Mega infrastructure projects as agents of change: new perspectives on ‘the global infrastructure gap’

References

• Adams, J. 1981. Transport Planning: Vision and Practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, R. J. 2011. Planning Major Projects. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuler, A., and D. Luberoff. 2003. Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• ADB. 2014. Toward a Sustainability Appraisal Framework for Transport, ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
   Google Scholar
• Anyinam, C. 1994. “Spatial Implications of Structural Adjustment Programmes in Ghana.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 85 (5): 446–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, G., E. Bressanelli, and S. Gianfreda. 2020. “Taking Back Control: Brexit, Sovereignism and Populism in Western Europe.” European Politics and Society 21 (2): 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Baghai, M., S. Coley, and D. White. 1999. The Alchemy of Growth: Practical Insights for Building the Enduring Enterprise. London: TEXERE Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E., B. Milward, G. Mohan and A. Zack-Williams. 2000. Structural Adjustment Theory, Practice and Impacts. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capka, R. 2004. Megaproject: They are a Different Breed. Public Roads, Federal Highway Administration. Washington D.C.: US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (EC). 2005. “Green Paper on an European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection.” Brussels, 17 November https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4e3f9be0-ce1c-4f5c-9fdc-07bdd441fb88/language-en
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B., and M. Kelly. 1999. “The Socioeconomic Impacts of Structural Adjustment.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (3): 533–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., and N. Low. 2012. Institutional Barriers to Sustainable Transport. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriou, H. T. 2005. “Globalization, Mega Transport Projects and the Making of Mega Places.” Presentation to 2005 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Paper 05-2784, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriou, H. T. 2009. “Globalization, Mega Transport Projects and Private Finance.” Volvo Research & Education Foundations (VREF) Future of Urban Transport Conference Paper, Gothenburg, April. www.omegacentre.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/2009-Goteborg-Sweden.-Globalization-Mega-Transport-Projects-and-Private-Finance.-Emerging-challenges-for-21st-Century.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriou, H. T., E. J. Ward, and P. G. Wright. 2013. “Mega Transport projects - Beyond the Iron Triangle: Findings from the OMEGA Research Programme.” Progress in Planning 86: 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. 2004. “Evaluating the Operation of PFI in Roads and Hospitals.” Certified Accountants Educational Trust Research Report, No. 84.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors. 2018. Special Report: Public Private Partnerships in the EU: Widespread shortcomings and limited benefits. ECA, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2013. TEN-T Large Projects: Investments and Costs. Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Transport and Tourism, Brussels, January.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., N. Bruzelius, and W. Rothengatter. 2003. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. 2008. Hot, Flat and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution and How it can Renew America. New York: Picador/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, Jessop. 1969. Local Government and Strategic Choice. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, I., S. V. Lall, and M. Lebrand. 2019. Winners and Losers Along China’s Belt and Road. Future Development, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., 21 June. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2019/06/21/winners-and-losers-along-chinas-belt-and-road/
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little, Brown Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., T. Ryley, and R. Dingwall. 2014. “Beyond ‘Predict and Provide’: UK Transport: The Growth Paradigm and Climate Change.” Transport Policy 32: 139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2010. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and G. Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, J., H. Corbett, and M. Leach. 2019. “Introduction: The Belt and Road Initiative and the Sustainable Development Goals: Opportunities and Challenges.” Institute of Development Studies Bulletin 50: 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., S. Marvin and T. Moss. 2001. Infrastructure in Transition. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. J. 1980. Great Planning Disasters. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Helby Petersen, O. 2019. “Evaluating the Costs, Quality, and Value for Money of Infrastructure in Public-Private Partnerships: A Systematic Literature Review.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 90 (2): 227–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmati, M., and F. Rogers. 2015. Beyond Sweet-Talk and Blanket Criticism – Towards Successful Implementation. London: CatalySD Sustainability | Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. 1937. “Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation.” Econometrica 5 (2): 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 1967. Development Projects Observed. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hoare, A., L. Hong, and J. Hein. 2018. The Role of Investors in Promoting Sustainable Infrastructure under the Belt and Road Initiative. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. and C. Greve. (Eds.). 2019. The Challenge of Public Private Partnerships: Learning Lessons from International Experience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2019. Climate Change and Land: Summary for Policymakers. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, N. 2009. Stakeholder Engagement: A Road Map to Meaningful Engagement. Bedford: Doughty Centre, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University.
   Google Scholar
• Judt, T. 2010. Ill Fares the Land. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamiya, M., and W. Ma Wenyan. 2019. Sovereign Investment Funds could be the Answer to the SDGs. World Economic Forum, Geneva, 4 December. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/sovereign-wealth-funds-sdgs
   Google Scholar
• Kessides, C. 1993. “The Contribution of Infrastructure to Economic Development: A Review of Experience and Policy Implications.” World Bank Discussion Paper No. WDP 213, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leigland, J. 2018. “Public-Private Partnerships in Developing Countries: The Emerging Evidence-Based Critique.” The World Bank Research Observer 33 (1): 103–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, G., G. Mariani, T. Sainati, and M. Greco. 2017. “Corruption in Public Projects and Megaprojects: There is an Elephant in the Room.” International Journal of Project Management 35 (3): 252–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50 (4): 370–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. 2013. Infrastructure Productivity: How to save US$1 Trillion a Year in Infrastructure Productivity. New York: MGI and McKinsey Infrastructure Practice.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. 2016. Bridging Global Infrastructure Gaps. New York: MGI and McKinsey Infrastructure Practice.
   Google Scholar
• MERICS. 2018. Mapping the Belt and Road Initiative: This is Where We Stand. Mercator Institute for China Studies, Berlin. https://www.merics.org/en/bri-tracker/mapping-the-belt-and-road-initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, A., and D. Valerie. 2019. How Accountants Can Bridge the Global Infrastructure Gap: Improving Outcomes Across the Entire Project Life Cycle. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) and Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada), London and Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Mold, A. 2012. “Will It All End in Tears? Infrastructure Spending and African Development in Historical Perspective.” Journal of International Development 24 (2): 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, A. H. B. 2009. “Recasting the Sovereign Wealth Fund Debate: trust, Legitimacy, and Governance.” New Political Economy 14 (4): 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, K., and R. M. Leichenko. 2003. “Winners and Losers in the Context of Global Change.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1): 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Costs of Inaction and Resource scarcity: Consequences for Long-term Economic growth, Policy Perspectives, The CIRCLE Project, The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OMEGA Centre. 2010. Study of Incorporation of Social and Environmental Dimensions of Sustainable Development in the Appraisal of Major Infrastructure Projects, Report prepared for UK Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE), UK Actuary Profession (AP), OMEGA Centre, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• OMEGA Centre. 2011. Mega Projects and Mega Risks: Lessons for Decision-makers through a Comparative Analysis of Selected Large-scale Transport Infrastructure Projects in Europe, USA and Asia Pacific, Six Volumes of Final Report of a five-year international research programme, OMEGA Centre, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• OMEGA Centre. 2012. Mega Projects: Executive Summary – Lessons for Decision-makers: An Analysis of Selected International Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Projects, OMEGA Centre, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• OMEGA Centre. 2015. Development of MCA Methodology for European Investment Bank. Multi-Criteria Analysis Methodology for Project Appraisal, Report prepared for Regional and Urban Development Division of European Investment Bank, OMEGA Centre, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou, V. 2019. “World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, Davos, Switzerland: Report on Infrastructure Sessions.” Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development 1 (1):104–107.
   Google Scholar
• Picketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. 2011. The Rise and Fall of Export-Led Growth. Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No. 675, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York, July.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1990. “The Competitive Advantage of Nations.” Harvard Business Review, Boston, March-April.
   Google Scholar
• Preqin Sovereign Wealth Fund Review. 2016. Real Assets Spotlight, May. Accessed February 2020. https://docs.preqin.com/newsletters/ra/Preqin-RASL-May-16-Feature-Article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, C. 1995. “International Structural Adjustment and Its Sectoral and Spatial Impacts.” Urban Studies 32 (2): 261–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. 1955. Economics, 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, S., and J. Kanai. 2019. “Getting the Territory Right: infrastructure-Led Development and the Re-Emergence of Spatial Planning Strategies.” Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. 2013. “Structural Adjustment: A Major Cause of Poverty.” Global Issues (online journal), 24 March.
   Google Scholar
• Snowy Mountain Engineering Company. 2001. The Management of Megaprojects in International Development. Snowy Mountain, SMEC Holdings Ltd., Cooma, New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Sol, X. 2019. “Rebuilding the World: The Hubris Behind the Global Infrastructure Agenda.” Open Democracy, London, 11 April. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/rebuilding-world-hubris-behind-global-infrastructure-agenda/
   Google Scholar
• The Ecological Sequestration Trust. 2016. Roadmap 2030: Financing and Implementing the Global Goals in Human Settlements and City-Regions by 2030. The Ecological Sequestration Trust, London. www.worldurbancampaign.org/ecological-sequestration-trust-story-roadmap-2030
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2009. “Economics: What went wrong?” Leaders Section, The Economist, London, July 18th–26th.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2019. “The Climate Issue.” The Economist, London, September 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2020a. “The World Economy: Goodbye Globalization.” Leaders Section, The Economist, London, May 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2020b. “Climate Change: Seize the moment.” Leaders Section, The Economist, London, May 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tonchev, P. 2019. Chinese Investment in Greek, Sri Lankan Sea Ports: Analogies and Lessons Learned, China Observers in Central and Eastern Europe (CHOICE), 23 July. https://chinaobservers.eu/chinese-investment-in-greek-sri-lankan-sea-ports-analogies-and-lessons-learned/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. The UN Sustainable Development Goals Report, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. 2012. 21 Issues of 21st Century: UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2019. The 2019 Sustainable Development Goals Report. Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Putten, F. P. 2016. “Infrastructure and Geopolitics: China’s Emerging Presence in the Eastern Mediterranean.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18 (4): 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waage, J., C. Yap, S. Bell, C. Levy, G. Mace, T. Pegram, E. Unterhalter, N. Dasandi, D. Hudson, R. Kock, S. Mayhew, et al. 2015. “Governing the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Interactions, Infrastructures and Institutions.” The Lancet. Global Health 3 (5): e251–e252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, E. J., H. T. Dimitriou, and M. Dean. 2016. “Theory and Background of Multi-Criteria Analysis: Toward a Policy-Led Approach for Mega Transport Project Infrastructure Appraisal’ and ‘Theory and Background of Multi-Criteria Analysis: Toward a Policy-Led Approach for Mega Transport Project Infrastructure Appraisal.” Research in Transportation Economics 58: 21–45. VolOctober
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, E. J., H. T. Dimitriou, B. G. Field, and M. Dean. 2019. “The Planning and Appraisal of Mega Transport Infrastructure Projects Delivered by Public–Private Partnerships: The Case for the Use of Policy-Led Multi-Criteria Analysis.” Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal 11 (1): 1992–2008.
   Google Scholar
• Weiß, J., A. Sachs, and H. Weinelt. 2018. Globalization Report: Who Benefits Most from Globalization? Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh.
   Google Scholar
• WEF. 2014. Strategic Infrastructure Steps to Operate and Maintain Infrastructure Efficiently and Effectively, World Economic Forum prepared in collaboration with The Boston Consulting Group, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• WEF. 2019. The Global Risks Report 2019, published in partnership with Marsh & McLennan Companies and Zurich Insurance Group, World Economic Forum, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• WEF. 2020. The Global Risks Report 2020, published in partnership with Marsh & McLennan Companies and Zurich Insurance Group, World Economic Forum, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Brundtland Report, WCED, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank 2010. “Export Performance and Trade Facilitation Reform: Hard and Soft Infrastructure.” By Alberto Portugal-Perez and John S. Wilson, Policy Research Working Paper 5261, World Bank, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors. Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yescombe, E., and E. Farquharson. 2018. Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure (2nd Edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zelner, B. A., and W. J. Henisz. 2000. Politics and Infrastructure Investment, 7 September. Accessed March 29, 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=236940 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.236940
   Google Scholar
• Zepeda, E, et al. 2009. “Export-Led Growth as a Tool for Financing Development: Is the Financial Crisis Revealing its Limits?” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C., 29 June.
   Google Scholar