A cross-talk on compositional dynamics and codon usage patterns of mitochondrial CYB gene in Echinodermata

References

• Amemiya CT, Miyake T, Rast JP. 2005. Echinoderms. Curr Biol. 15:R944–R946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amos W, Harwood J. 1998. Factors affecting levels of genetic diversity in natural populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 353:177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreu AL, Hanna MG, Reichmann H, Bruno C, Penn AS, Tanji K, Pallotti F, Iwata S, Bonilla E, Lach B, et al. 1999. Exercise intolerance due to mutations in the cytochrome b gene of mitochondrial DNA. N Engl J Med. 341:1037–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeza M, Alcaíno J, Barahona S, Sepúlveda D, Cifuentes V. 2015. Codon usage and codon context bias in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. BMC Genomics. 16:293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes DK, Brockington S. 2003. Zoobenthic biodiversity, biomass and abundance at Adelaide Island, Antarctica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 249:145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belalov IS, Lukashev AN. 2013. Causes and implications of codon usage bias in RNA viruses. PLoS One. 8:e56642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennetzen JL, Hall BD. 1982. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem. 257:3026–3031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 277:1453–1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blow JJ, Laskey RA. 1988. A role for the nuclear envelope in controlling DNA replication within the cell cycle. Nature. 332:546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkman K, ter Hofstede HJM, Burger DM, Smeitink JAM, Koopmans PP. 1998. Adverse effects of reverse transcriptase inhibitors: mitochondrial toxicity as common pathway. Aids. 12:1735–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton RE, Milam JE, Roe BA. 2001. The complete sequence of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) mitochondrial genome and evolutionary patterns in vertebrate mitochondrial DNA. Genome Res. 11:1958–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer M. 1991. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 129:897–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt AM, Nasrullah I, Tong Y. 2014. Genome-wide analysis of codon usage and influencing factors in chikungunya viruses. PloS One. 9:e90905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S, Nag D, Mazumder TH, Uddin A. 2017. Codon usage pattern and prediction of gene expression level in Bungarus species. Gene. 604:48–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandel NS, McClintock DS, Feliciano CE, Wood TM, Melendez JA, Rodriguez AM, Schumacker PT. 2000. Reactive oxygen species generated at mitochondrial complex III stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor-1α during hypoxia a mechanism of O2 sensing. J Biol Chem. 275:25130–25138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Sun S, Norenburg JL, Sundberg P. 2014. Mutation and selection cause codon usage and bias in mitochondrial genomes of ribbon worms (Nemertea). PloS One. 9:e85631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y. 2013. A comparison of synonymous codon usage bias patterns in DNA and RNA virus genomes: quantifying the relative importance of mutational pressure and natural selection. BioMed Res Int. 2013:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello H, Lisacek F, Caboche M, Hénaut A. 1998. Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 209:GC1–GC38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury MN, Chakraborty S. 2015. Codon usage pattern in human SPANX genes. Bioinformation. 11:454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury MN, Uddin A, et al. 2017a. Nucleotide composition and codon usage bias of SRY gene. Andrologia. 50(1). doi:10.1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury MN, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. 2017b. Codon usage bias and its influencing factors for Y-linked genes in human.Comput Biol Chem.69:77–86. doi:10.1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury MN, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. 2017c. Gene expression, nucleotide composition and codon usage bias of genes associated with human Y chromosome. Genetica. 145:295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, Ding H, Koh JLY, Toufighi K, Mostafavi S, et al. 2010. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science. 327:425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Reis M, Wernisch L, et al. 2003. Unexpected correlations between gene expression and codon usage bias from microarray data for the whole Escherichia coli K‐12 genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6976–6985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle MA, Morais CJ, Pfuetzner RA, Kuo A, Gulbis JM, Cohen SL, Chait BT, Mackinnon R. 1998. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K + conduction and selectivity. Science. 280:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell. 134:341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan J, Wainwright MS, et al. 2003. Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor. Hum Mol Genet. 12:205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan X, Yi S, Guo X, Wang W. 2015. A comprehensive analysis of codon usage patterns in blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) based on RNA-Seq data. Int J Mol Sci. 16:11996–12013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duret L. 2002. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 12:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duret L, Mouchiroud D. 1999. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:4482–4487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evan GI, Vousden KH. 2001. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature. 411:342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Smouse PE, et al. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 131:479–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlgren N, Montgomery TA, Howell MD, Allen E, Dvorak SK, Alexander AL, Carrington JC. 2006. Regulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 by TAS3 ta-siRNA affects developmental timing and patterning in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 16:939–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert C, Ropiquet A, Hassanin A. 2006. Mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies of Cervidae (Mammalia, Ruminantia): systematics, morphology, and biogeography. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:101–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogarten JP, Doolittle WF, Lawrence JG. 2002. Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol. 19:2226–2238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RE, Krause J, Briggs AW, Maricic T, Stenzel U, Kircher M, Patterson N, Li H, Zhai W, Fritz MH-Y, et al. 2010. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science. 328:710–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamanaka RB, Chandel NS. 2010. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species regulate cellular signaling and dictate biological outcomes. Trends Biochem Sci. 35:505–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl DL, Clark AG, et al. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Vol. 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinaur Associates Inc Publishers; p. 151-158.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward AD, Wilson AJ, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB. 2009. Ageing in a variable habitat: environmental stress affects senescence in parasite resistance in St Kilda Soay sheep. Proc Biol Sci. 276:3477–3485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberg R, Petrov DA. 2008. Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet. 42:287–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey J, Kliman RM. 2002. Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. Genetics. 160:595–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp TP, Woods KR. 1981. Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 78:3824–3828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue JG, Miya M, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M. 2003. Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the ancient fish. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 26:110–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409:860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonski D. 2005. Evolutionary innovations in the fossil record: the intersection of ecology, development, and macroevolution. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol. 304B:504–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins GM, Holmes EC. 2003. The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA viruses and its evolutionary origin. Virus Res. 92:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon H-K, Kim K-H, Eom KS. 2007. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Taenia saginata: comparison with T. solium and T. asiatica. Parasitol Int. 56:243–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson OP, Haydon D. 1999. The genetic code: what is it good for? An analysis of the effects of selection pressures on genetic codes. J Mol Evol. 49:539–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamau E, Charlesworth D. 2005. Balancing selection and low recombination affect diversity near the self-incompatibility loci of the plant Arabidopsis lyrata. Curr Biol. 15:1773–1778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES. 2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature. 423:241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight RD, Freeland SJ, et al. 2001. A simple model based on mutation and selection explains trends in codon and amino-acid usage and GC composition within and across genomes. Genome Biol. 2(4):research0010. 0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober KM, Pogson GH. 2013. Genome-wide patterns of codon bias are shaped by natural selection in the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. G3. 3:1069–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Abbas AK, et al. 2014. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease, professional edition e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.1408:880–883.
   Google Scholar
• Kyte J, Doolittle RF. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol Biol. 157:105–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence JG, Ochman H. 1998. Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:9413–9417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Pogany J, Panavas T, Xu K, Esposito AM, Kinzy TG, Nagy PD. 2009. Translation elongation factor 1A is a component of the tombusvirus replicase complex and affects the stability of the p33 replication co-factor. Virology. 385:245–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MT, Beal MF. 2006. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature. 443:787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, Clamp M, Chang JL, Kulbokas EJ, Zody MC, et al. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 438:803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y-s, Zhou J-h, Chen H-t, Ma L-n, Ding Y-z, Wang M, Zhang J. 2010. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Infect Genet Evol. 10:797–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobry J, Gautier C. 1994. Hydrophobicity, expressivity and aromaticity are the major trends of amino-acid usage in 999 Escherichia coli chromosome-encoded genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3174–3180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder GA, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. 2017. Expression levels and codon usage patterns in nuclear genes of the filarial nematode Wucheraria bancrofti and the blood fluke Schistosoma haematobium. J Helminthol. 91:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder GA, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. 2018. Codon usage pattern of complex III gene of respiratory chain among platyhelminths. Infect Genet Evol. 57:128–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder GA, Uddin A, et al. 2015. Prediction of gene expression and codon usage in human parasitic helminths. Genes Genomics. 1–10. doi:1007/s13258-015-0381-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride HM, Neuspiel M, Wasiak S. 2006. Mitochondria: more than just a powerhouse. Curr Biol. 16:R551–R560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan NR, Gatherer D. 1998. The mutational-response index and codon bias in genes from a Frankia nif operon. Theor Appl Genet. 96:716–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKitrick MC. 1993. Phylogenetic constraint in evolutionary theory: has it any explanatory power? Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 24:307–330.
   Google Scholar
• Modica-Napolitano J, Kulawiec M, Singh K. 2007. Mitochondria and human cancer. Curr Mol Med. 7:121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz C, Dowling TE, Brown WM. 1987. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18:269–292.
   Google Scholar
• Orešič M, Dehn MHH, Korenblum DHH, Shalloway DHH. 2003. Tracing specific synonymous codon–secondary structure correlations through evolution. J Mol Evol. 56:473–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osawa S, Jukes TH, Watanabe K, Muto A. 1992. Recent evidence for evolution of the genetic code. Microbiol Rev. 56:229–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page RD, Holmes EC. 2009. Molecular evolution: a phylogenetic approach. Vol. 335.John Wiley & Sons; p. 224-228.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson DL. 2007. Phylum echinodermata. Zootaxa. 1668:749–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman P, Johnson WE, Roos C, Seuánez HN, Horvath JE, Moreira MAM, Kessing B, Pontius J, Roelke M, Rumpler Y, et al. 2011. A molecular phylogeny of living primates. PLoS Genet. 7:e1001342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotkin JB, Kudla G. 2011. Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat Rev Genet. 12:32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyak K, Li Y, Zhu H, Lengauer C, Willson JKV, Markowitz SD, Trush MA, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. 1998. Somatic mutations of the mitochondrial genome in human colorectal tumours. Nat Genet. 20:291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott DM. 1994. The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev. 58:233–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Presgraves DC. 2005. Recombination enhances protein adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol. 15:1651–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Pickrell JK, Coop G. 2010. The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr Biol. 20:R208–R215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran W, Kristensen DM, et al. 2014. Coupling between protein level selection and codon usage optimization in the evolution of bacteria and archaea. MBio. 5:e00956–e00914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randi E. 1996. A mitochondrial cytochrome B phylogeny of the Alectoris partridges. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 6:214–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razin S, Yogev D, et al. 1998. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 62:1094–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode KD, Amstrup SC, Regehr EV. 2010. Reduced body size and cub recruitment in polar bears associated with sea ice decline. Ecol Appl. 20:768–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero H, Zavala A, et al. 2000. Codon usage in Chlamydia trachomatis is the result of strand-specific mutational biases and a complex pattern of selective forces. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2084–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieber M, Chandel NS. 2014. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol. 24:R453–R462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon EA, DiMauro S, Hirano M. 2012. Human mitochondrial DNA: roles of inherited and somatic mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 13:878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz DW, Yarus M. 1994. Transfer RNA mutation and the malleability of the genetic code. J Mol Biol. 235(5):1377–1380.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Bailes E, et al. 2005. Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1141–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Emery LR, Zeng K. 2010. Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365:1203–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li W-H. 1986a. Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for 'rare' codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:7737–7749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li W-H. 1986b. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol. 24:28–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li W-H. 1987. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1281–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon HU, Haj-Yehia A, Levi-Schaffer F. 2000. Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction. Apoptosis. 5:415–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Davidson EH, Cameron RA, Gibbs RA, Angerer RC, Angerer LM, Arnone MI, Burgess DR, Burke RD, et al. 2006. The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Science. 314:941–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenico M, Lloyd AT, Sharp PM. 1994. Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2437–2446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöhr H, Berger C, Fröhlich S, Weber BHF. 2002. A novel gene encoding a putative transmembrane protein with two extracellular CUB domains and a low-density lipoprotein class A module: isolation of alternatively spliced isoforms in retina and brain. Gene. 286:223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathmann RR. 1978. The evolution and loss of feeding larval stages of marine invertebrates. Evolution. 32:894–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueoka N. 1995. Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol. 40:318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sur S, Sen A, et al. 2007. Mutational drift prevails over translational efficiency in Frankia nif operons. Indian JMicrobiol. 46(4):363–369.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe JG. 1978. Nucleotide sequence of the ampicillin resistance gene of Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 75:3737–3741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telford MJ, Herniou EA, Russell RB, Littlewood DTJ. 2000. Changes in mitochondrial genetic codes as phylogenetic characters: two examples from the flatworms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:11359–11364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita M, Hashimoto K, Takahashi K, Shimizu T, Matsuzaki Y, Miyoshi F, Saito K, Tanida S, Yugi K, Venter J, et al. 1999. E-CELL: software environment for whole-cell simulation. Bioinformatics. 15:72–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turrens JF. 2003. Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J Physiol. 552:335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin A, Chakraborty S. 2015. Synonymous codon usage pattern in mitochondrial CYB gene in pisces, aves, and mammals. Mitochondrial DNA. 28(2):187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin A, Chakraborty S. 2016. Codon usage trend in mitochondrial CYB gene. Gene. 586:105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin A, Choudhury MN, Chakraborty S. 2018. Codon usage bias and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial ND1 gene in pisces, aves, and mammals. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 29:36–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin A, Choudhury MN, Chakraborty S. 2016. Codon usage bias and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial ND1 gene in pisces, aves, and mammals. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 29(1):36–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin A, Mazumder TH, Choudhury MN, Chakraborty S. 2015. Codon bias and gene expression of mitochondrial ND2 gene in chordates. Bioinformation. 11:407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uthicke S, Schaffelke B, Byrne M. 2009. A boom–bust phylum? Ecological and evolutionary consequences of density variations in echinoderms. Ecol Monogr. 79:3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinogradov AE. 2001. Intron length and codon usage. J Mol Evol. 52:2–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissig V. 2003. Mitochondrial-targeted drug and DNA delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 20:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GC. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution. 11:398–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray GA. 1994. The evolution of cell lineage in echinoderms. Am Zoologist. 34:353–363.
   Google Scholar
• Wright F. 1990. The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene. 87:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N,  Pedersen AM. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics. 155:431–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li W-H. 2004. Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:236–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Dai W, Dai D. 2013. Synonymous codon usage in TTSuV2: analysis and comparison with TTSuV1. PloS One. 8:e81469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Gu W, Ma J, Sun X, Lu Z. 2005. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in H5N1 virus and other influenza A viruses. Biosystems. 81:77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar