Context-Dependent Cognitive Workload Monitoring using Pupillometry for Control Room Operators to Prevent Overload

References

• Abu-Khader, M. M. (2004). Impact of human behaviour on process safety management in developing countries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 82(6), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1205/psep.82.6.431.53206
   Google Scholar
• Bhavsar, P., Srinivasan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2016). Pupillometry based real-time monitoring of operator’s cognitive workload to prevent human error during abnormal situations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 55(12), 3372–3382. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhavsar, P., Srinivasan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2017). Quantifying situation awareness of control room operators using eye-gaze behavior. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 106, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschee, P. (2014). Tackling the Challenges to Develop Effective Safety Cultures. Society of Petroleum Engineers. http://www.spe.org/news/article/tackling-the-challenges-to-develop-effective-safety-cultures
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, L. A., Gartenberg, D., McCurry, J. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2014). Dynamic operator overload: A model for predicting workload during supervisory control. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2013.2293317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, B. (2007). A Review of the Mental Workload Literature. Defence Research and Development Toronto (Canada), 1998, 4-1–4-34. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA474193
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, J., Krokhmal, P. A., Chen, Y., & Murphey, R. (2012). Detection of temporal changes in psychophysiological data using statistical process control methods. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 107(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSB, C. S. B. and H. I. (2022). Incident data.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, E. L., Dinsoreanu, M., & Muresan, R. C. (2020). Accuracy of six interpolation methods applied on pupil diameter data. 2020 22nd IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics – THETA, AQTR 2020 – Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/AQTR49680.2020.9129915
   Google Scholar
• Das, L., Iqbal, M. U., Bhavsar, P., Srinivasan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2018). Toward preventing accidents in process industries by inferring the cognitive state of control room operators through eye tracking. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 6(2), 2517–2528. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42 (3), 462–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heard, J., Harriott, C. E., & Adams, J. A. (2018). A Survey of Workload Assessment Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(5), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2782483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, M. U., Shahab, M. A., Choudhary, M., Srinivasan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2021). Electroencephalography (EEG) based cognitive measures for evaluating the effectiveness of operator training. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 150, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, M. U., Srinivasan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Dynamic assessment of control room operator’s cognitive workload using Electroencephalography (EEG). Computers & Chemical Engineering, 141, 106726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jofriet, P. (2005). Alarm management. Chemical Engineering, 112 (2), 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge, A., Nazir, S., & Manca, D. (2014). Advanced applications in process control and training needs of field and control room operators. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 2(3–4), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2014.920437
   Google Scholar
• Kovesdi, C., Spielman, Z., Leblanc, K., & Rice, B. (2018). Application of eye tracking for measurement and evaluation in human factors studies in control room modernization. Nuclear Technology, 202(2–3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1455461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Wickens, C. D. (1994). Mental workload and cognitive task automaticity: An evaluation of subjective and time estimation metrics. Ergonomics, 37(11), 1843–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408964953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1998). Identifying mental models of complex human-machine systems. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 22(4–5), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00080-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothwang, W. D., McCourt, M. J., Robinson, R. M., Burden, S. A., & Curtis, J. W. (2016). The human should be part of the control loop? Proceedings – 2016 Resilience Week, RWS 2016, 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/RWEEK.2016.7573336
   Google Scholar
• Othman, N., & Romli, F. I. (2016). Mental workload evaluation of pilots using pupil dilation. International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE), 9(3), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v9i3.9541
   Google Scholar
• Pedrotti, M., Mirzaei, M. A., Tedesco, A., Chardonnet, J. R., Mérienne, F., Benedetto, S., & Baccino, T. (2014). Automatic stress classification with pupil diameter analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(3), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.848320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1982). Human errors. A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 4(2–4), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6349(82)90041-4
   Google Scholar
• Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambidge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental psychology. Applied, 9(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.9.2.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwerd, S., & Schulte, A. (2021). Operator state estimation to enable adaptive assistance in manned-unmanned-teaming. Cognitive Systems Research, 67, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, C., Bhavsar, P., Srinivasan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2016). Eye gaze movement studies of control room operators: A novel approach to improve process safety. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 85, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R., Srinivasan, B., Iqbal, M. U., Nemet, A., & Kravanja, Z. (2019). Recent developments towards enhancing process safety: Inherent safety and cognitive engineering. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 128, 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobii. (2010). Tobii Eye Tracking – An introduction to eye tracking and Tobii Eye Trackers. Technology, 12. http://www.tobii.com/Global/Analysis/Training/WhitePapers/Tobii_EyeTracking_Introduction_WhitePaper.pdf?epslanguage=en
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, E., Horváth, I., & Rusák, Z. (2021). Effects of coherent, integrated, and context-dependent adaptable user interfaces on operators’ situation awareness, performance, and workload. Cognition, Technology & Work, 23(3), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00642-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1991). Processing resources in attention. In Multiple-task performance (pp. 32). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, G., Liu, Y., & Shi, Y. (2018). Real-Time Assessment of the Cross-Task Mental, 1–12.
   Google Scholar