Characterization of threatened endemic fish Osteobrama belangeri (Valenciennes, 1844) and related species from North-East India based on morphological and molecular analysis

References

• Akyol O, Kinacigil T. 2002. Comparative body and otolith morphometrics of Mugilidae in Homa Lagoon (Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea). Acta Adriat. 42:3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ambili TR, Manimekalan A, Verma MS. 2014. Genetic diversity of genus Tor in river Chaliyar, Southern Western Ghats, Kerala: through DNA Barcoding. J Sci. 4:206–214.
   Google Scholar
• Bakawale S, Kanhere RR. 2013. Study on the fish species diversity of the river Narmada in Western Zone. Res J Anim Vet Fish Sci. 1:18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Behera BK, Das P, Ngachan SV. 2009. Strategies for improving fish production in Loktak Lake. In: Kosygin L, editor. Ecology, aquatic bio-resources and conservation of wetlands of North East India. New Delhi: Akansha Publishing House; p. 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Behera BK, Das P, Singh NS, Sahu AK. 2010. Captive Breeding of an endemic medium carp Pengba, Osteobrama belangeri (Val.) with Wova-FH in Manipur. J Aquac. 18:23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bronte CR, Fleischer GW, Maistrenko SG, Pronin NM. 1999. Stock structure of Lake Baikal omul as determine by whole body morphology. J Fish Biol. 54:787–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadrin SX, Friedland KD. 1999. The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fish Res. 43:129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAMP. 1998. Conservation assessment and management plan for freshwater fishes of India. Workshop report. Zoo Outreach Organization, Coimbatore/CBSG and NBFGR, Lucknow, India. 22–26 September 1997. p. 1–158.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors, multivariate. Behav Res. 1:245–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Junior HLB, Teng F. 2005. A content-based image retrieval system for fish taxonomy. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGMM international workshop on Multimedia information retrieval. p. 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Day F. 1888. Fishes of India. Supplement, October 1888. London: William Dawson; p. 779–816.
   Google Scholar
• Day F. 1889. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Fishes Volume I. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dean MN, Huber DR, Nance HA. 2006. Functional morphology of jaw trabeculation in the lesser electric ray Narcine brasiliensis, with comments on the evolution of structural support in the Batoidea. J Morphol 267:1137–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott NG, Haskard K, Koslow JA. 1995. Morphometric analysis of orange roughly (Hoplostethus atianticus) off the continental slope of Southern Australia. J Fish Biol 46:202–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.50 Distributed by the author. Seattle: Department of Genetics, University of Wasington.
   Google Scholar
• Gilles A, Lecointre G, Faure E, Chappaz R, Brun G. 1998. Mitochondrial phylogeny of the European cyprinids: implications for their systematics, reticulate evolution, and colonization time. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 10:132–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 2003. Multivariate data analysis. Delhi: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 4:9.
   Google Scholar
• Hard JJ, Winans GA, Richardson JC. 1999. Phenotypic and genetic architecture of juvenile morphometry in chinook salmon. J Hered. 90:597–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270:313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora SL. 1921. Fish and Fisheries of Manipur with some observation on those of the Naga Hills. Rec Indian Mus. 22:165–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hora SL, Misra KS. 1940. On the fishes of the genus Rohtee Sykes. Rec Indian Mus. 42:155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Iliadou K, Sourdis J, Economidis PS, Wheeler A. 1996. Morphological differentiation among species of the genus Scardinius (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Greece. J Nat Hist. 30:459–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram KC. 1999. The freshwater fishes of the Indian region. Delhi: Narendra Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyankar VB, Nalage DN, Dhondage TB, Akhade SS, Jamdar SV. 2012. Study of fish biodiversity from lower Dudhana Project at Parbhani District, India. J Zool. 7:320–322.
   Google Scholar
• Karakousis Y, Peios C, Economidis PS, Triantaphyllidis C. 1993. Multivariate analyses of the morphological variability among Barbus peloponnesius (Cyprinidae) populations from Greece and two populations of B. meridionalis meridionalis and B. meridionalis petenyi. Cybium. 17:229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Karaoglu H, Belduz AO. 2011. Multivariate discrimination among three Trachurus species from Turkey. J Anim Vet Adv. 10:121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Ko H, Wang Y, Chiu T, Lee M, Leu M, Chang K, Chen W, Shao K. 2013. Evaluating the accuracy of morphological identification of larval fishes by applying DNA barcoding. PLoS One. 8:e53451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottelat M. 2013. The fishes of inland waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raff Bull Zool. (Suppl 27):1–663.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar KS, Goswami UC. 2012. Morphometric analysis and identification on specific metric characters pertaining growth of the Osteobrama cotio of the Brahmaputra, Barak and Teesta river of North Eastern Himalayan river systems. Proc Zool Soc. 66:51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Kushwaha B, Nagpure NS, Behera BK, Srivastava SK, Lakra WS. 2009. Physical mapping of rRNA gene in endangered fish Osteobrama belangeri (Valenciennes, 1844) (Family: Cyprinidae). Indian J Exp Biol. 47:597–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakra WS, Sarkar UK, Kumar RS, Pandey A, Dubey VK, Gusain OP. 2010. Fish diversity, habitat ecology and their conservation and management issues of a tropical River in Ganga basin, India. Environmentalist. 30:306–319.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang X, He S. 2005. Phylogenetic studies of Chinese labeonine fishes (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) based on the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene. Prog Nat Sci. 3:213–219.
   Google Scholar
• Malakar AK, Lakra WS, Goswami M, Singh M, Mishra RM. 2012. Molecular identification of three Ompok species using mitochondrial COI gene. Mitochondrial DNA. 23:20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz C, Dowling TE, Brown WM. 1987. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Rev Ecol Syst. 18:269–292.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura M. 1969. Cyprinid fishes of Japan. Tokyo: Research Institute for Natural Resources. (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Nei ZL, Wei J, Ma ZH, Zhang L, Song W, Wang WM, Zhang J. 2014. Morphological variations of Schizothoracinae species in the Muzhati river. J Appl Ichthyol. 30:359–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbi S, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stica L, Grabowski G. 1991. The simple fools guide to PCR, Version II. Honolulu: University of Hawii.
   Google Scholar
• Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. 2012. ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Mol Ecol 21:1864–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman AK. 1989. Freshwater fishes of Bangladesh. The Zoological Society of Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 1990. Numerical taxonomy: a multivariate analysis system. New York: Exeter Software.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 2006. tpsDig2, Version 2. 1. State University of New York, Stony Brook. Available from: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph
   Google Scholar
• Ruzzante DE, Taggart CT, Cook D. 1996. Spatial and temporal variation in the genetic composition of a larval cod (Gadus morhua) aggregation: cohort contribution and genetic stability. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 53:2695–2705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai H, Iguchi K, Yamazaki Y, Sideleva VG, Goto A. 2009. Morphological and mtDNA sequence studies on three crucian carps (Carassius: Cyprinidae) including a new stock from the Ob River system, Kazakhstan. J Fish Biol. 74:1756–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaee SM, Mojazi-Amiri B, Hosseini-Mazinani SM. 2006. Comparison of Capoeta capoeta gracilis (Cyprinidae, Teleostei) populations in the south Caspian Sea River basin, using morphometric ratios and genetic markers. Folia Zool. 55:323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sati J, Sah S, Pandey H, Ali S, Sahoo PK, Pande V, Barat A. 2013. Phylogenetic relationship and molecular identification of five Indian Mahseer species using COI sequence. J Environ Biol. 34:933–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma U, Singhal V, Gupta DP, Mohanty PS. 2014. Phylogenetic analysis among Cyprinidae family using 16SrRNA. Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 1:66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha J. 1978. Fish fauna of Nepal. J Nat Hist Mus Tribhuvan Univ. 5:33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Simon KD, Bakar Y, Temple SE, Mazlan AG. 2010. Morphometric and meristic variation in two congeneric archer fishes Toxotes chatareus (Hamilton 1822) and Toxotes jaculatrix (Pallas 1767) inhabiting Malaysian coastal waters. Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol). 11:871–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons AM, Berendzen PB, Mayden RL. 2003. Molecular systematics of North American phoxinin genera (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) inferred from mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Zool J Linnean Soc. 139:63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons AM, Mayden RL. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of the western North American Phoxinins (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) as inferred from mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 9:308–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh KD, Devi W. 2012. Ultra structure study of egg membrane in Osteobrama belangeri Val. J Agri Vet Sci. 1:49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Spain VA, Grant JC, Sinclair FD. 1980. Phenotypic affinities of 11 species of Australian mullet (Pisces: Mugilidae). Aust J Marine Freshwater Res. 31:69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava DK, Tyagi RK. 1979. Morphometric characters of carp minnow Osteobrama cotio (Ham.). Proc Indian Acad Sci. 88:339–344.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss RE, Bookstein FL. 1982. The truss: body from reconstructions in morphometrics. Syst Zool. 31:113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Talwar PK, Jhingran AG. 1991. Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries – Vol. I. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic acids research advance access. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan C. 1999. A note on the examination of morphometric differentiation among fish populations: the truss system. Turk J Zool. 23:259–263.
   Google Scholar
• Veasey EA, Schammass EA, Vencovsky R, Martins PS, Bandel G. 2001. Germplasm characterization of Sesbania accessions based on multivariate analyses. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 48:79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra D. 1890. Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Burmania e regioni vicine. xxiv. Pesci Annali Mus Civ Stor nat Giacomo Doria. 9:129–360.
   Google Scholar
• Vishwanath W. 2010. Osteobrama belangeri. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Online). Version 2014.3. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org
   Google Scholar
• Vishwanath W, Shantakumar M. 2007. Fishes of the genus, Osteobrama Heckel of North Eastern India (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Zoos Print J. 22:2881–2884.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B Biol Sci. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar