268
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The once and future internet: infrastructural tragedy and ambiguity in the case of IPv6

Pages 55-74 | Received 19 Dec 2017, Accepted 19 Mar 2018, Published online: 05 Apr 2018

References

  • Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bay, M. (2017). What is “internet”? The case for the proper noun and why it is important. Internet Histories, 1(3), 203–218.
  • Bowker, G., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, and M. Allen (Eds.), International handbook of internet research (pp. 97–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Bowker, G., & Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Braman, S. (2012). The framing years: Policy fundamentals in the internet design process, 1969–1979. The Information Society, 27, 295–310.
  • Braman, S. (2016). Instability and internet design. Internet Policy Review, 5(3), 1–18.
  • Casado, M., Koponen, T., Shenker, S., & Tootoonchian, A. (2012). Fabric: A retrospective on evolving SDN. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks (HotSDN ’12), 85–90, New York, NY: ACM.
  • Cerf, V., & Kahn, R. (1974). A protocol for packet network intercommunication. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 22(5), 637–648.
  • Chun, W. (2016). Updating to remain the same: Habitual new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Coffman, K. G., & Odlyzko, A. M. (1999). The size and growth rate of the Internet (Technical Report 99-11, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science.
  • Constant, E. (1999). Social locus of practice. In Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, & Trevor Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Czyz, J., Allman, M., Zhang, J., Iekel-Johnson, S., Osterweil, E., & Bailey, M. (2014). Measuring IPv6 adoption. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Communications SIGCOMM’14 (pp. 87–98). Chicago, IL, New York, NY: ACM.
  • Deering, S., & Hinden, R. (1995). Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification. Request for Comments RFC 1883. Internet Engineering Task Force. Retreived from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1883, November 2017.
  • DeNardis, L. (2006). IPv6: Politics of the next generation internet (Doctoral dissertation), Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
  • Dhamdhere, A., Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., Klaffy, K., Elmoksahfi, A., & Aben, E. (2012). Measuring the deployment of IPv6: Topology, routing, and performance. Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference IMC’12 (pp–pp). Boston, MA, November. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Dourish, P. (2017). The stuff of bits: An essay on the materialities of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Egevang, K., & Francis, P. (1994). The IP network address translator (NAT). Request for Comments RFC 1631. Internet Engineering Task Force. Retreived from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1631, November 2017.
  • Fuller, V., Li, T., Yu, J., & Varadhan, K. (1993 ). Classless inter-domain routing (CIDR): An address assignment and aggregation strategy. Request for Comments RFC 1519. Network Working Group. Retreived from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1519, November 2017.
  • Gillespie, T. (2006). Engineering a principle: “End-to-End” in the design of the internet. Social Studies of Science, 36(3), 427–457.
  • Giotsas, V., Lucki, M., Huffaker, B., & Claffy, K. (2015). IPv6 AS relationships, cliques, and congruence. In Mirkovic and Liu (Eds.), Passive and active network measurement workshop (PAM), LNCS 8995 (pp. 111–122). Berlin: Springer.
  • Honda, M., Nishida, Y., Rauciu, C., Greenhalgh, A., Handley, M., & Tokuda, H. (2011). Is it still possible to extend TCP? Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference IMC’11 (pp. 181–192), New York, NY: ACM.
  • Jacobson, V. (1988). Congestion avoidance and control. In Symposium Proceedings on Communications Architectures and Protocols (SIGCOMM '88) (pp. 314–329), New York, NY: ACM.
  • Karpilovsky, E., Gerber, A., Pei, D., Rexford, J., & Shaikh, A. (2009). Quantifying the extent of IPv6 deployment. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Passive and Active Network Management PAM 2009 (pp. 13–22). Seoul, South Korea, Berlin: Springer.
  • Kirkpatrick, K. (2013). Software-defined networking. Communications of the ACM, 56(9), 16–19.
  • Koponen, T., Casado, M., Gude, N., Stribling, J., Poutievski, L., Zhu, M., … Shenker, S. (2010). Onix: A distributed control platform for large-scale production networks. Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI’10) (pp. 351–364), New York, NY: ACM.
  • Lampland, M., & Star, S. L. (2009). Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Leavitt, N. (2011, September). IPv6: Any closer to adoption? IEEE Computer, 44(9). 14–16.
  • Levin, S., & Schmidt, S. (2014). IPv4 to IPv6: Challenges, solutions, and lessons. Telecommunications Policy, 38, 1059–1068.
  • Livadariu, I., Benson, K., Elmokashfi, A., Dainotti, A., & Dhamdhere, A. (2018). Inferring carrier-grade NAT deployment in the wild. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Honolulu, HI, April. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Mailland, J. (2016). 101 online: American Minitel network and lessons from its failure. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 38(1), 6–22.
  • Martin, A., & Lynch, M. (2009). Counting things and people: The practices and politics of counting. Social Problems, 56(2), 243–266.
  • Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths., London: Anthem Press.
  • Monteiro, E. (1998). Scaling information infrastructure: The case of next-generation IP in the internet. The Information Society, 14, 229–245.
  • Mueller, M. (2002). Ruling the root: Internet governance and the taming of cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). Why users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Postel, J. (1978). Draft internetwork protocol specification, version 2. Marina Del Rey, CA: IEN 28, Information Sciences Institute.
  • Postel, J. (Ed.). (1980). DoD standard internet protocol. Request for Comments RFC 760. Retreived from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc760, November 2017.
  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Saltzer, J., Reed, D., & Clark, D. (1984). End-to-end arguments in system design. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2(4), 277–288.
  • Shilton, K. (2017). Engaging values despite neutrality: Challenges and approaches to values reflection during the design of internet infrastructure. Science, Technology & Human Values. doi:10.1177/0162243917714869
  • Steinberg, D., & Cheshire, S. (2010). Zero configuration networking: The definitive guide. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
  • Tsuchiya, P., & Eng, T. (1993). Extending the IP internet through address reuse. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 23(1), 16–33.
  • Vatin, F. (2013). Valuation as evaluating and valorizing. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 31–50.
  • Vosoughi, S., Mohsenvand, M., & Roy, D. (2017). Rumor Gauge: Predicting the veracity of rumors on Twitter. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 11(4), 36pp.
  • Wajcman, J. (2014). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Zhang, L., Afanasyev, A., Burke, J., Jacobson, V., Claffy, K. C., Crowley, P., … Zhang, B. (2014). Named data networking. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 44(3), 66–73.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.