Bootstrapping inference of average treatment effect in completely randomized experiments with high-dimensional covariates

References

• Neyman J. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. essay on principles (with discussion). section 9 (translated). reprinted ed. Stat Sci. 1923;5:465–472.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol. 1974;66:688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman DA. On regression adjustments to experimental data. Adv Appl Math. 2008b;40:180–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman DA. On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments. Ann Appl Stat. 2008a;2:176–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W. Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: reexamining freedman's critique. Ann Appl Stat. 2013;7:295–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloniarz A, Liu H, Zhang CH, et al. Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments. Proc National Acad Sci. 2016;113:7383–7390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta T, Pillai NS, Rubin DB. Causal inference from 2K factorial designs by using potential outcomes. J R Statist Soc: Ser B (Statistical Methodology). 2015;77:727–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa V, Dasgupta T, Rubin DB. A bayesian perspective on the analysis of unreplicated factorial experiments using potential outcomes. Technometrics. 2016;58(1):62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J. On randomization-based and regression-based inferences for 2k factorial designs. Stat Probab Lett. 2016;112:72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao A, Ding P, Dasgupta T. Randomization-based causal inference from split-plot designs. Ann Statist. 2018;46(5):1876–1903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Yang Y. Penalized regression adjusted causal effect estimates in high dimensional randomized experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.08732, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerl AE, Kennard RW. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics. 1970;12:55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Ann Statist. 2005;67:301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Ma S, Zhang C-H. Adaptive lasso for sparse high-dimensional regression models. Stat Sin. 2008;18:1603–1618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Imbens GW. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica. 2006;74:235–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist. 1979;7:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammen E. Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. Ann Statist. 1993;21:255–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel PJ, Freedman DA. Some asymptotic theory for the bootstrap. Ann Statist. 1981;9:1196–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel PJ, Freedman DA. Bootstrapping regression models with many parameters. In: Bickel P, Doksum K, and Hodges Jr. J. editors. Festschrift for Erich L. Lehmann. 1983. p. 28–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wu CFJ. Jackknife, bootstrap, and other resampling methods in regression analysis. Ann Statist. 1986;14:1261–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B, Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife and cross-validation. Am Stat. 1983;37:36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with her2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the noah trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel her2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempthorne O. The randomization theory of experimental inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:946–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Ding P. General forms of finite population central limit theorems with applications to causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;112:1759–1769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani RJ. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Statist Soc Ser B (Methodological). 1996;58:267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C-H, Zhang SS. Confidence intervals for low dimensional parameters in high dimensional linear models. J R Statist Soc Ser B (Methodological). 2014;76:217–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezeure R, Bühlmann P, Zhang C-H. High-dimensional simultaneous inference with the bootstrap. Test. 2017;26:685–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hájek J. Limiting distributions in simple random sampling from a finite population. Publ Math Inst Hungarian Acad Sci. 1960;5:361–74.
   Google Scholar
• Otsu T, Rai Y. Bootstrap inference of matching estimators for average treatment effects. J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112:1720–1732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin D. The bayesian bootstrap. Ann Statist. 1981;9:130–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue L, Li G, Lian H, et al. Regression adjustment for treatment effect with multicollinearity in high dimensions. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2018;134:17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Bono P, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:809–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar R, Domrachev E, Lash AE. Gene expression omnibus: ncbi gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:207–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat A, Bianchini G, Thomas M, et al. Research-based PAM 50 subtype predictor identifies higher responses and improved survival outcomes in HER 2-positive breast cancer in the NOAH study. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:511–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudoit S, Fridlyand J, Speed TP. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009;97:77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Fan J, Lv J. Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological). 2008;70:849–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar