Robust quasi-oracle semiparametric estimation of average causal effects

References

• Cain LE, Saag MS, Petersen M, et al. Using observational data to emulate a randomized trial of dynamic treatmentswitching strategies: an application to antiretroviral therapy. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:2038–2049.
   Google Scholar
• Moura LM, Westover MB, Kwasnik D, et al. Causal inference as an emerging statistical approach in neurology: an example for epilepsy in the elderly. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Z. Bounded, efficient and doubly robust estimation with inverse weighting. Biometrika. 2008;97:661–682.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal. Biometric. 1983;70:41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Z. Comment: understanding or, ps and dr. Stat Sci. 2007;22:560–568.
   Google Scholar
• Kang JD, Schafer JL. Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Stat Sci. 2007;22:523–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Causal inference for statistics social and biomedical science. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn J. On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica. 1998;66:315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services Outcomes Res Methodol. 2001;2:169–188.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiatis A, Davidian M. Comment: demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Stat Sci. 2007;22:569–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Tamer E. Irregular identification, support conditions, and inverse weight estimation. Econometrica. 2010;78:2021–2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump RK, Hotz VJ, Imbens GW, et al. Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika. 2009;96:187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen ML, Porter KE, Gruber S, et al. Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012;21:31–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM. Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting. J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113:390–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Ding P. Asymptotic inference of causal effects with observational studies trimmed by the estimated propensity scores. Biometrika. 2018;105:487–493.
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Wang J. Robust inference using inverse probability weighting. J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115:1851–1860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M. Simple least squares estimator for treatment effects using propensity score residuals. Biometrika. 2018;105:149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Wu P, Xu X, Tong X, et al. Semiparametric estimation for average causal effects using propensity score-based spline. J Stat Plan Inference. 2021;212:153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Fernandez-Val I, et al. Program evaluation with high-dimensional data. Econometrica. 2017;85:233–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie X, Wager S. Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.04912.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol. 1974;66:688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splawa-Neyman J, Dabrowska DM, Speed TP. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Stat Sci. 1990;5:465–472.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Inference and missing data. Biometrika. 1976;63:581–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumaker LL. Spline functions: basic theory. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, et al. Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. Econom J. 2018;21:1–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager S, Athey S. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113:1228–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S. Generalized random forests. Ann Stat. 2019;47:1148–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmert M, Lechner M. Nonparametric estimation of causal heterogeneity under high-dimensional confounding. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08779v1.
   Google Scholar
• Fan Q, Hsu YC, Lieli RP, et al. Estimation of conditional average treatment effects with high-dimensional data. J Bus Econ Statist. 2019;40(1):313–327.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy EH. Optimal doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous causal effects, 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14497v1.
   Google Scholar
• Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47:663–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins J, Rotnitzky A, Zhao L. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994;89:846–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang H, Robins JM. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics. 2005;61:962–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P, Yandell B. Semi-parametric generalized linear models. Vol. 32. New York: Springer; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman NE. Spline smoothing in a partly linear model. J R Statist Soc Ser B. 1986;48:244–248.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H. Covergence rates for parametric components in a partly linear model. Ann Statist. 1988;16:136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao K, Yu L, Gao Y, et al. Efficacy of zhengtian pill for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Eur J Integr Med. 2014;6:259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C. Asymptotic theory of nonlinear least squares estimation. Ann Statist. 1981;9:501–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber P. Robust regression: asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo. Ann Statist. 1973;1:799–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar