Relational Self Psychology: Could There Be Any Other Kind? A Discussion of Magid, Fosshage & Shane’s Paper, The Emerging Paradigm of Relational Self Psychology: A Historical Perspective

References

• Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (1988a). Mother-infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Frontiers in self psychology: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B. (2005). Mother-infant research informs mother-infant treatment. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 60(1), 7–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.2005.11800745
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (1988b). The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self- and object representations. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5(4), 305–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.5.4.305
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7, 459–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semi-circle of mental health. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 63, 395–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? ed., A. Goldberg & P. Stepansky. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F., & Beebe, B. (1996a). The contribution of self- and mutual regulation to therapeutic action: A case illustration. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Basic ideas reconsidered: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 123–140). Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F. (2000). Transforming aggression. London & Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F. (2008). Transforming narcissism. New York, NY, & London, ENGLAND: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F., & Beebe, B. (1996b). Three principles of salience in the organization of the patient-analyst interaction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 13(1), 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). Two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 19, 576–617.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, L. (1995). Identity and the experience of specificity in a process of recognition. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 579–593.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, L. (2002). Thinking differently Principles of process in living systems and the specificity of being known. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(1), 11–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881209348652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, A. (2003a). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A. (2003b). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. (2013). Intersubjective-systems theory: A Phenomenological-contextualist psychoanalytic perspective. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23(4), 383–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2013.810486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of being. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (1999). Kohut, Loewald & the postmoderns: A comparative study of self and relationship. Northvale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (2000). The analyst’s empathy, subjectivity, and authenticity: Affect as the common denominator. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), How responsive should we be?: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 33–53). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (2001). The many meanings of intersubjectivity and their implications for analyst self-expression and self-disclosure. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), The narcissistic patient revisited: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 9–42). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (2006). Qualities of engagement and the analyst’s theory. IJPSP, 1, 47–77.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (2009). A strange convergence: Postmodern theory, infant research, and psychoanalysis. In R. Frie & D. Orange (Eds.), Beyond postmodernism: New dimensions in clinical theory and practice (pp. 69–91). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (2014). Treating trauma: The analyst’s own affect regulation and expression. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34(4), 364–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2014.899790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (2015). Truth and consequences: What we lose and gain in psychoanalytic postmodernism. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35(6), 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2015.1055223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. (2016). The end of comparative psychoanalysis? Blurring the boundaries between contemporary theories. IJPSP, 11, 325–339.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthan, C. (2005). First things first: Infants make good use of the sympathetic rhythm of imitations, without reason or language. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 31(1), 91–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00754170500079651
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2003). Of course all relationships are unique: How co-creative processes generate unique mother-infant and patient-therapist relationships and change other relationships. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23(3), 473–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07351692309349044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobehavioral and socio-emotional development of infants and children. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar