Robotic-cell scheduling with pick-up constraints and uncertain processing times

References

• Agnetis, A. (2000) Scheduling no-wait robotic cells with two and three machines. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(2), 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytug, H., Lawley, M.A., McKay, K., Mohan, S. and Uzsoy, R. (2005) Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(1), 86–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che, A., Chu, C. and Levner, E. (2003) A polynomial algorithm for 2-degree cyclic robot scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crama, Y. and van de Klundert, J. (1997) Cyclic scheduling of identical parts in a robotic cell. Operations Research, 45(6), 952–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawande, M., Geismar, H.N., Pinedo, M. and Sriskandarajah, C. (2009a) Throughput optimization in dual-gripper interval robotic cells. IIE Transactions, 42(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawande, M., Geismar, H.N., Sethi, S.P. and Sriskandarajah, C. (2005) Sequencing and scheduling in robotic cells: recent developments. Journal of Scheduling, 8(5), 387–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawande, M., Pinedo, M. and Sriskandarajah, C. (2009b) Multiple part-type production in robotic cells: Equivalence of two real-world models. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(2), 210–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geismar, H.N., Dawande, M.W. and Sethi, S.P. (2005) Dominance of cyclic solutions and challenges in the scheduling of robotic cells. SIAM Review, 47(4), 709–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geismar, H.N., Dawande, M. and Sriskandarajah, C. (2006) Throughput optimization in constant travel‐time dual gripper robotic cells with parallel machines. Production and Operations Management, 15(2), 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geismar, H.N. and Pinedo, M. (2010) Robotic cells with stochastic processing times. IIE Transactions, 42(12), 897–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundogdu, E. and Gultekin, H. (2016) Scheduling in two-machine robotic cells with a self-buffered robot. IIE Transactions, 48(2), 170–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, K.S., Geismar, H.N., Pinedo, M. and Sriskandarajah, C. (2015) Approximations to optimal sequences in single-gripper and dual-gripper robotic cells with circular layouts. IIE Transactions, 47(6), 634–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, K.S., Geismar, H.N., Pinedo, M. and Sriskandarajah, C. (2017) Throughput optimization in circular dual-gripper robotic cells. Production and Operations Management, 27(2), 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. and Lee, T.E. (2012) An efficient mixed integer programming model based on timed Petri nets for diverse complex cluster tool scheduling problems. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 25(2), 186–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kats, V. and Levner, E. (2002) Cyclic scheduling in a robotic production line. Journal of Scheduling, 5(1), 23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.H. and Lee, T.E. (2008) Schedulability analysis of time-constrained cluster tools with bounded time variation by an extended Petri net. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 5(3), 490–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Ramanan, N. and Sriskandarajah, C. (2005) Minimizing cycle time in large robotic cells. IIE Transactions, 37(2), 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T.E. (2008) A review of scheduling theory and methods for semiconductor manufacturing cluster tools, in S. J. Mason, R. R. Hill, L. Mönch, O. Rose, T. Jefferson, and J. W. Fowler (eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2127–2135, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. Available at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4736310.
   Google Scholar
• Levner, E., Kats, V. and Levit, V.E. (1997) An improved algorithm for cyclic flowshop scheduling in a robotic cell. European Journal of Operational Research, 97(3), 500–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, C.R., Qiao, Y., Zhou, M.C. and Wu, N.Q. (2015) Scheduling and analysis of start-up transient processes for dual-arm cluster tools with wafer revisiting. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 28(2), 160–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, Y., Wu, N.Q. and Zhou, M.C. (2014) Scheduling of dual-arm cluster tools with wafer revisiting and residency time constraints. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(1), 286–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, Y., Wu, N.Q. and Zhou, M.C. (2015) Schedulability and scheduling analysis of dual-arm cluster tools with wafer revisiting and residency time constraints based on a novel schedule. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 45(3), 472–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, S.J., Cherry, G., Good, R., Wang, J. and Harrison, C.A. (2006) Semiconductor manufacturing process control and monitoring: A fab-wide framework. Journal of Process Control, 16(3), 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabuncuoglu, I. and Bayız, M. (2000) Analysis of reactive scheduling problems in a job shop environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 567–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriskandarajah, C., Drobouchevitch, I., Sethi, S.P. and Chandrasekaran, R. (2004) Scheduling multiple parts in a robotic cell served by a dual-gripper robot. Operations Research, 52(1), 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriskandarajah, C. and Shetty, B. (2018) A review of recent theoretical development in scheduling dual-gripper robotic cells. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 817–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonke, D. and Lee, T.E. (2015) Modeling, analysis, and scheduling of cluster tools with two independent arms. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 13(2), 1176–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, N.Q. and Zhou, M.C. (2010) Analysis of wafer sojourn time in dual-arm cluster tools with residency time constraint and activity time variation. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 23(1), 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, N.Q. and Zhou, M.C. (2012a) Modeling, analysis and control of dual-arm cluster tools with residency time constraint and activity time variation based on Petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 9(2), 446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, N.Q. and Zhou, M.C. (2012b) Schedulability analysis and optimal scheduling of dual-arm cluster tools with residency time constraint and activity time variation. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 9(1), 203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, N.Q., Zhou, M.C., Peng, S.S., Chu, F. and Chu, C. (2008) Petri net modeling and real-time control of dual-arm cluster tools with residency time constraint and activity time variations, in Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Wu, N., Qiao, Y. and Su, R. (2018) Polynomial approach to optimal one-wafer cyclic scheduling of treelike hybrid multi-cluster tools via Petri nets. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 5(1), 270–280.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Wu, N.Q., Qiao, Y. and Zhou, M.C. (2014) Petri net-based polynomially complex approach to optimal one-wafer cyclic scheduling of hybrid multi-cluster tools in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(12), 1598–1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Wu, N.Q., Qiao, Y., Zhou, M.C. and Li, Z. (2017) Scheduling of single-arm cluster tools for an atomic layer deposition process with residency time constraints. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 47(3), 502–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Fang, X. and Qi, L. (2014) LCM cycle based optimal scheduling in robotic cell with parallel workstations, in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1367–1373.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Wu, N.Q., Qiao, Y. and Zhou, M.C. (2016) Optimal scheduling of complex multi-cluster tools based on timed resource-oriented Petri nets. IEEE Access, 4, 2096–2109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Zhou, M., Qiao, Y. and Wu, N. (2017). Scheduling transient processes for time-constrained single-arm robotic multi-cluster tools. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 30(3), 261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Zhou, M., Qiao, Y. and Wu, N. (2018) Petri net modeling and scheduling of a close-down process for time-constrained single-arm cluster tools. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(3), 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar