Fish DNA barcoding around large marine infrastructure for improved biodiversity assessment and monitoring

References

• Aguirre W, Shervette V. 2005. Morphological diversity of the cynoscion group (Perciformes: Sciaenidae) in the Gulf of Guayaquil region, Ecuador: a comparative approach. Environ Biol Fishes. 73:403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso A, Dallmeier F, Servat G, editors. 2013. Monitoring biodiversity: lessons from a transandean megaproject. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press; p. 429.
   Google Scholar
• Austen G, Bindemann M, Griffiths R. 2016. Species identification by experts and non-experts: comparing images from field guides. Sci Rep. 6. DOI:10.1038/srep33634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa AJB, Sampaio I, Schneider H, Santos S. 2014. Molecular phylogeny of weakfish species of the stellifer group (Sciaenidae, Perciformes) of the Western South Atlantic based on mitochondrial and nuclear data. PLoS One. 9:e102250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerkircher L, Arocha F, Barse A, Prince E. 2009. Effects of species misidentification on population assessment of overfished white marlin Tetrapturus albidus and roundscale spearfish T. georgii. Endanger Species. 9:1–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten J, Bilton D, Fujisawa T, Elliott M. 2012. The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding. Syst Biol. 61:851–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertasi F, Colangelo M, Colosio F, Gregorio G. 2009. Comparing efficacy of different taxonomic resolutions and surrogates in detecting changes in soft bottom assemblages due to coastal defence structures. Mar Pollut Bull. 58:686–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasina G, Molina J, Cazorla A. 2016. Relationship between ecomorphology and trophic segregation in four closely related sympatric fish species (Teleostei, Sciaenidae). C R Biol. 339:498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čandek K, Kuntner M. 2015. DNA barcoding gap: reliable species identification over morphological and geographical scales. Mol Ecol Resour. 15:268–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr MH, Hixon MA. 1997. Artificial reefs: the importance of comparisons with natural reefs. Fisheries. 22:28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirichigno N, Cornejo M. 2001. Catálogo comentado de los peces marinos del Perú [Commented catalog of the marine fish of Peru]. Inst. Callao, Peru: Mar Perú.
   Google Scholar
• Chirichigno NF, Vélez J. 1998. Clave para identificar los peces marinos del Perú [Taxonomical key to identify Peruvian marine fish]. Callao, Peru: Inst. Mar Perú.
   Google Scholar
• Culverhouse P, Williams R, Reguera B, Herry V. 2003. Do experts make mistakes? A comparison of human and machine identification of dinoflagellates. Ecol Prog Ser. 247:17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayrat B. 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol J Linn Soc. 85:407–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deary A. 2015. Ontogeny of the feeding apparatus and sensory modalities: relationship to habitat differentiation among early life history stage drums (Sciaenidae) in the Chesapeake Bay. Williamsburg, Virginia: The College of William and Mary.
   Google Scholar
• Deary AL, Hilton EJ. 2016. Comparative ontogeny of the feeding apparatus of sympatric drums (Perciformes: Sciaenidae) in the Chesapeake Bay. J Morphol. 277:183–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincă V, Zakharov E. 2011. Complete DNA barcode reference library for a country’s butterfly fauna reveals high performance for temperate Europe. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 278:347–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert P, Cywinska A. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert P, Penton E, Burns J. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:14812–14817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMARPE. 2016. Evaluación del POI – PTI al IV Trimestre del 2016: 13. Sede Pisco [Evaluation of the POI – PTI to the Fourth Quarter of 2016. Pisco Headquarters]. [accessed 2016 Sep 22]:[264 p.]. http://www.imarpe.gob.pe/imarpe/archivos/informes/imarpe_evaluacion_plan_operativo_iv_trimestre_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN. 2007. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:544–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaarsveld AV, Freitag S, Chown S, Muller C. 1998. Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science. 279:2106–2108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059–3066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knebelsberger T, Landi M, Neumann H, Kloppmann M, Sell AF, Campbell PD, Laakmann S, Raupach MJ, Carvalho GR, Costa FO. 2014. A reliable DNA barcode reference library for the identification of the North European shelf fish fauna. Mol Ecol Resour. 14:1060–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landeiro V, Bini L, Costa F, Franklin E. 2012. How far can we go in simplifying biomonitoring assessments? An integrated analysis of taxonomic surrogacy, taxonomic sufficiency and numerical resolution in a megadiverse region. Ecol Indic. 23:366–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo P, Liu S, Chao N, Nunoo F, Mok H. 2015. A multi-gene dataset reveals a tropical new world origin and early miocene diversification of croakers (Perciformes: Sciaenidae). Mol Phylogenet. 88:132–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace G. 2004. The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 359:711–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer CP, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3:e422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda JR, Mouillot D, Hernandez DF, Lopez AS, Do Chi T, Perez LA. 2005. Changes in four complementary facets of fish diversity in a tropical coastal lagoon after 18 years: a functional interpretation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 304:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirimin L, Kerwath S, Macey B. 2014. Identification of naturally occurring hybrids between two overexploited sciaenid species along the South African Coast. Mol Phylogenet. 76:30–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson J, Grande T, Wilson M. 2016. Fishes of the world. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira LM, Knebelsberger T, Landi M, Soares P, Raupach MJ, Costa FO. 2016. Assembling and auditing a comprehensive DNA barcode reference library for European marine fishes. J Fish Biol. 89:2741–2754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 20:289–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckridge M, Andreakis N, Appleyard SA, Ward RD. 2013. Cryptic diversity in flathead fishes (Scorpaeniformes: Platycephalidae) across the Indo-West Pacific uncovered by DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour. 13:32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. 2012. ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 21:1864–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radulovici A, Archambault P, Dufresne F. 2010. DNA barcodes for marine biodiversity: moving fast forward? Diversity. 2:450–472.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. BARCODING: bold: the barcode of life data system (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2013. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS One. 8:e66213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos S, Gomes MdF. 2013. Molecular phylogeny of the western South Atlantic Sciaenidae based on mitochondrial and nuclear data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 66:423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea CP, Peterson JT, Wisniewski JM, Johnson NA. 2011. Misidentification of freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionidae): contributing factors, management implications, and potential solutions. J N Am Benthol Soc. 30:446–458.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 22:2688–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team R. 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. [accessed 2017 Jan 23]. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Tringali M, Seyoum S, Higham M. 2011. A dispersal-dependent zone of introgressive hybridization between weakfish, Cynoscion regalis, and sand seatrout, C. arenarius (Sciaenidae) in the Florida Atlantic. J Hered. 102:416–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward R, Zemlak T, Innes B. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD. 2009. DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes. Mol Ecol Resour. 9:1077–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD. 2012. FISH-BOL, a case study for DNA Barcodes. In: DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. p. 423–439.
   Google Scholar
• Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 33:475–505.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemers M, Fiedler K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? A case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Front Zool. 4:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will KW, Rubinoff D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics. 20:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson KA, Auerbach NA, Sam K, Magini AG, Moss ASL, Langhans SD, Budiharta S, Terzano D, Meijaard E. 2016. Conservation research is not happening where it is most needed. PLoS Biol. 14:e1002413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Tang D, Cheng Y, Wang R. 2014. Mitogenomic perspectives into sciaenid fishes' phylogeny and evolution origin in the New World. Gene. 539:91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassin A, Markow T, Narechania A. 2010. The genus Drosophila as a model for testing tree- and character-based methods of species identification using DNA barcoding. Mol Phylogenet. 57:509–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT-Y. 2017. ggtree: an r package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 8:28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Hanner R. 2012. Molecular approach to the identification of fish in the South China Sea. PLoS One. 7:e30621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar