Evidence for a species complex in Indialona ganapati (Chydoridae)

References

• Adamowicz SJ, Hebert PDN, Marinone MC. 2004. Species diversity and endemism in the Daphnia of Argentina: a genetic investigation. Zool J Linn Soc. 140:171–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnfield AJ. 2003. Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat Island. Int J Climatol. 23:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaeva M, Taylor DJ. 2009. Cryptic species within the Chydorus sphaericus species complex (Crustacea: Cladocera) revealed by molecular markers and sexual stage morphology. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 50:534–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucklin A, Ortman BD, Jennings RM, Nigro LM, Sweetman CJ, Copley NJ, Sutton T, Wiebe PH. 2010. A “Rosetta Stone” for metazoan zooplankton: DNA barcode analysis of species diversity of the Sargasso Sea (Northwest Atlantic Ocean). Top Stud Oceanogr Deep-Sea Res. Part II 57:2234–2247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee T, Kotov AA, Van Damme K, Chandrasekhar SVA, Padhye S. 2013. An annotated checklist of the Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from India. Zootaxa. 3667(1):1–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbourne JK, Wilson CC, Hebert PDN. 2006. The systematics of Australian Daphnia and Daphniopsis (Crustacea: Cladocera): a shared phylogenetic history transformed by habitat-specific rates of evolution. Biol J Linn Soc. 89:469–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa FO, Dewaard JR, Boutillier J, Ratnasingham S, Dooh RT, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN. 2007. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes: the case of the Crustacea. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci. 64:272–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottenie K. 2005. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett. 8:1175–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elías-Gutiérrez M, Valdez-Moreno M. 2008. A new cryptic species of Leberis smirnov, 1989 (Crustacea, Cladocera, Chydoridae) from the Mexican semi-desert region, highlighted by DNA barcoding. Hidrobiologica. 18:63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplifcation of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 3:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forro L, Korovchinsky NM, Kotov A, Petrusek A. 2008. Global diversity of cladocerans (Cladocera; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia. 595:177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Morales AE, Gutierrez ME. 2013. DNA barcoding of freshwater Rotifera in Mexico: evidence of cryptic speciation in common rotifers. Mol Ecol Resour. 13:1097–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Moreno J. 2004. Is there a universal mtDNA clock for birds? J Avian Biol. 35:465–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez A, Serra M, Carvalho GR, Lunt DH. 2002. Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Evolution. 56:1431–1444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science. 319:756–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Singer GAC, Hebert PDN, Hickey DA. 2007. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends Genet. 23:167–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol. 54:852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101:14812–14817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, Waard D, Jr. 2003. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc B. 270:96–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heber PDN, Taylor DJ. 1997. The future of cladoceran genetics: methodologies and targets. Hydrobiologia. 360:295–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN. 1987. Genotypic characteristics of the Cladocera. Hydrobiologia. 145:183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN. 1998. Variable environments and evolutionary diversification in inland waters. In: Carvalho GR, editor. Advances in molecular ecology. IOS Press: Amsterdam; p.267–290.
   Google Scholar
• Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Cooper A, Drummond AJ. 2005. Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1561–1568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong HG, Sinev AY, Brancelj A, Chang KH, Kotov AA. 2017. A new blind groundwater-dwelling genus of the Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from the Korean Peninsula. Zootaxa. 4341:451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karuthapandi M, Rao DV. 2016. Cladoceran diversity, distribution and ecological significance. In: Chakravarthy AK, Sridhara S, editors. Arthropod diversity and conservation in the tropics and sub-tropics. Singapore: Springer Science + Business Media; p.183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye JP, Groffman PM, Grimm NB, Baker LA, Pouyat RV. 2006. A distinct urban biogeochemistry? Trends Ecol Evol (Amst). 21:192–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedkar GD, Jamdade R, Naik S, David L, Haymer D. 2014. DNA barcodes for the fishes of the Narmada, one of India’s longest rivers. PLoS ONE. 9(7):e101460.
   Google Scholar
• Khedkar GD, Abhayankar SB, Nalage D, Ahmed SN, Khedkar CD. 2016a. DNA barcode based wildlife forensics for resolving the origin of claw samples using a novel primer cocktail. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 27:3932–3935.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khedkar GD, Tiknaik A, Kalyankar AD, Reddy C, Khedkar CD, Ron TB, Hayme D. 2016b. Genetic structure of populations and conservation issues relating to an endangered catfish, Clarias batrachus, in India. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 27:1181–1187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korinek V. 2002. Cladocera. In: Fernando CH, editor. A guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton. Leiden: Bachuys Publications; p.69–122.
   Google Scholar
• Korovchinsky NM. 2006. The Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) as a relict group. Zool J Linn Soc. 147:109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov AA, Gololobova MA. 2016. Traditional taxonomy: Quo vadis? Integr Zool. 11:490–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov AA, Ishida S, Taylor DJ. 2009. Revision of the genus Bosmina Baird, 1845 (Cladocera: Bosminidae), based on evidence from male morphological characters and molecular phylogenies. Zool J Linn Soc. 156:1–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov AA, Stifter P. 2006. Cladocera: Family Ilyocryptidae (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Anomopoda). In: Dumont HJF, editor. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World. Leiden: Backhuys publishers; p.1–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kotov AA. 2000. Redescription and assignment of the chydorid Indialona ganapati Petkovski, 1966 (Branchiopoda: Anomopoda: Aloninae) to Indialonini, new tribus. Hydrobiologia. 439:161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logue JB, Mouquet N, Peter H, Hillebrand H. 2011. Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol Evol (Amst). 26:482–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louette G, Meester L. D. 2005. High dispersal capacity of cladoceran zooplankton in newly founded communities. Ecology. 86:353–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovette IJ. 2004. Mitochondrial dating and mixed-support for the ‘2% rule’ in birds. Auk. 121:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael RG, Sharma BK. 1988. Fauna of India and adjacent countries: Indian Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Cladocera). Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India.
   Google Scholar
• Penny D. 2005. Evolutionary biology: relativity for molecular clocks. Nature. 436:183–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petkovski TK. 1966. Eineneue cladoceren-gattun gausdem Westen Indiens Indialona ganapati n. gen. et n. sp. [A New Cladoceran Genus from the West of India Indialona Ganapati]. Fragm Balcan Maced Sci Nat. 5:157–165. German.
   Google Scholar
• Rane PD. 1992. New distributional record for Indialona ganapati, petkovski (Crustacea: Cladocera) from Ujani wetland Maharastra with first description of male and reproductive female. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 89:263–265.
   Google Scholar
• Rane PD. 2002. Cladocera crustacean, Wetland ecosystem series no.3: Fauna of Ujani. Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India; p.71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. BOLD: The barcode of life data system (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha RK, Biswas A, Goswami UC. 2011. A simple method for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study of Cladocera: Bosmina (Bosmina) tripurae. WJFMS. 3:71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma BK, Michael RG. 1987. Review of taxonomic studies on freshwater Cladocera from India with remarks on biogeography. Hydrobiologia. 145:29–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma BK, Sharma S. 2017. Crustacea: Branchiopoda (Cladocera), In: Chandra Kailash, Gopi KC, Rao DV, Valarmathi K., Alfred JRB, editors. 14, Current status of freshwater faunal diversity in India. Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India; p.199–223.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Kotov AA. 2013. Molecular approach to identify sibling species of the Ceriodaphnia cornuta complex (Cladocera: Daphniidae) from Australia with notes on the continental endemism of this group. Zootaxa. 3702:79–089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov NN, Kotov AA. 2010. The morphological radiation of setae in the Cladocera (Crustacea) and their potential for morphogenesis. Internet Rev Hydrobiol. 95:482–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov NN. 2014. Physiology of the Cladocera. London: Academic Press, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Panarelli EA. 2017. The amazing diversity of the genus Monospilus Sars, 1862 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Aloninae) in South America. Zootaxa. 4242:467–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DJ, Hebert PDN. 1993. Cryptic intercontinental hybridization in Daphnia (Crustacea)-the ghost of introductions past. Proc R Soc Lond B. 254:163–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentini A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2009. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol Evol (Amst). 24:110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme K, Brancelj A, Dumont HJ. 2009. Adaptations to the hyporheic in Aloninae (Crustacea: Cladocera): allocation of Alona protzi Hartwig, 1900 and related species to Phreatalona gen. nov. Hydrobiologia. 618:1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van damme K, Kotov AA, Dumont HJ. 2010. A checklist of names in Alona Baird 1843 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae) and their current status: an analysis of the taxonomy of a lump genus. Zootaxa. 2330:1–63.
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme K, Sinev AY, Dumont HG. 2011. Separation of Anthalona gen. n. from Alona Baird, 1843 (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Anomopoda): morphology and evolution of scraping stenothermic alonines. Zootaxa. 2875:1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Vernooy R, Haribabu E, Muller MR, Vogel JH, Hebert PDN, Schindel DE, Shimura J, Singer GAC. 2010. Barcoding life to conserve biological diversity: beyond the taxonomic imperative. Plos Biol. 8:e1000417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weismann, A. 1880. Beitriige zur Naturgeschichte der Daphnoiden. VI. Samen und Begattung der Daphnoiden. Z wiss Zool. 33:55–256.
   Google Scholar