In: Proceedings of Bildverarbeitung für die medizin 2004. Berlin: Springer; 2004. p. 234–238.
   Google Scholar
• Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W, et al. Electromagnetic tracking in medicine -A review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33(8):1702–1725. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teatini A, Perez de Frutos J, Lango T, et al. Assessment and comparison of target registration accuracy in surgical instrument tracking technologies. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018;2018:1845–1848. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512671.
   Google Scholar
• Koivukangas T, Katisko JPA, Koivukangas JP. Technical accuracy of optical and the electromagnetic tracking systems. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):90. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson E, Yaniv Z, Zhang H, et al. A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study. Medical Imaging 2007: Visualization and Image-Guided Procedures, vol. 6509, 2007. p. 65092T. doi: 10.1117/12.712701.
   Google Scholar
• Seeberger R, Kane G, Hoffmann J, et al. Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(2):156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby T, Lehmann J, Bencomo JA, et al. Quality assurance for nonradiographic radiotherapy localization and positioning systems: report of task group 147. Med Phys. 2012;39(4):1728–1747. doi: 10.1118/1.3681967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattori G, Hrbacek J, Regele H, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of a novel solution for respiratory-gated PBS proton therapy based on optical tracking of surface markers. Z Med Phys. 2022;32(1):52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santanam L, Noel C, Willoughby TR, et al. Quality assurance for clinical implementation of an electromagnetic tracking system. Med Phys. 2009;36(8):3477–3486. doi: 10.1118/1.3158812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppenga R, Kuhlmann K, Ruers T, et al. Accuracy assessment of wireless transponder tracking in the operating room environment. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(12):1937–1948. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1838-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewhart WA. Economic quality control of manufactured product. Bell Syst Tech J. 1930;9(2):364–389. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1930.tb00373.x.
   Google Scholar
• Benneyan JC, Lloyd RC, Plsek PE. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(6):458–464. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed MA, Cheng KK, Rouse A, et al. Bristol, shipman, and clinical governance: Shewhart’s forgotten lessons. Lancet. 2001;357(9254):463–467. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04019-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiehl JB, Bach J, Heck DA. Validation and metrology in CAOS. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, DiGioia AM, editors. Navigation and MIS in orthopedic surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. p. 68–78. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-36691-1_9.
   Google Scholar
• Noyez L. Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(3):494–499. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.204768.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahian DM, Williamson WA, Svensson LG, et al. Applications of statistical quality control to cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(5):1351–1359. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00796-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(9):917–927. doi: 10.1109/42.952729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JM. Fiducial registration error and target registration error are uncorrelated. Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 7261; 2009. p. 726102. doi: 10.1117/12.813601.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CRJ. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(5):694–702. doi: 10.1109/42.736021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiselman JS, Miga MI. Strain energy decay predicts elastic registration accuracy from intraoperative data constraints. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021;40(4):1290–1302. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3052523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamming NM, Daly MJ, Irish JC, et al. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in intraoperative cone-beam CT guidance of head and neck surgery. in 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2008. p. 3643–3648. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649997.
   Google Scholar
• Danilchenko A, Fitzpatrick JM. General approach to first-order error prediction in rigid point registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011;30(3):679–693. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2091513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Ellis RE. Analytic expressions for fiducial and surface target registration error. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):637–644. doi: 10.1007/11866763_78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiles AD, Likholyot A, Frantz DD, et al. A statistical model for Point-Based target registration error with anisotropic fiducial localizer error. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27(3):378–390. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.908124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasso A, Heffter T, Rankin A, et al. Plus: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(10):2527–2537. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2322864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokuda J, Fischer GS, Papademetris X, et al. OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int J Med Robot. 2009;5(4):423–434. doi: 10.1002/rcs.274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn BKP. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987;4(4):629. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.4.000629.
   Google Scholar
• Matei B, Meer P. Optimal rigid motion estimation and performance evaluation with bootstrap. Proceedings 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149), vol. 1, IEEE; 1999. p. 339–345. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.1999.786961.
   Google Scholar
• Heckert N, Filliben J, Croarkin C, et al. Handbook 151: NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of statistical methods. Gaithersburg (MD): National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2002. (NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR)).
   Google Scholar
• Shewhart WA. Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. New York (NY): Dover Publications Inc.; 1937.
   Google Scholar
• Fattori G, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, et al. Technical assessment of the NDI polaris vega optical tracking system. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01804-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar