Design of a paired-weir system for experimental manipulation of environmental flows in streams

References

• Arthington AH. 2012. Environmental flows: saving rivers in the third millennium (Vol. 4). Berkely, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520273696.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Arthington AH, Bhaduri A, Bunn SE, Jackson SE, Tharme RE, Tickner D, Young B, Acreman M, Baker N, Capon S, et al. 2018. The Brisbane declaration and global action agenda on environmental flows (2018). Front Environ Sci. 6:45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs BJ. 1995. The contribution of flood disturbance, catchment geology and land use to the habitat template of periphyton in stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biol. 33(3):419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan BP, Auerbach DA, McManamay RA, Taylor JM, Flecker AS, Archibald JA, Fuka DR, Walter MT. 2017. Environmental flows in the context of unconventional natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Ecol Appl. 27(1):37–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauvy-Fraunié S, Andino P, Espinosa R, Calvez R, Jacobsen D, Dangles O. 2016. Ecological responses to experimental glacier-runoff reduction in alpine rivers. Nat Commun. 7:12025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewson ZS, James AB, Death RG. 2007a. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc. 26(3):401–415.
   Google Scholar
• Dewson ZS, James AB, Death RG. 2007b. Invertebrate community responses to experimentally reduced discharge in small streams of different water quality. J N Am Benthol Soc. 26(4):754–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbrecht V, Beermann AJ, Goessler G, Neumann J, Tollrian R, Wagner R, Wlecklik A, Piggott JJ, Matthaei CD, Leese F. 2016. Multiple‐stressor effects on stream invertebrates: a mesocosm experiment manipulating nutrients, fine sediment and flow velocity. Freshw Biol. 61(4):362–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francoeur SN, Biggs BJ. 2006. Short-term effects of elevated velocity and sediment abrasion on benthic algal communities. Hydrobiologia. 561(1):59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fröhlich J, Mellen CP, Rodi W, Temmerman L, Leschziner MA. 2005. Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. J Fluid Mech. 526:19–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore JA. 1977. Reservoir manipulations and benthic macroinvertebrates in a prairie river. Hydrobiologia. 55(2):113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González‐Zeas D, Rosero‐López D, Walter T, Flecker A, Lloret P, De Bièvre B, Condom T, Osorio R, Dangles O. 2019. Designing eco‐friendly water intake portfolios in a tropical Andean stream network. Water Resour Res. 55(8):6946–6967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEC. 2016. HEC-RAS River Analysis System Version 5.0 - User Manual, Hydrologic Engineering Center, CPD-68, 960. p.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson FM. 1966. Open channel flow, 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen D, Dangles O. 2017. Ecology of High-Altitude Waters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Konrad CP, Olden JD, Lytle DA, Melis TS, Schmidt JC, Bray EN, … & McMullen LE. 2011. Large-scale flow experiments for managing river systems. BioScience. 61(12):948–959.
   Google Scholar
• James ABW, Dewson ZS, Death RG. 2008. The effect of experimental flow reductions on macroinvertebrate drift in natural and streamside channels. River Res Applic. 24(1):22–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katopodis C. 2005. Developing a toolkit for fish passage, ecological flow management and fish habitat works. J Hydra Res. 43(5):451–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Horne AC, Nathan R, Szemis JM, Gibson L, Costa AM, Angus Webb J, Stewardson M. 2019. Examining trade-offs in piggybacking flow events while making environmental release decisions in a river system. J Water Resour Plann Manage. 145(6):04019019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Horne A, Stewardson MJ, Nathan R, Costa AM, Szemis JM, Webb JA. 2017. Challenges for determining frequency of high flow spells for varying thresholds in environmental flows programmes. J Ecohydra. 2(1):28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad CP, Olden JD, Lytle DA, Melis TS, Schmidt JC, Bray EN, Freeman MC, Gido KB, Hemphill NP, Kennard MJ, et al. 2011. Large-scale flow experiments for managing river systems. BioScience. 61(12):948–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamouroux N, Mérigoux S, Capra H, Dolédec S, Jowett IG, Statzner B. 2010. The generality of abundance‐environment relationships in microhabitats: a comment on Lancaster and Downes (2009). River Res Applic. 26(7):915–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster J. 2018. What is the right scale? Encouraging fruitful engagement for ecology with ecohydraulics. J Ecohydra. 3(2):63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster J, Downes BJ. 2010. Ecohydraulics needs to embrace ecology and sound science, and to avoid mathematical artefacts. River Res Applic. 26(7):921–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maazouzi C, Claret C, Dole-Olivier MJ, Marmonier P. 2013. Nutrient dynamics in riverbed sediments: effects of hydrological disturbances using experimental flow manipulations. J Soils Sediments. 13(1):207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez J, Reca J, Morillas MT, Lopez JG. 2005. Design and calibration of a compound sharp-crested weir. J Hydraul Eng. 131(2):112–116.
   Google Scholar
• Nestler JM, Stewardson MJ, Gilvear DJ, Webb JA, Smith DL. 2016. Ecohydraulics exemplifies the emerging “paradigm of the interdisciplines. J Ecohydra. 1(1-2):5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Poff NL, Voelz NJ, Ward JV, Lee RE. 1990. Algal colonization under four experimentally controlled current regimes in high mountain stream. J N Am Benthol Soc. 9(4):303–318.
   Google Scholar
• Poff N L, Zimmerman J K H. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol. 55(1):194–205.
   Google Scholar
• Rosero-López D, Walter MT, Flecker AS, Lloret P, De Bièvre B, González‐Zeas D, Calvez R, Dangles O. 2019. Streamlined eco‐engineering approach helps define environmental flows for tropical Andean headwaters. Freshw Biol. 64(7):1315–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosero‐López D, Knighton J, Lloret P, Encalada AC. 2020. Invertebrate response to impacts of water diversion and flow regulation in high‐altitude tropical streams. River Res Applic. 36(2):223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaton C, Souchon Y, Capra H, Gouraud V, Lascaux JM, Tissot L. 2008. Long‐term brown trout populations responses to flow manipulation. River Res Applic. 24(5):476–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J. 1981. Discharge characteristics of triangular-notch thin-plate weirs, Geological Survey Water Supply paper 1617 B, US Government Printing Office, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant DL. 1976. Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries. 1(4):6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tharme RE. 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Applic. 19(5-6):397–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar