The Impacts of Human-Cobot Collaboration on Perceived Cognitive Load and Usability during an Industrial Task: An Exploratory Experiment

References

• Bevan, N. (2009). What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods. Proceedings of the Workshop UXEM, 9(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, N., Carter, J., & Harker, S. (2015). ISO 9241-11 revised: What have we learnt about usability since 1998?. In Human–Computer Interaction: Design and Evaluation (M. Kurosu, Ed.). (pp. 143–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_13
   Google Scholar
• Cain, B. (2007). A Review of the Mental Workload Literature. Defense Research and Development Toronto. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Review-of-the-Mental-Workload-Literature-Cain/a41e553eea5621e8b20b4ad6fe9ab5bcab02a284
   Google Scholar
• Cegarra, J., & Morgado, N. (2009). Étude des propriétés de la version francophone du NASA-TLX. COOP’2000. https://docplayer.fr/21755956-Etude-des-proprietes-de-la-version-francophone-du-nasa-tlx.html
   Google Scholar
• Chacón, A., Ponsa, P., & Angulo, C. (2020). On cognitive assistant robots for reducing variability in industrial human-robot activities. Applied Sciences, 10(15), 5137. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155137
   Google Scholar
• Chaniaud, N., Métayer, N., Megalakaki, O., & Loup-Escande, E. (2020). Effect of prior health knowledge on the usability of two home medical devices: Usability study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(9), e17983. https://doi.org/10.2196/17983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgate, J. E., Wannasuphoprasit, W., & Peshkin, M. A. (1996). Cobots: Proceedings of the 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 433–439. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030402971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey, S., & Rana, A. (2010). Analytical roadmap to usability definitions and decompositions. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(9), 4723–4729.
   Google Scholar
• El Makrini, I., Elprama, S. A., Van den Bergh, J., Vanderborght, B., Knevels, A.-J., Jewell, C. I. C., Stals, F., De Coppel, G., Ravyse, I., Potargent, J., Berte, J., Diericx, B., Waegeman, T., & Jacobs, A. (2018). Working with walt: How a cobot was developed and inserted on an auto assembly line. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2018.2815947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager, P., Calzavara, M., & Sgarbossa, F. (2019). Kit preparation with cobot-supported sorting in mixed model assembly. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1878–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.476
   Google Scholar
• Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A., Panagou, S., & Sabattini, L. (2020). Cognitive human modeling in collaborative robotics. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.082
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati, Eds.) (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). Human Mental Workload, North Holland, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l’Interaction HommeMachine, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1512714.1512717
   Google Scholar
• INRS. (2018). Dossier Robots collaboratifs. www.inrs.fr/risques/robots-collaboratifs.html
   Google Scholar
• Kildal, J., Martín, M., Ipiña, I., & Maurtua, I. (2019). Empowering assembly workers with cognitive disabilities by working with collaborative robots: A study to capture design requirements. Procedia CIRP, 81, 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.202
   Google Scholar
• Kildal, J., Tellaeche, A., Fernández, I., & Maurtua, I. (2018). Potential users’ key concerns and expectations for the adoption of cobots. Procedia CIRP, 72, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.104
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F. (1991). Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. Multiple-task performance (1), 279–328.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. pp. 362. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauliková, A., Gyurák Babeľová, Z., & Ubárová, M. (2021). Analysis of the impact of human–cobot collaborative manufacturing implementation on the occupational health and safety and the quality requirements. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, C. C. (2019). Invisible women: Data bias in a world designed for men. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• de Perre, G. V., Makrini, I. E., Acker, B. B. V., Saldien, J., Vergara, C., Pintelon, L., Chemweno, P., Weuts, R., Moons, K., Dewil, R., Cattrysse, D., Burggraeve, S., Mateus, J. C., Decré, W., Aertbeliën, E., & Vanderborght, B. (2018). Improving productivity and worker conditions in assembly: Part 1—A collaborative architecture and task allocation. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2018: Towards a Robotic Society. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/improving-productivity-and-worker-conditions-in-assembly-part-1-a
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2019). Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature, 575(7781), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salunkhe, O., Stensöta, O., Åkerman, M., Berglund, Å. F., & Alveflo, P.-A. (2019). Assembly 4.0: Wheel hub nut assembly using a cobot. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1632–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.434
   Google Scholar
• Swamidass, P. M. (Ed.). (2000). Manufacturing in variability. In Encyclopedia of Production and Manufacturing Management (pp. 825–825). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0612-8_1032
   Google Scholar
• Verhulst, E. (2018). Contribution de l’étude de l’interaction en environnement virtuel: Intérêt de la charge mentale [Phdthesis, Université d’Angers]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02157566
   Google Scholar