Development and evaluation of an empirical equation for the screening effect of bar racks

References

• Albayrak I, Maager F, Boes RM. 2019. An experimental investigation on fish guidance structures with horizontal bars. J Hydraul Res. 106(7):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong RA. 2014. When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 34(5):502–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger C. 2018. Rechenverluste und Auslegung von (elektrifizierten) Schrägrechen anhand ethohydraulischer Studien [Hydraulic losses and design of (electrified) inclined screens based on ethohydraulic studies] [dissertation]. Darmstadt: TU Darmstadt.
   Google Scholar
• Brown L, Haro A, Castro-Santos T. 2009. Three-dimensional movement of silver-phase American eels in the forebay of a small hydroelectric facility. Paper presented at: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 58; Bethesda, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Brown RS, Colotelo AH, Pflugrath BD, Boys CA, Baumgartner LJ, Deng ZD, Silva LGM, Brauner CJ, Mallen-Cooper M, Phonekhampeng O, et al. 2014. Understanding barotrauma in fish passing hydro structures. A global strategy for sustainable development of water resources. Fish. 39(3):108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calles, O, Olsson, IC, Comoglio, C, Kemp, PS, Blunden, LS, Schmitz M, & Greenberg LA. 2010. Size-dependent mortality of migratory silver eels at a hydropower plant and implications for escapement to the sea. Freshwater Biol. 55(10), 2167–2180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02459.x.
   Google Scholar
• Clavero M, Hermoso V. 2015. Historical data to plan the recovery of the European eel. J Appl Ecol. 52(4):960–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courret D, Larinier M. 2008. Guide pour la conception de prises d’eau « ichtyocompatibles » pour les petites centrales hydroelectriques [Guide for the design of "ichthyocompatible" water intakes for small hydroelectric power plants]. Rapport GHAAPPE RA.08.04.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker W. 2003. Status of the European eel stock and fisheries. In: Aida K, Tsukamoto K, Yamachi K, editors. Eel biology. Tokyo: Springer; p. 237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Carlson TJ, Ploskey GR, Richmond MC, Dauble DD. 2007. Evaluation of blade-strike models for estimating the biological performance of Kaplan turbines. Ecol Model. 208(2-4):165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebel G. 2016. Fischschutz und Fischabstieg an Wasserkraftanlagen; Handbuch Rechen- und Bypasssysteme [Fish protection and fish bypass at hydropower plants; manual for screen systems and bypass systems]. Halle (Saale): Büro für Gewässerökologie und Fischereibiologie. (Mitteilungen aus dem Büro für Gewässerökologie und Fischereibiologie; vol. 4).
   Google Scholar
• Fu T, Deng ZD, Duncan JP, Zhou D, Carlson TJ, Johnson GE, Hou H. 2016. Assessing hydraulic conditions through Francis turbines using an autonomous sensor device. Rev Fish Sci. 99:1244–1252.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes P, Larinier M. 2008. Dommages subis par les anguilles lors de leur passage au travers des turbines kaplan [Damage to eels during their passage through Kaplan turbines]. Rapport GHAPPE RA08.05.
   Google Scholar
• Gosset C, Travade F, Durif CMF, Rives J, Elie P. 2005. Tests of two types of bypass for downstream migration of eels at a small hydroelectric power plant. River Res. Applic. 21(10):1095–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan TW, Čada GF, Amaral SV. 2014. The status of environmentally enhanced hydropower turbines. Fish. 39(4):164–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby D, Gollock M. 2014. Anguilla anguilla: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014. [accessed 2020 January 26]. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/60344/45833138.
   Google Scholar
• Klopries E-M. 2018. Ethohydraulische und hydronumerische Untersuchungen an Rechen und Kaplanturbinen als Beitrag zur Reduktion der Aalschädigung an Laufwasserkraftanlagen [Ethohydraulic and hydronumerical investigations on screens and Kaplan turbines as a contribution to the reduction of eel damage at run-of-river power plants] [dissertation]. Herzogenrath: Shaker. (Mitteilungen des Lehrstuhls und Instituts für Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft der RWTH Aachen; vol. 173).
   Google Scholar
• Klopries E-M, Deng ZD, Lachmann TU, Schüttrumpf H, Trumbo BA. 2018a. Surface bypass as a means of protecting downstream-migrating fish. Lack of standardised evaluation criteria complicates evaluation of efficacy. Mar. Freshwater Res. 69(12):1882–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopries E-M, Böckmann I, Hoffmann A, Schüttrumpf H. 2018b. Einfluss geometrischer und hydraulischer Parameter auf das Verhalten abwandernder Fische an Wasserkraftanlagen [Influence of geometrical and hydraulic parameters on the behaviour of downstream migrating fish at hydropower plants. Bautechnik. 95(12):850–858. ],
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann B, Adam B, Engler O, Hecht V, Schneider K. 2016. Ethohydraulische Untersuchungen zur Verbesserung des Fischschutzes an Wasserkraftanlagen: Ergebnisse des F + E-Vorhabens (FKZ 3513 85 0300) des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz [Ethohydraulic investigations to improve fish protection at hydropower plants: Results of the R + D project (FKZ 3513 85 0300) of the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation]. Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Naturschutz und biologische Vielfalt; vol. 151).
   Google Scholar
• Landesfischereiverordnung (LfischVO). 2018. Verordnung zum Landesfischereigesetz (Landesfischereiverordnung - LFischVO).
   Google Scholar
• Lucas MC, Bubb DH, Jang M-H, Ha K, Masters J. 2009. Availability of and access to critical habitats in regulated rivers. Effects of low-head barriers on threatened lampreys. Freshw Biol. 54(3):621–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez JJ, Deng ZD, Titzler PS, Duncan JP, Lu J, Mueller RP, Tian C, Trumbo BA, Ahmann ML, Renholds JF. 2019. Hydraulic and biological characterization of a large Kaplan turbine. Renew Energy. 131:240–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister J, Fuchs H, Beck C, Albayrak I, Boes RM. 2020. Velocity fields at horizontal bar racks as fish guidance structures. Water. 12(1):280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Natur- und Verbraucherschutz des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (MUNLV). 2005. Handbuch Querbauwerke: Wasserwirtschaft [Manual for transverse structures: Water management]. Düsseldorf: MULNV.
   Google Scholar
• Neitzel DA, Dauble DD, Čada GF, Richmond MC, Guensch GR, Mueller RP, Abernethy CS, Amidan B. 2004. Survival estimates for juvenile fish subjected to a laboratory-generated shear environment. Trans Am Fish Soc. 133(2):447–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcote TG. 1998. Migratory behaviour of fish and its significance to movement through riverine fish passage facilities. In: Jungwirth M, Schmutz S, Weiss S, editors. Fish migration and fish bypasses. Oxford (England): Fishing News Books; p. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Nyqvist D, Nilsson PA, Alenäs I, Elghagen J, Hebrand M, Karlsson S, Kläppe S, Calles O. 2017. Upstream and downstream passage of migrating adult Atlantic salmon. Remedial measures improve passage performance at a hydropower dam. Ecol Eng. 102:331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyqvist D, Elghagen J, Heiss M, Calles O. 2018. An angled rack with a bypass and a nature-like fishway pass Atlantic salmon smolts downstream at a hydropower dam. Mar. Freshwater Res. 69(12):1894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor CM, Norris DR, Crossin GT, Cooke SJ. 2014. Biological carryover effects: Linking common concepts and mechanisms in ecology and evolution. Ecosph. 5(3):28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Økland F, Havn TB, Thorstad EB, Heermann L, Saether SA, Tambets M, Teichert MAK, Borcherding J. 2019. Mortality of downstream migrating European eel at power stations can be low when turbine mortality is eliminated by protection measures and safe bypass routes are available. Internat Rev Hydrobiol. 104(3-4):68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pracheil BM, DeRolph CR, Schramm MP, Bevelhimer MS. 2016. A fish-eye view of riverine hydropower systems. The current understanding of the biological response to turbine passage. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. 26(2):153–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynal S, Courret D, Chatellier L, Larinier M, David L. 2013. An experimental study on fish-friendly trashracks – Part 1. Inclined trashracks. J. of Hydraul. Res. 51(1):56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russon, I. J., Kemp, P. S. and Calles, O. 2010. Response of downstream migrating adult European eels (Anguilla anguilla) to bar racks under experimental conditions. Ecol Freshwater Fish, 19 (2), 197–205. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2009.00404.x.
   Google Scholar
• Silva AT, Katopodis C, Tachie MF, Santos JM, Ferreira MT. 2016. Downstream swimming behaviour of catadromous and potamodromous fish over spillways. River Res. Applic. 32(5):935–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AT, Lucas MC, Castro-Santos T, Katopodis C, Baumgartner LJ, Thiem JD, Aarestrup K, Pompeu PS, O’Brien GC, Braun DC, et al. 2018. The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice. Fish Fish. 19(2):340–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesch F-W, Rohlf N. 2003. Migration from continental waters to the spawning grounds. In: Aida K, Tsukamoto K, Yamachi K, editors. Eel biology. Tokyo: Springer; p. 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Tomanova S, Courret D, Alric A. 2017. Protecting fish from entering turbines: The efficiency of a low-sloping rack for downstream migration of Atlantic salmon smolts. La Houille Blanche. 364(1):11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travade F, Larinier M, Subra S, Gomes P, de Oliveira E. 2010. Behaviour and passage of European silver eels (Anguilla anguilla) at a small hydropower plant during their downstream migration. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst. 398(398):01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytell ED, Lauder GV. 2004. The hydrodynamics of eel swimming: I. Wake structure. J. Exp. Biol. 207(Pt 11):1825–1841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JG, Armstrong G, Katopodis C, Larinier M, Travade F. 2012. Thinking like a fish: A key ingredient for development of effective fish passage facilities at river obstructions. River Res. Applic. 28(4):407–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar