Pilots’ Responses to Unexpected Events: Conceptual, Theoretical, Methodological, and Analytical Issues

References

• Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright, J. (2015, December). Slow-onset hypoxia. Business & Commercial Aviation, 63–66 https://code7700.com/pdfs/bca/bca_slow_onset_hypoxia_2015-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, B. P., & Iqbal, S. T. (2008). Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction(TOCHI), 14(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314683.1314689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, C. E. (2018). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Carayon, P., Hancock, P. A., Leveson, N., Noy, I., Sznalwar, & van Hootegem, G. (2015). Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety: Developing the conceptual framework. Ergonomics, 58(4), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. S. (2015). Knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns: Time and uncertainty in naturalistic decision making. In K. Mosier & U. Fischer (Eds.), Informed by knowledge management: Expert performance in complex situations (pp. 26). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Visser, E. J., Dorfman, A., Chartrand, D., Lamon, J., Freedy, E., & Weltman, G. (2016). Building resilience with the Stress Resilience Training System: Design validation and applications. Work, 54(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162295
   Google Scholar
• De Winter, J. C. F., Eisma, Y. B., Cabrall, C. D. D., Hancock, P. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2019). Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0527-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, S. W., & Lundstrom, J. (2006). From threat and error management (TEM) to resilience. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 6(3), 261–274 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.5844&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, S. W., & Pruchnicki, S. (2013). Drifting into failure: Theorizing the dynamics of disaster incubation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 15(6), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2013.856495
   Google Scholar
• Dismukes, K., Young, G., & Sumwalt, S. (1998). Cockpit interruptions and distractions: Effective management requires a careful balancing act. (Document ID 2002006298. CRM Industry Conference. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Dismukes, R. K., Goldsmith, T. E., & Kochan, J. A. (2015). Effects of acute stress on aircrew performance: Literature review and analysis of operational aspects. (NASA Technical Memorandum TM-2015-218930). NASA Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Duenas-Osorio, L., & Vemuru, S. M. (2009). Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems. Structural Safety, 31(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faerevaag, C. L., Rivera, J. A., Jimenez, C. A., & Jentsch, F. (2018). A review of current CRM training and evaluation techniques implemented by U.S. Air Carriers. (Report number FAA-CRA 17G-001).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration. (2004). Subject: Crew resource management training. (Advisory Circular 120-51E). https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-71B.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration. (2015). Stall Prevention and Recovery Training. (Advisory Circular 120-109A). https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/1028646
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration. (2017). Standard operating procedures and pilot monitoring duties for flight deck crewmembers. (Advisory Circular Nr. 120-71B). https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentid/1030486
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2016). Pilot’s handbook of aeronautical knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25). https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. E. (2005). Theories of information behavior. Information Today, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, E. L., Tyrrell, R. A., & Owens, D. A. (2020). Perception response time and its misapplication: An historical and forensic perspective. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 21(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1736204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K., Kilner, J., & Harrison, L. (2006). A free energy principle for the brain. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 100(1–3), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1972.10519717
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. L., & Luo, S. (2011). The personal expansion questionnaire: Measuring one’s tendency to expand through novelty and augmentation. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greatrix, D. R. (2012). Powered flight. Springer Verlag London Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (1986). The effect of skill on performance under an environmental stressor. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 57(1), 59–64 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-13191-001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31(5), 519–537 doi:10.1177/001872088903100503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (1989). The effect of performance failure and task demand on the perception of mental workload. Applied Ergonomics, 20(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(89)90077-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (1996). Effect of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload. Ergonomics, 39(9), 1146–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., & Desmond, P. A. (Eds.). (2001). Stress, workload and fatigue. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2005). Time and the privileged observer. Kronoscope, 5(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852405774858744
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., & Weaver, J. L. (2005). On time distortions under stress. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 6(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220512331325747
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Hancock, G. M., & Warm, J. S. (2009). Individuation: The N=1 revolution. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 10(5), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220903106387
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Olsen, K., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors impacting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2013). In search of vigilance: The problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. American Psychologist, 68(2), 97–109 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2014). Automation: How much is too much? Ergonomics, 57(3), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.816375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Sawyer, B. D., & Stafford, S. (2015). The effects of display size on performance. Ergonomics, 58(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.973914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Volante, W., & Szalma, J. L. (2016). Defeating the vigilance decrement. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2–3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2016.1178191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2017a). On the nature of vigilance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816655240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2017b). Whither workload? Mapping a path for its future development. In L. Longo & M. Chiara Leva (Eds.), Human mental workload: Models and applications (pp. 3–17). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2017c). Imposing limits on autonomous systems. Ergonomics, 60(2), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1190035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2019). Zero-time theory. In C. Montemayor & R. Daniel (Eds.), Time and urgency (pp. 68–90). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., & Matthews, G. (2019). Workload and performance: Associations, insensitivities, and dissociations. Human Factors, 61(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818809590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Nourbakhsh, I., & Stewart, J. (2019). On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7684–7691. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805770115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. M., Longo, L., Young, M., & Hancock, P. A. (2021). Mental workload. In W. Karwowski & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 203–226). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2021a). Months of monotony–moments of mayhem: Planning for the human role in a transitioning world of work. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1753260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2021b). Avoiding adverse autonomous agent’s actions. Human-Computer Interaction 37 (3) 211–236, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1970556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. (2022). Reacting and responding to rare, uncertain, and unprecedented events. Ergonomics. Revised Manuscript in Submission.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., & Cruit, J. (2022). Resilience in humans and systems. Manuscript Submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Lee, J. D., & Senders, J. W. (2022). Attribution error in humans and machines. Human Factors doi:10.1177/00187208211036323. in press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M., Wiebe, E. N., Grafsgaard, J. F., Boyer, K. E., & Lester, J. C. (2013). Physiological responses to events during training use of skin conductance to inform future adaptive learning systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57, 2101–2105
   Google Scholar
• Hassall, M. E., Sanderson, P. M., & Cameron, I. T. (2014). The development and testing of SAfER: A resilience-based human factors method. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343414527287
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, G. R. J. (Ed.). (1983). Stress and fatigue in human performance. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. R., Deal, S. V., Potter, S., & Roth, E. M. (2010). The practitioner’s cycles, Part 2: Solving envisioned world problems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(3), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2010.89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. R., & Hancock, P. A. (2017). Measuring resilience. Human Factors, 59(4), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816686248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E. (2014). Is safety a subject for science? Safety Science, 67, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Authority (ICAO). (2018). Doc 9859 Safety management manual (4th Ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. J., Sawyer, B. D., van Egmond, T., de Ridder, H., & Hancock, P. A. (2016). Hysteresis in mental workload and task performance: The influence of demand transitions and task prioritization. Human Factors, 58(8), 1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816669271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. E., Moen, J. B., & Thompson, W. B. (1988). Garden path errors in diagnostic reasoning Bolc, L, Coombs, M. J. In Expert system applications (pp. 395–427). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. D., Cruit, J., Endsley, M., Beers, S. M., Sawyer, B. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2021). Virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 63(4), 706–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820904229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney, L., & O’Hare, D. (2019). Responding to an unexpected in-flight event: Physiological arousal, information processing, and performance. Human Factors, 62(5), 737–750 doi:10.1177/0018720819854830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochan, J. (2005). The role of domain expertise and judgment in dealing with unexpected events. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Central Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Kochan, J. A., Breiter, E. G., & Jentsch, F. (2005). Surprise and unexpectedness in flying: Factors and features. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Oklahoma City: Wright State University. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/isap_2005/59
   Google Scholar
• Landman, A., Groen, E. L., van Paassen, M. M., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2017). Dealing with unexpected events on the flight deck: A conceptual model of startle and Surprise. Human Factors, 59(8), 1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817723428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, A., van Oorschot, P., van Paassen, M. M., Groen, E. L., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2018). Training pilots for unexpected events: A simulator study on the advantage of unpredictable and variable scenarios. Human Factors, 60(6), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818779928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, A., van Middelaar, S. H., Groen, E. L., van Paassen, M. M., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2020). The effectiveness of a mnemonic-type startle and Surprise management procedure for pilots. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 30(3–4), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2020.1763798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langewieche, W. (1944). Stick and rudder. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, D., Aon, M. A., & Cortassa, S. (2001). Why homeodynamics, not homeostasis? The Scientific World Journal, 1, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.20
   Google Scholar
• Loukopoulos, L. D., Dismukes, R. K., & Barshi, I. (2001, March). Cockpit interruptions and distractions: A line observation study. In Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on aviation psychology (pp. 1–6). Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, J., & Kluger, J. (1994). Lost moon: The perilous voyage of Apollo 13. HMH Books.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, W. L., Murray, P. S., Bates, P. R., & Lee, P. S. (2015). Fear-potentiated startle: A review from an aviation perspective. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 25(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2015.1128293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, G. (2002). Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210124120
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., Hancock, P. A., Lin, J., Panganiban, A., Reinerman-Jones, L., Szalma, J. L., & Wohleber, R. (2021). Evolution and revolution: Personality research for the coming world of robots, artificial intelligence, and autonomous systems. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 109969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, V., Adleman, N. E., White, C. D., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2001). Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Human Brain Mapping, 12(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200103)12:3<131::AID-HBM1010>3.0.CO;2-C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshkati, N., & Khashe, Y. (2015). Operators’ improvisation in complex technological systems: Successfully tackling ambiguity, enhancing resiliency and the last resort to averting disaster. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, W., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of Surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024422330338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. F., & Hancock, P. A. (2011). The effect of prior task loading on mental workload: An example of hysteresis in driving. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810393505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board. (1973). Aircraft Accident Report Eastern Air Lines, Inc. L-1011 N310EA Miami, Florida December 29, 1972 (Report Number NTSB-AAR-73-14). https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7314.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board. (2019). Aviation accident final report Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 Boeing 737-7H4, N772SW, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 17, 2018. (Aviation Accident Report NTSB/AAR-19/03 PB2019-101439).
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y., Parker, D., & Grante, C. (2004). Automating the failure modes and effects analysis of safety critical systems. Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering. (pp. 310–311). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Pruchnicki, S., Key, K., & Rao, A. (2019). Problem solving/decision making and procedures for unexpected events: A literature review. Office of Aerospace Medicine, DOT/FAA/AM-20/01, 1–43 https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57074
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, A., Woltjer, R., & Field, J. (2016). Sensemaking following Surprise in the cockpit—a re- framing problem. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0390-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, J. (2000). Safety paradoxes and safety culture. Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1076/1566-0974(200003)7:1;1-V;FT003
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, J., Talone, A. B., Boesser, C. T., Jentsch, F., & Yeh, M. (2014). Startle and Surprise on the flight deck: Similarities, differences, and prevalence. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58 (1), 1047–1051. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581219
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L. (2002). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebok, A., & Wickens, C. D. (2017). Implementing lumberjacks and black swans into model-based tools to support human–automation interaction. Human Factors, 59(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816665201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Hancock, P. A. (1995). Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors, 37(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in Ill-Structured domains Constructivism in education. 10257452. Corpus ID. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052600-11
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Salas, E., & Hancock, P. A. (2017). State of the science: Situation awareness in individuals, teams, and systems. Ergonomics, 60(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1278796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, D. B., Casati, B., Ferro, C. A. T., & Wilson, C. A. (2008). The extreme dependency score: A non-vanishing measure for forecasts of rare events. Meteorological Applications, 15(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Hancock, P. A. (1996). Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications (pp. 183–200). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2011). Organizing for transient reliability: The production of dynamic non‐events. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Hooey, B. L., Gore, B. F., Sebok, A., & Koenicke, C. S. (2009). Identifying black swans in NextGen: Predicting human performance in off-nominal conditions. Human Factors, 51(5), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809349709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, D. J., Chancey, E. T., Politowicz, M. S., & Ballin, M. G. (2020). Achieving resilient in-flight performance for advanced air mobility through simplified vehicle operations. AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, 2915 https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2915.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. D. (2015). Four concepts for resilience and their Implications for systems safety in the face of complexity. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 141, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. D. (2019). Essentials of resilience, revisited. In M. Ruth & S. Goessling-Reisemann (Eds.), Handbook on resilience of socio-technical systems (pp. 52–65). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015). State of the science: Mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 58(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.956151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar