Biomechanical behavior of the three-dimensionally printed surgical plates for mandibular defect reconstruction: a finite element analysis

References

• Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Ishibashi-Kanno N, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity. Head Face Med. 2014;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-10-45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang WB, Yu Y, Wang Y, et al. Improving the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest flap: role of computer-assisted techniques. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(11):1819–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katakura A, Shibahara T, Noma H, et al. Material analysis of AO plate fracture cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(3):348–352. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martola M, Lindqvist C, Hänninen H, et al. Fracture of titanium plates used for mandibular reconstruction following ablative tumor surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;80(2):345–352. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30603.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rana M, Chin SJ, Muecke T, et al. Increasing the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps using functionalized selective laser-melted patient-specific implants: a retrospective multicenter analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(8):1212–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W F, Choi WS, Leung YY, et al. Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific surgical plates in head and neck reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Oral Oncol. 2018;78(12):31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang WF, Zhang CY, Choi WS, et al. A novel ‘surgeon-dominated’ approach to the design of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates in mandibular reconstruction: a proof-of-concept study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du R, Su YX, Yan Y, et al. A systematic approach for making 3D-printed patient-specific implants for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Engineering. 2020;6(11):1291–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CF, Yu Y, Bai W, et al. Mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed titanium plates used in jaw reconstruction: preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51(6):754–761. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd JB, Gullane PJ, Rotstein LE, et al. Classification of mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(7):1266–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony AK, Chen WF, Kolokythas A, et al. Use of virtual surgery and stereolithography-guided osteotomy for mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1080–1084. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong S, Shi Q, Sun Y, et al. Biomechanical comparison of locking and non-locking patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate using finite element analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;124(9):104849. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104849.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SM, Lee JW, Noh G. Which plate results in better stability after segmental mandibular resection and fibula free flap reconstruction? Biomechanical analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;126(5):380–389. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.05.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoldelli C, Bouchard PO, Loudad R, et al. Stress distribution in the temporo-mandibular joint discs during jaw closing: a high-resolution three-dimensional finite-element model analysis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(5):405–413. doi: 10.1007/s00276-011-0917-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tie Y, Wang DM, Ji T, et al. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical effects of human mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34(5):290–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y, et al. Finite element analysis of the stresses around fixtures in various reconstructed mandibular models – Part II (effect of horizontal load). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31(3):168–175. doi: 10.1016/S1010-5182(03)00029-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijden TMGJ. Biomechanics of the mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;11(1):123–136. doi: 10.1177/10454411000110010101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bujtár P, Simonovics J, Váradi K, et al. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(6):855–862. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P. Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34(4):201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong S, Shi Q, Van Dessel J, et al. Biomechanical validation of structural optimized patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate orienting additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;224:107023. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng K J, Liu Y F, Wang JH, et al. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(2):281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Sun Y, Yang S, et al. Preclinical study of additive manufactured plates with shortened lengths for complete mandible reconstruction: design, biomechanics simulation, and fixation stability assessment. Comput Biol Med. 2021;139:105008. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, et al. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54(3):397–425. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuo N. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;243(1–2):231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Sun Y, Yang S, et al. Failure analysis of an in-vivo fractured patient-specific Ti6Al4V mandible reconstruction plate fabricated by selective laser melting. Eng Fail Anal. 2021;124(3):105353. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105353.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SP, Cai ZG, Zhang J, et al. Plate related complication after mandibular reconstruction. Chin J Stomatol. 2013;48(10):586–590.
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Shen L, Li J, et al. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(1):73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutwald R, Jaeger R, Lambers FM. Customized mandibular reconstruction plates improve mechanical performance in a mandibular reconstruction model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017;20(4):426–435. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1240788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefert S, Taier R. Mechanical stress in plates for bridging reconstruction mandibular defects and purposes of double plate reinforcement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(5):785–794. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.01.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar