Flexible and robust procedure for subgroup inference

References

• Goldhrisch ASC, Collieoni M, Nasi ML, et al. Endocrine responsiveness and tailoring adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1054–1065.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullen KJ, Schumaker L, Nikitakis N, et al. Beta-Tubulin-II expression strongly predicts outcome in patients receiving induction chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck: a companion analysis of the TAX 324 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):622–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruberg SJ, Chen L, Wang Y. The mean doesn't mean as much any more: finding sub-groups for tailored therapeutics. Clinical Trials. 2010;7:574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, He X. Inference for subgroup analysis with a structured logistic-normal mixture model. J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110:303–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Huang J. A concave pairwise fusion approach to subgroup analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112:410–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan A, Song R, Lu W. Change-plane analysis for subgroup detection and sample size calculation. J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112:769–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egleston BL, Uzzo RG, Wong Y-N. Latent class survival models linked by principal stratification to investigate heterogeneous survival subgroups among individuals with early stage kidney. J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112:534–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan A, Chen X, Zhou Y, et al. Subgroup analysis with semiparametric models toward precision medicine. Stat Med. 2018;37:1830–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin D. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psycol. 1974;66(5):688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland PW. Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81(396):945–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl J, Glymour M, Jewell NP. Causal inference in statistics: a primer. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Robins J, Rotnitzky A, Zhao L. Estimation of regression coefficients when some of the regressors are not always observed. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994;89:846–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JM. Marginal structural models. Proceedings of the Section on Bayesian Statistical Science; Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association; 1997. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2004;23(19):2937–2960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang H, Robins JM. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics. 2005;61:962–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Stacked regression. Mach Learn. 1996;24: 49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opitz D, Maclin R. Popular ensemble methods: an empirical study. J Artif Intell Res. 1999;11:169–198.
   Google Scholar
• Rani P, Muneeswaran K. Emotion recognition based on facial components. Sadhana. 2018;43(3):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonab H, Can F. Less is more: a comprehensive framework for the number of components of ensemble classifiers. 2019. TNNLS. USA: IEEE; Available from arXiv:1709.02925.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan A, Yin A, Tan MT. Enhanced doubly robust procedure for causal inference. Stat Biosci. 2021; 13:454–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvitz DG, Thompson DJA. Generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47:663–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH, Tibshirani R. The monotone smoothing of scatterplots. Technometrics. 1984;26:243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM. Fitting monotonic polynomials to data. Comput Stat Quarterly. 1994;9:233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee H. Monotone nonparametric regression. Ann Stat. 1988;16:741–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay J. Monotone regression splines in action. Stat Sci. 1988;3:425–441.
   Google Scholar
• He X, Shi P. Monotone B-spline smoothing. J Am Stat Assoc. 1998;93:643–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly C, Rice J. Monotone smoothing with application to dose-response curves and the assessment of synergism. Biometrics. 1990;46:1071–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammen E. Estimating a smooth monotone regression function. Ann Stat. 1991;19:724–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle P, Morris S, Morton-Jones T. Case-control isotonic regression for investigation of elevation in risk around a risk source. Stat Med. 1999;18:1605–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Garcia TP, Ma Y, et al. Combining isotonic regression and EM algorithm to predict risk under monotonicity constraint. Ann Appl Stat. 2014;8:1182–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Sun Y, Yuan A, et al. Maximum likelihood estimation for shape-restricted single-index hazard models. 2021. In revision to a journal.
   Google Scholar
• Balabdaoui F, Groeneboom P, Hendrickx K. Score estimation in the monotone single index model. Scand J Stat. 2019;46:517–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster JC, Taylor JMC, Ruberg SJ. Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data. Stat Med. 2011;30:2867–2880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar