Top Google Scholar Citations to Kinesiology-Related Terms

References

• AKA. (2022). About AKA. American Kinesiology Association. https://www.americankinesiology.org/SubPages/Pages/About
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. A. W., Hardman, K., & Pan, D. W. (1996). Perceptions of department titles in the United States of America and the United Kingdom. Journal of the International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance, 33(1), 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS One, 4(6), e6022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2013). How good is research really? EMBO Reports, 14(3), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2013.9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations. Scientometrics, 98(1), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1161-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis, J. H. (2021). The National Academy of Kinesiology 2020 review and evaluation of doctoral programs in kinesiology. Kinesiology Review, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2020-0049
   Google Scholar
• Colakovac, I., & Barkovic, I. (2022). Fifty years of journal Kinesiology: Bibliometric characteristics of categorized papers. Kinesiology, 54(1), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.26582/k.54.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custonja, Z., Milanovic, D., & Sporis, G. (2009). Kinesiology in the names of higher education institutions in Europe and the United States of America. Kinesiology, 41(2), 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., & Cabezas-Clavjo, A. (2013). Ranking journals: Could Google Scholar metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago journal rank? Learned Publishing, 26(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1087/20130206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschet, M. (2010). The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Scholar. (n.d.). Google Scholar profiles. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html
   Google Scholar
• Greendorfer, S. L. (1987). Specialization, fragmentation, integration, discipline: What is the real issue? Quest, 39(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1987.10483856
   Google Scholar
• Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation— Review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., & Alakanagas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, S. (2011). Slowly but surely “kinesiology” gains foothold as department title. Kinesiology Today, 4(1), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, S. J. (2009). What’s in a name? Kinesiology Today, 2(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Janz, K. F., Cottle, S. L., Mahaffey, C. R., & Phillips, D. A. (1989). Current name trends in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 60(5), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1989.10604462
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2013). Impact and prestige of kinesiology-related journals. Comprehensive Psychology, 2(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2466/50.17.CP.2.13
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2014). Citation rates for highly-cited papers from different sub-disciplinary areas within kinesiology. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 25(2), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015a). Evidence of citation bias in kinesiology-related journals. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 26(1), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015b). Citation rate of highly-cited papers in 100 kinesiology-related journals. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.988336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015c). Influential kinesiology journals: The view from outside of the field. The Physical Educator, 72, 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2016). A classification of instructional programs (CIP) primer for kinesiology leaders. Kinesiology Review, 5(4), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2016-0018
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2019a). Kinesiology’s Tower of Babel: Advancing the field with consistent nomenclature. Quest, 71(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2018.1492427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2019b). Judicious use of bibliometrics to supplement peer evaluations of research in kinesiology. Kinesiology Review, 8(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2017-0046
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2022). What kinesiology knowledge is most visible to the academic world? Quest, 74(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2092880
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. V., & Brusseau, T. (Eds.). (2021). Introduction to kinesiology (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Scopus’s source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus the journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(11), 2365–2396. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahar, M. T., & Crenshaw, J. T. (2015). AKA salary survey 2015. American Kinesiology Association.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Martin, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus versus Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(13), 2105–2125. https://doi.org/10.1001/asi.20677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. R., & Thomas, J. R. (2010). American Kinesiology Association: A national effort to promote kinesiology. Quest, 62(1), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2010.10483635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAK. (n.d.). Kinesiology: The discipline and related professions. National Academy of Kinesiology. https://nationalacademyofkinesiology.org/SubPages/Pages/What%20is%20Kinesiology
   Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M. (1990). Kinesiology: The label for the study of physical activity in higher education. Quest, 42(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1990.10483999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M. (2021). Reflections on research in kinesiology. Kinesiology Review, 10(3), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2021-0031
   Google Scholar
• Owlia, P., Vasei, M., Goliaei, B., & Nassiri, I. (2011). Normalized impact factor (NIF): An adjusted method for calculating the citation rate of biomedical journals. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(2), 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, T. G. (2007). Kinesiology: Defining the academic core of our discipline. Quest, 59(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renson, R. (1989). From physical education to kinanthropology: A quest for academic and professional identity. Quest, 41(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1989.10483973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikli, R. (2006). Kinesiology—A “homeless” field: Addressing organization and leadership needs. Quest, 58(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira, C., Codina, L., Guerrero-Sole, F., & Lopezosa, C. (2019). Ranking by relevance and citation counts, a comparative study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS, and Scopus. Future Internet, 11(9), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11090202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, G. H. (2013). Resurrecting thirty years of historical insight about kinesiology: A supplement to “What is kinesiology? Historical and philosophical insights.” Quest, 65(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.773534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporis, G., Badric, M., Prskalo, I., & Bonacin, D. (2013). Kinesiology-systematic review. Sport Science, 6(1), 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Starosta, W. (2001). Human movement—Meaning, name, directions of development. Journal of Human Kinetics, 6(1), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Starosta, W., & Petryuski, W. (2007). Selected problems in international terminology of the human movement science. Kinesiology, 39(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R. E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199004)41:3<193::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twietmeyer, G. (2012). What is kinesiology: Historical and philosophical insights. Quest, 64(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.653268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. B., Lu, L., & Li, M. (2012). Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14(3), 033033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/03303
   Google Scholar