The effect of instream logs on bank erosion potential: a flume study with multiple logs

References

• Abbe TB, Montgomery DR. 1996. Large wood debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated rivers. Regul Rivers: Res Manage. 12(23):201–221.
   Google Scholar
• Abbe TB, Montgomery DR. 2003. Patterns and processes of wood debris accumulation in the Queets river basin, Washington. Geomorphology 51(1–3):81–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auteri F, Belan M, Gibertini G, Grassi D. 2008. Normal flat plates in tandem: An experimental investigation. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodyn. 96(6/7):872–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azinfar H, Kells JA. 2007. Backwater effect due to a single spur dike. Can J Civ Eng.Engineering 34(1):107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azinfar H, Kells JA. 2011. Drag force and associated backwater effect due to an open channel spur dike field. J Hydraul Res. 49(2):248–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman PW, Zdravkovich MM. 1978. Flow around a circular cylinder near a plane boundary. J Fluid Mech. 89(1):33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilby RE. 1984. Removal of woody debris may affect stream channel stability. J Forest. 82(10):609–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokaian A, Geoola F. 1984. Wake-induced galloping of two interfering circular cylinders. J Fluid Mech.Mechanics 146:383–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg D, Rutherfurd I, Stewardson M. 2007. The geomorphic and ecological effectiveness of habitat rehabilitation works: continuous measurement of scour and fill around large logs in sand-bed streams. Geomorphology 89(1/2):205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry J, Beschta RL. 1989. Coarse woody debris and channel morphology: a flume study. J Am Water Resources Assoc. 25(5):1031–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Clark LA, Wynn TM. 2007. Methods for determining streambank critical shear stress and soil erodibility: implications for erosion rate predictions. Amer Soc Agric Biol Eng. 50(1):95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper KR. 1974. Wind tunnel measurements of the steady aerodynamic forces on a smooth circular cylinder immersed in the wake of an identical cylinder. National Research Council of Canada. LTR–LA–119.
   Google Scholar
• Collins BD, Montgomery DR. 2002. Forest development, wood jams, and restoration of floodplain rivers in the Puget lowland, Washington. Restor Ecol. 10(2):237– 247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins BD, Montgomery DR, Haas AD. 2002. Historical changes in the distribution and functions of large wood in Puget Lowland rivers. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 59(1):66–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels MD, Rhoads BL. 2003. Influence of a large woody debris obstruction on three-dimensional flow structure in a meander bend. Geomorphology 51(1–3):159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich WE, Whiting PJ. 1989. Boundary shear stress and sediment transport in river meanders of sand and gravel. River Meandering. 12:1–50.
   Google Scholar
• DSE. 2004. Ecological vegetation class benchmarks of the Murray fans bioregion. Melbourne: The Department of Sustainability and Environments, Victorian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley SJ, Fischenich JC, Abt SR. 1998. Effect of woody debris entrapment on flow resistance. J Am Water Resourc Assoc. 34(5):1189–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gippel CJ. 1995. Environmental hydraulics of large woody debris in streams and rivers. J Environ Eng. 121(5):388–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gippel CJ, O'Neill IC, Finlayson BL. 1992. The hydraulic basis of snag management. Melbourne: Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Gippel CJ, O'Neill IO, Finlayson BL, Schnats I. 1996. Hydraulic guidelines for the re-introduction and management of large woody debris in lowland rivers. Regulated rivers. Res Manage. 12(2/3):223–236.
   Google Scholar
• Gurnell AM, Piegay H, Swanson FJ, Gregory SV. 2002. Large wood and fluvial processes. Freshw Biol. 47(4):601–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MA, Reid I. 1990. The influence of microform bed roughness elements on flow and sediment transport in gravel bed rivers. Earth Surf Process Landforms 15(8):739–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes V. 2011. Hydraulic habitat in the River Murray: the influence of geomorphology and large wood [PhD thesis]. Australia: University of Canberra
   Google Scholar
• Igarashi T. 1981. Characteristics of the flow around two circular cylinders arranged in tandem: 1st report. Bulletin of JSME. 24(188):323–331.
   Google Scholar
• Keller EA, Swanson FJ. 1979. Effect of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surf Process. 4(4):361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knighton DW, Macdonald JA. 1979. Hydraulic resistance of artificial strip roughness. J Hydraul Div. 105(6):675–690.
   Google Scholar
• Koehn JD, Nicol SJ, Fairbrother PS. 2004. Spatial arrangement and physical characteristics of structural woody habitat in a lowland river in south-eastern Australia. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 14(5):457–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RM, Shen HW. 1973. Effect of tall vegetations on flow and sediment. J Hydraul Div. 99(5):793–814.
   Google Scholar
• Lin WJ, Lin C, Hsieh SC, Dey S. 2009. Flow characteristics around a circular cylinder placed horizontally above a plane boundary. J Eng Mech. 135(7):697–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CH, Chen JM. 2002. Observations of hysteresis in flow around two square cylinders in a tandem arrangement. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodyn. 90(9):1019–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long T, Cai Z. 2012. Fluid mechanics. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh N. 2003. Large woody debris loading, distribution and scour hole formation in lowland streams [PhD thesis]. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• May CL, Gresswell RE. 2003. Large wood recruitment and redistribution in headwater streams in the southern Oregon Coast Range, U.S.A. Can J Res. 33(8):1352–1362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris AE, Goebel PC, Palik BJ. 2010. Spatial distribution of lager wood jams in streams related to stream-valley geomorphology and forest age in Northern Michigan. River Res Appl.26(7):835–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris HM. 1955. Flow in rough conduits. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng. 120(1):373–398.
   Google Scholar
• Mott RL, Noor FM, Aziz AA. 2006. Applied fluid mechanics. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nagai S, Kurata K. 1971. Interference between cylinders in open channel flow. Proc Japan Soc Civil Eng.1971(196):57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nearmap. 2013. Boiling Down Creek, 36°1’37”S, 146°19’20”E, elevation 136.7 m. Photomap, vertical layer. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. http://maps.au.nearmap.com.
   Google Scholar
• Nepf HM. 1999. Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res.. 35(2):479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell AR, Church M. 1979. Turbulent flow in a depth‐limited boundary layer. J Geophys Res. 84(C8):4816–4824.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit NE, Warfe DM, Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ, Davies PM, Douglas MM. 2013. Dynamics of in-stream wood and its importance as fish habitat in a large tropical floodplain river. River Res Appl. 29(7):864–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilotto F, Bertoncin A, Harvey GL, Wharton G, Pusch MT. 2014. Diversification of stream invertebrate communities by large wood. Freshw Biol. 59(12):2571–2583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga Raju KG, Rana OPS, Asawa GL, Pillai A. 1983. Rational assessment of blockage effect in channel flow past smooth circular cylinders. J Hydraul Res. 21(4):289–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi M, Darby SE. 2007. 9 Modelling river-bank-erosion processes and mass failure mechanisms: progress towards fully coupled simulations. Develop Earth Surf Process. 11:213–239.
   Google Scholar
• Robison EG, Beschta RL. 1990. Coarse woody debris and channel morphology interactions for undisturbed streams in southeast Alaska, USA. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 15(2):149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields FD, Gippel CJ. 1995. Prediction of effects of woody debris removal on flow resistance. J Hydraul Eng. 121(4):341–354.
   Google Scholar
• Tan L, Curran JC. 2012. Comparison of Turbulent Flows over Clusters of Varying Density. J Hydraul Eng. 138(12):1031–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W, Stremler MA. 2019. Critical spacing of stationary tandem circular cylinders at Re≈100. J Fluids and Struct. 89:49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdravkovich MM. 1977. Review of flow interference between two circular cylinders in various arrangements. J Fluids Eng. 99(4):618–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Rutherfurd ID, Ghisalberti M. 2019. Effect of instream logs on bank erosion potential: a flume study with a single log. J Ecohydraul. doi:10.1080/24705357.2019.1634499.
   Google Scholar