Price containment in emissions permit markets: Balancing market risk and environmental outcomes

References

• Bertsekas, D.P. (1999) Nonlinear Programming, second edition, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Birge, J.R. and Louveaux, F. (2010) Introduction to Stochastic Programming, second edition, Springer Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Burtraw, D. and Palmer, K. (2005) Allocation of CO2 emissions allowances in the regional greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program. Technical Report, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Burtraw, D., Palmer, K. and Kahn, D. (2010) A symmetric safety valve. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4921–4932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell, J. and Chen, Y. (2012) Allocation and leakage in cap-and-trade markets for CO2. Resources and Energy Economics, 34(3), 647–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. and Liu, A. (2013) Emissions trading, point-of-regulation and facility siting choices in the electric markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 44(3), 251–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Liu, A. and Hobbs, B. (2011) Economic and emissions implications of load-based, source-based, and first-seller emissions trading programs under California AB32. Operations Research, 59(3), 696–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. and Tseng, C.L. (2011) Inducing clean technology in the electricity sector: Tradable permits or carbon tax policies? The Energy Journal, 32(3), 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, T.J. (1999) Economies of scale and asset values in power production. The Electricity Journal, 12(10), 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenmann, A. and Smeers, Y. (2011) Stochastic equilibrium models for generation capacity expansion, in M. Bertocchi, G. Consigli, M.A.H. Dempster, (eds), Stochastic Optimization Methods in Finance and Energy, pp. 273–310. Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration. (2013) Updated capital cost estimates for utility scale electricity generating plants. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/capitalcost/pdf/updated_capcost.pdf [24 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Facchinei, F. and Pang, J.S. (2007) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Fell, H., Burtraw, D., Morgenstern, R. and Palmer, K. (2012) Soft and hard price collars in a cap-and-trade system: A comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64(2), 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell, H. and Morgenstern, R. (2010) Alternative approaches to cost containment in a cap-and-trade system. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47(2), 275–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, H. (1985) A spatial Nash equilibrium model, in P.T. Harker (ed), Spatial Price Equilibrium: Advances in Theory, Computation and Application, pp. 20–40. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B.F. (2001) Linear complementarity models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and poolco power markets. IEEE Transactions on Power System, 16(2), 194–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibikunle, G., Gregoriou, A. and Pandit, N. (2011) Liquidity effects on carbon financial instruments in the EU emissions trading scheme: New evidence from the Kyoto commitment phase. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1886586. Last accessed: 09/24/2017
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, R., Morgenstern, R. and Pizer, W. (1997) Something for Everyone: A Climate Policy That Both Environmentalists and Industry Can Live With. Weathervane, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V., Ho, J., Hobbs, B.F., Liu, A.L., McCalley, J.D., Shahidehpour, M. and Zheng, Q.P. (2015) Cooptimization of electricity transmission and generation resources for planning and policy analysis: Review of concepts and modeling approaches. Energy Systems, 7(2), 297–332.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A.L. and Hobbs, B.F. (2013) Tacit collusion games in pool-based electricity markets under transmission constraints. Mathematical Programming, 140(2), 351–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda, A. (2012) Setting trigger price in emissions permit markets equipped with a safety valve mechanism. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 41(3), 358–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell, A., Whinson, M.D. and Green, J.R. (1995) Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• McKibbin, W. and Wilcoxen, P. (1997) A better way to slow global climate change. Brookings Policy Brief No.17. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Metzler, C.B. (2000) Complementarity models of competitive oligopolistic electric power generation markets. Ph.D. thesis, Johns Hopkins University, BaltImore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Metzler, C.B., Hobbs, B. and Pang, J.S. (2003) Nash–Cournot equilibria in power markets on a linearized DC network with arbitrage: Formulations and properties. Networks & Spatial Economics, 3(2), 123–150.
   Google Scholar
• Midcontinent Independent System Operator. (2016) MISO transmission expansion planning 49 (MTEP). https://www.misoenergy.org/Planning/TransmissionExpansionPlanning/Pages/TransmissionExpansionPlanning.aspx [25 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Murray, B.C., Newell, R.G. and Pizer, W.A. (2009) Balancing cost and emissions certainty: An allowance reserve for cap-and-trade. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3, 84–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, R., Pizer, W. and Zhang, J. (2005) Managing permit markets to stabilize prices. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(2), 133–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, A., Burtraw, D. and Palmer, K. (2009) Haiku documentation: RFF's electricity market model version 2.0. http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-Rpt-Haiku.v2.0.pdf. [25 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Pizer, W. (2002) Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. Journal of Public Economics, 85(3), 409–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PJM Interconnection. (2015) 2015 Regional transmission expansion plan report. http://www.pjm.com/library/reports-notices/rtep-documentsaspx. [25 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. and Spence, M. (1976) E_uent charges and licenses under uncertainty. Journal of Public Economics, 5(3), 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D. and Ruszczynski, A. (2009) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics and the Mathematical Programming Society, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2016) Power sector modeling. https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/power-sector-modeling [25 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Webster, M., Wing, I. and Jakobovits, L. (2010) Second-best instruments for near-term climate policy: Intensity targets vs. the safety valve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(3), 250–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M.L. (1974) Prices vs. quantities. The Review of Economic Studies, 41(4), 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wets, R.J. (2002) Stochastic programming models: Wait-and-see versus here-and-now, in C. Greengard & A. Ruszczynski (eds), Decision Making Under Uncertainty, pp. 1–15. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. and Jotzo, F. (2011) Price floors for emissions trading. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1746–1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, J., Adler, I. and Oren, S.S. (2008) Modeling and computing two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in a congested electricity network. Operations Research, 56(1), 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar