Affective Richness Vs Impoverishment In Development and Psychoanalysis: Some Thoughts on E. Virginia Demos’ “The Affect Theory of Silvan Tomkins for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy”

References

• Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (1988a). Mother–infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Frontiers in self psychology: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B. (2005). Mother–infant research informs mother–infant treatment. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 60(1), 7–46. doi:10.1080/00797308.2005.11800745
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2020). Infant research and adult treatment revisited: Co-creating self- and interactive regulation. Psychoanalytic Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pap0000305.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (1988b). The contribution of mother–infant mutual influence to the origins of self and object representations. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5(4), 305–337. (1994), Representation and internalization in infancy: Three principles of salience. Psychoanal. Psychol., 11: 127–165. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.5.4.305
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Lachmann, F. M., & Jaffe, J. (1997). Mother–infant interaction structures and pre-symbolic self and object representations. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 7(2), 133–182. doi:10.1080/10481889709539172
   Google Scholar
• Boston Change Process Study Group. (1998). Noninterpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The “something more” than interpretation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston Change Process Study Group. (2002). Explicating the implicit: The local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83(5), 1051–1062. doi:10.1516/B105-35WV-MM0Y-NTAD
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (2001). Pathways of emotional communication. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 21(1), 40–70. doi:10.1080/07351692109348923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demos, E. V. (1988). Affect and the development of the self: A new frontier. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Frontiers in self psychology: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 27–54). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demos, E. V. (ed.). (1995). Exploring affect: The selected writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demos, E. V., (ed.). (1998). Differentiating the repetition compulsion from trauma through the lens of Silvan Tomkins’s script theory: A response to Russell. In J. G. E. Teicholz & D. E. Kriegman (Eds.), Kriegman, trauma, repetition, & affect regulation (pp. 67–104). New York, NY: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demos, E. V. (ed.). (2019). The affect theory of Silvan Tomkins for psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semi-circle of mental health. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63, 395–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? ( (A. Goldberg & P. Stepansky, ed.)). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F. M., & Beebe, B. (1996a). The contribution of self- and mutual regulation to therapeutic action: A case illustration. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Basic ideas reconsidered: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 123–140). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F. M. (2000). Transforming aggression. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F. M., & Beebe, B. (1996b). Three principles of salience in the organization of the patient-analyst interaction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1037/h0079635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). Two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 19, 576–617.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. (1998). Trauma and the cognitive function of affects. In J. G. Teicholz & D. Kriegman (Eds.), Trauma, repetition, & affect regulation: The work of Paul Russell (pp. 23–48). New York, NY: The Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, L. (1995). Identity and the experience of specificity in a process of recognition. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 579–593.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, L. (2002). Thinking differently principles of process in living systems and the specificity of being known. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(1), 11–42. doi:10.1080/10481881209348652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, A. N. (2003a). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A. N. (2003b). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A. N. (2011). The right brain implicit self lies at the core of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21(1), 75–100. doi:10.1080/10481885.2011.545329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socarides, D., & Stolorow, R. (1984–1985). Affects and selfobjects. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 12/13, 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of being. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., Atwood, G., & Lachmann, F. M. (1980). Psychoanalysis of developmental arrests. Madison, CT: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G. (2000). The analyst’s empathy, subjectivity, and authenticity: Affect as the common denominator. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), How responsive should we be?: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 33–53). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G. (2009). A strange convergence: Postmodern theory, infant research and psychoanalysis. In R. Frie & D. Orange (Eds.), Beyond postmodernism: New dimensions in clinical theory and practice (pp. 69–91). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G. (2014). Treating trauma: The analyst’s own affect regulation and expression. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34(4), 364–379. doi:10.1080/07351690.2014.899790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. I: The positive affects. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. II: The negative affects. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. S. (1991). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. III: The negative affects: Anger and fear. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. S. (1992). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. IV: Cognition, duplication and transformation of information. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (2005). First things first: Infants make good use of the sympathetic rhythm of imitation, without reason or language. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 31(1), 91–113. doi:10.1080/00754170500079651
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2003). “Of course all relationships are unique”: How cocreative processes generate unique mother-infant and patient-therapist relationships and change other relationships. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23(3), 473–491. doi:10.1080/07351692309349044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1945). Primitive emotional development. In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis (pp. 145–146). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1963). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (Vol. 1965, pp. 179–192). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar