Phylogenetic relationships of D. rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) and D. bithynica(Mehely, 1909) based on microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA in Turkey

References

• Akın C, Bilgin CC, Beerli P, Westaway R, Ohst T, Litvinchuk SN, Uzzell T, Bilgin M, Hotz H, Guex GD, et al. 2010. Phylogeographic patterns ofgenetic diversity in eastern Mediterranean water frogs were determined by geological processes and climate change in the Late Cenozoic. J Biogeogr. 37:2111–2124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arribas O, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, Durmuş SH, Avcı A, Üzüm N. 2013. External morphology and osteology of Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886), with a taxonomic revision of the Pontic and Small-Caucasus populations (Squamata: Lacertidae). Zootaxa. 3626:401–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avise JC. 2000. Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, p. 447.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard JW, Whitlock MC. 2004. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol Ecol. 13:729–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başoğlu M, Baran İ. 1977. Türkiye Sürüngenleri: Kaplumbağa ve Kertenkeleler. İzmir, Turkey: İlker Press, p 272.
   Google Scholar
• Bedriaga JV. 1886. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Lacertiden-Familie. (Lacerta, Algiroides, Tropidosaura, Zerzumia und Bettaia), Abhandlungen der senckenbergischen naturforschenden. Ges Nat. 14:17–443.
   Google Scholar
• Bellati A, Carranza S, Garcia-Porta J, Fasola M, Sindaco R. 2015. Cryptic diversity within the Anatololacerta species complex (Squamata: Lacertidae) in the Anatolian Peninsula: evidence from a multi-locus approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 82:219–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukema W, De Pous P, Donaire D, Escoriza D, Bogaerts S, Toxopeus AG, De Bie CAJM, Roca J, Carranza S. 2010. Biogeography and contemporary climatic differentiation among Moroccan Salamandra algira. Biol J Linn Soc. 101:626–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer FS. 1944. Introduction into the knowledge of the amphibia and reptilia of Turkey. Istanbul Univ Fen Fak Mecm Ser B. 9:1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Boulenger GA. 1904. On the Lacerta depressa of Camerano. Proc Zool Soc. 2:332–339.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme W, Budak A. 1977. Über die rudis-Gruppe des Lacerta saxicola Komplexes in der Türkei, I (Reptilia: Sauria: Lacertidae). Salamandra. 13:141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme W, Bischoff W. 1984. Lacerta rudis Bedriaga 1886 – Kielschwanz-Felseidechse. In: Böhme W, editor. Handbuch der reptilien und amphibien Europas. Lacerta: Band 2/I Echsen II. p. 332–344.
   Google Scholar
• Budak A, Böhme W. 1978. Über die rudis-Gruppe des Lacerta saaeicola komplexes in der Türkei, I (Reptilia: Sauria: Lacertidae). Ann Naturhistor Mus Wien. 81:273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Carranza S, Harris DJ, Arnold EN, Batista V, Gonzalez de la Vega JP. 2006. Phylogeography of the lacertid lizard, Psammodromus algirus, in Iberia andacross the Strait of Gibraltar. J Biogeogr. 33:1279–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 9:1657–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darevsky IS. 1967. Rock lizards of the Caucasus. (Systematic, ecology and phylogeneis of the polymorphic groups of rock lizards of the subgenus Archaeolacerta). Leningrad: Nauka Press, p. 276.
   Google Scholar
• Davis PH. 1971. Distribution patterns in Anatolia with particular reference to endemism. In: Davis PH, Harper PC, Hedge IC, editors. Plant life of South-West Asia. Edinburgh: The Botanical Society of Edinburgh. p. 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Farris FS, Kallersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst Biol. 44:570–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J. 1999. Direct submission.
   Google Scholar
• Fu J, Murphy RV, Darevsky IS. 2000. Divergence of the cytochrome b gene in the Lacerta raddei complex and its parthenogenetic daughter species: evidence for recent multiple origins. Copeia. 2:432–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover CP, Robertson AH. 1998. Role of regional extension and uplift in the Plio-Pleistocene evolution of the Aksu Basin, SW Turkey. J Geol Soc. 155:365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grechko VV, Bannikova AA, Kosushkin SA, Ryabinina NL, Milto KD, Darevsky IS, Kramerov DA. 2007. Molecular genetic diversification of the lizard complex Darevskia raddei (Sauria: Lacertidae): early stages of speciation. Mol Biol. 41:764–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman GC, Soule M, Yang SY, Nevo E. 1975. Evolutionary genetics of insular Adriatic lizards. Evolution. 29:52–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Dai X, Chen D, Papenfuss TJ, Ananjeva NJ, Melnikov DA, Wang Y. 2011. Phylogeny and divergence times of some racerunner lizards (Lacertidae: Eremias) inferred from mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene segments. Mol Phylogenet Evol.61:400–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of population genetics 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick PW. 2000. Genetics of populations. 2nd ed. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt GM. 2001. Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography - or seeing genes in space and time. Mol Ecol. 10:537–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt GM. 2004. The structure of biodiversity - insights from molecular phylogeography. Front Zool. 1:4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Hillis DM. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four- taxon case. Syst Biol. 42:247–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis DM. 1987. Molecular vs. morphological approach to systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18:23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jobb G. 2011. TREEFINDER Manual Version of March 2011. distributed by the author, Munich, Germany. Available from: http://www.treefinder.de/(www.treefinder.de).
   Google Scholar
• Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 8:275–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press, p. 21–132.
   Google Scholar
• Korchagin VI, Badaeva TN, Tokarskaya ON, Martirosyan IA, Darevsky IS, Ryskov AP. 2007. Molecular characterization of allelic variants of (GATA)n microsatellite loci in parthenogenetic lizards Darevskia unisexualis (Lacertidae). Gene. 392:126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornilios P, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, Giokas S, Fraguedakis-Tsolis S, Chondropoulos B. 2011. The role of Anatolian refugia in herpetofaunal diversity: an mtDNA analysis of Typhlops vermicularis Merrem, 1820 (Squamata, Typhlopidae). Amphibia-Reptilia. 32:351–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosswig C. 1955. Zoogeography of the Near East. Syst Zool. 4:49–73.
   Google Scholar
• Lantz LA, Cyrén O. 1936. Contribution à la connaissance de Lacerta saxicola Eversmann. B Soc Zool Fr. 61:159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Leaché AD, Reeder TW. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst Biol. 51:44–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lymberakis P, Poulakakis N, Manthalou G, Tsigenopoulos CS, Magoulas A, Mylonas M. 2007. Mitochondrial phylogeography of Rana (Pelophylax) populations in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 44:115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCulloch RD, Fu J, Darevsky IS, Danielyan FD, Murphy RW. 1995. Allozyme variation in three closely related species of Caucasian rock lizards (Lacerta). Amphibia-Reptilia. 16:1–340.
   Google Scholar
• Méhely LV. 1909. Materialien zu einer Systematik und Phylogenie der muralis-ähnlichen Lacerten. Ann Hist Nat Mus Nat Hun.g 3:409–621.
   Google Scholar
• Milto KD. 2010. Status of the rare rock lizard, Darevskia tristis from pontic mountains. 7th Symposium on the lacertids of the Mediterranean Basin Mallorca, Spain, p 52.
   Google Scholar
• Nei M, Kumar S. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G. 1991.The simple fool’s guide to PCR version 2.0, privately published document compiled by S. Palumbi. Honululu, Hawaii, HI: University of Hawaii, Deparement of Zoology.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR. 1996. Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, editors. Molecular systematics. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA. p. 205–248.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlicev M, Mayer W. 2006. Multiple copies of coding as well as pseudogene c-mos sequence exist in three lacertid species. J Exp Zool B. 306:539–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlicev M, Pinsker W, Mayer W. 2011. Phylogenetic relationships among four lizards species of the genus Phoenicolacerta (Squamata: Lacertidae) from the Middle East. Molecular Systematics, Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 28:2537–2539.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulakakis N, Lymberakis P, Antoniou A, Chalkia D, Zouros E, Mylonas M, Valakos E. 2003. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the wall-lizard Podarcis erhardii (Squamata: Lacertidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 28:38–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulakakis N, Lymberakis P, Valakos E, Pafilis P, Zouros E, Mylonas M. 2005. Phylogeography of Balkan wall lizard (Podarcis taurica) and its relatives inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Ecol. 14:2433–2443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rato C, Carranza S, Perera A, Carretero MA, Harris DJ. 2010. Conflicting patterns of nucleotide diversity between mtDNA and nDNA in the Moorish gecko, Tarentola mauritanica. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 56:962–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez F. 2010. Integrating phylogeographic patterns of microsatellite and mtDNA divergence to infer the evolutionary history of chamois (genus Rupicapra). BMC Evol Biol. 10:222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist A, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19:1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryabinina NL, Bannikova AA, Kosushkin SA, Ciobanu DG, Milto KD, Tuniyev BS, Orlova VF, Grechko VV, Darevsky IS. 2003. Estimation of the subspecific level of differentiation in Caucasian Lizards of the Genus Darevskia (SYN. “Lacerta saxicola complex,” Lacertidae, Sauria) Using Genome DNA Markers. Russ J Herpetol. 9:185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sindaco R, Kornilios P, Sacchi R, Lymberakis P. 2014. Taxonomic reassessment of Blanus strauchi (Bedriaga, 1884) (Squamata: Amphisbaenia: Blanidae), with the description of a new species from south-east Anatolia (Turkey). Zootaxa. 3795:311–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slatkin M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 139:457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidtler JF. 1998. Verbreitungsstrukturen der Herpetofauna im Taurus-Gebirge, Türkei (Amphibia; Reptilia). Faunistische Abhandlungen. Staatliches Museum Für Tierkunde in Dresden. 21:133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2000. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinaeur Associates,.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkhnishvili DN, Murtskhvaladze M, Gavashelishvili A. 2013. Speciation in Caucasian lizards: climatic dissimilarity of the habitats is more important than isolation time. Biol J Linnean Soc. 109:876–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavaré S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lec Math Life Sci. 17:57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Terent'ev PV, Chernov SA. 1965. Key to the amphibians and reptiles, Isreal Programme of Translations. 3th Edition, Jerusalem, p. 1–315.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:4876–4882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos R, Carranza S, Harris DJ. 2010. Insight into an island radiation: the Tarentola geckos of the Cape Verde archipelago. J Biogeogr. 37:1047–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veith M, Steinfartz S. 2004. When non-monophyly results in taxonomic consequences – the case of Mertensiella within the Salamandridae (Amphibia: Urodela). Salamandra. 40:67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Werner F. 1902. Die Reptilien und Amphibienfauna von Kleinasien, SB. Akad. Wiss Wien Math Nat KL. 111:1057–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang DX, Hewitt GM. 2003. Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of populations: practice, problems and prospects. Mol Ecol. 12:563–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar