Hydraulic management of coastal freshwater marsh to conciliate local water needs and fish passage

References

• Amaral SD, Branco P, da Silva AT, Katopodis C, Viseu T, Ferreira MT, Pinheiro AN, Santos JM. 2016. Upstream passage of potadromous cyprinids over small weirs: the influence of key-hydraulic parameters. J Ecohydraul. 1(1–2):79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Baume J-P, Malaterre P-O, Belaud G, Le Guennec B. 2005. SIC: a 1D hydrodynamic model for river and irrigation canal modeling and regulation. Métodos Numéricos em Recursos Hidricos. 7:1–81.
   Google Scholar
• Belaud G, Cassan L, Baume J-P. 2009. Calculation of contraction coefficient under sluice gate and application to discharge measurement. J Hydraul Eng. 135(12):1086–1091.
   Google Scholar
• Belaud G, Cassan L, Baume J-P. 2012. Contraction and correction coefficient for Energy-Momentum balance under sluice gates. In: World Environmental and water Resources Congress 2012. Albuquerque, NM: ASCE; p. 2116–2127.
   Google Scholar
• Belaud G, Litrico X. 2008. Closed-form solution of the potential flow in a contracted flume. J Fluid Mech. 599:299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boys CA, Kroon F. j, Glasby TM, Wilkinson K. 2012. Improved fish and crustacean passage in tidal creeks following floodgate remediation. J Appl Ecol. 49(1):223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boys CA, Williams R. 2012. Succession of fish and crustacean assemblages following reinstatement of tidal flow in a temperate coastal wetland. Ecol Eng. 49:221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bult TP, Dekker W. 2007. Experimental field study on the migratory behaviour of glass eels (Anguilla anguilla) at the interface of fresh and salt water. ICES J Marine Sci. 64(7):1396–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doehring K, Young RG, Hay J, Quarterman AJ. 2011. Suitability of dual-frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) to monitor juvenile fish movement at floodgates. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res. 45(3):413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feunteun E. 2002. Management and restoration of European eel population (Anguilla anguilla). An impossible bargain. Ecol Eng. 18(5):575–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fovet O, Belaud G, Litrico X, Charpentier S, Bertrand C, Dollet P, Hugodot C. 2012. A model for fixed algae management in open channels using flushing flows. River Res Appl. 28(7):960–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin P, Bartels B. 2012. Restoring connectivity for migratory native fish in a New Zealand stream: effectiveness of retrofitting a pipe culvert. Aquatic Conserv . 22(4):489–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin P, Hodges M. 2015. Modified tide gate management for enhancing instream habitat for native fish upstream of the saline limit. Ecol Eng. 81:233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannico GR, Souder JA. 2005. Tide gates in the Pacific Northwest: operation, types, and environmental effects. Vol. 5. Corvallis, OR: Oregon Sea Grant, Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Katopodis C, Kells JA, Acharya M. 2001. Nature-like and conventional fishways: alternative concepts? Can Water Resour J. 26(2):211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Katopodis C, Williams JG. 2012. The development of fish passage research in a historical context. Ecol Eng. 48:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr JR, Karageorgopoulos P, Kemp P. 2015. Efficacy of a side-mounted vertically oriented bristle pass for improving upstream passage of European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) at an experimental crump weir. Ecol Eng. 85:121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larinier M. 2002. Fishway - general considerations. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic. 364(Suppl):21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Linton ED, Jonsson B, L G, N D. 2007. Effects of water temperature on the swimming and climbing behaviour of glass eels, Anguilla spp. Environ Biol Fish. 78(3):189–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas MC, Bubb DH, Jang MH, Ha K, Masters JEG. 2009. Availability of and access to critical habitats in regulated rivers: Effects of low-head barriers on threatened lampreys. Freshwater Biol. 54(3):621–634. (
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCleave JD. 1980. Swimming performance of Europen eel (Anguilla anguilla (L.)) elvers. J Fish Biol. 16(4):445–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouton AM, Huysecom S, Buysse D, Maarten S, Van den Neucker T, Coeck J. 2012. Optimisation of adjusted barrier management to improve glass eel migration at an estuarine barrier. J Coast Conserv. 18:111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouton A, Schneider M, Depestele J, Goethals P, De Pauw N. 2007. Fish habitat modelling as a tool for river management. Ecol Eng. 29(3):305–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouton AM, Stevens M, Van den Neucker T, Buysse D, Coeck J. 2011. Adjusted barrier management to improve glass eel migration at an estuarine barrier. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 439:213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold LR, Karageorgopoulos P, Kemp P. 2014. Corner and sloped culvert baffles improve the upstream passage of adult European eels (Anguilla anguilla). Ecol Eng. 73:752–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hanley J. 2011. Open rivers: barrier removal planning and the restoration of free-flowing rivers. J Environ Manage. 92(12):3112–3120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovidio M, Philippart JC. 2002. The impact of small physical obstacles on upstream movements of six species of fish. Hydrobiologia. 483(1/3):55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper AT, Wright RM, Kemp P. 2012. The influence of attraction flow on upstream passage of European eel (Anguilla anguilla) at intertidal barriers. Ecol Eng. 44:329–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcher J. 2002. Fishways for eels. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic. 364(Suppl):147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Rigaud C, Alric A, Robin FX, Courret D. 2014. Les civelles face à deux ouvrages latéraux de l´ estuaire de la Charente. Tests de modalités de gestion ou d aménagement visant à améliorer la franchissabilité de ces ouvrages. Bilan des suivis 2010–2013. Rapport du Pôle éhydraulique (Onema-Irstea-Imft); 92p.
   Google Scholar
• Roman CT, Garvine RW, Portnoy JW. 1995. Hydrologic modeling as a predictive basis for ecological restoration of salt marshes. Environ Manage. 19(4):559–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw E, Lange E, Shucksmith J, Lerner D. 2016. Importance of partial barriers and temporal variation in flow when modelling connectivity in fragmented river systems. Ecol Eng. 91:515–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travade F, Larinier M. 2002. Fish locks and fish lifts. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic. 364(Suppl):102–118.
   Google Scholar
• Vowles AS, Don AM, Karageorgopoulos P, Kemp PS. 2017. Passage of European eel and river lamprey at a model weir provisioned with studded tiles. J Ecohydraul. 2(2):88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlin B, Zimbelman DD. 2014. Canal automation for irrigation systems. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Watz J, Nilsson P, Degerman E, Tamario C, Calles O. 2019. Climbing the ladder: an evaluation of three different anguillid eel climbing substrata and placement of upstream passage solutions at migration barriers. Animal Conserv. 22(5):452–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright G, Wright R, Kemp P. 2014. Impact of tide gates on the migration of juvenile sea trout, Salmo trutta. Ecol Eng. 71:615–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C. 1999. Structure of flow in vertical slot fishway. J Hydraul Eng. 125(4):351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar