Toolpath planning for multi-gantry additive manufacturing

References

• Antonio, F. (1992) IV.6 - Faster line segment intersection, in Graphics Gems III (IBM Version), David Kirk, San Francisco, pp. 199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Atwell, C. (2016) Autodesk’s project Escher uses multiple 3D print heads for massive jobs. Available at: https://makezine.com/2016/03/24/autodesk-introduces-mass-3d-printing-project-escher/ (accessed 6 August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Bui, H. (2019) Toolpath planning methodology for multi-gantry fused filament fabrication 3D printing, Theses and Dissertations, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AK
   Google Scholar
• Bui, H., Pierson, H.A., Nurre, S.G. and Sullivan K.M. (2019) Tool path planning optimization for multi-tool additive manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 457–464.
   Google Scholar
• Castelino, K., D’Souza, R. and Wright, P.K. (2003) Toolpath optimization for minimizing airtime during machining. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 22(3), 173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z.C., Vickers, G.W. and Dong, Z. (2004) A new principle of CNC tool path planning for three-axis sculptured part machining—A steepest-ascending tool path. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 126(3), 515–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S.H. and Zhu, W.K. (2010) A dynamic priority-based approach to concurrent toolpath planning for multi-material layered manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design, 42(12), 1095–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, B.G. and Lewis, J.A. (2014) 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Advanced Materials, 26(34), 5930–5935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozier, A.D., Harned, K.E., Riley, M.A., Raabe, B.H., Sommers, A.D. and Pierson, H.A. (2015) Additive manufacturing in the design of an engine air particle separator. in Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, ASME Press, Houston, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Fok, K.Y., Cheng, C.T., Ganganath, N., Iu, H.H. and Tse, C.K. (2018) Accelerating 3D printing process using an extended ant colony optimization algorithm, in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ganganath, N., Cheng, C.T., Fok, K.Y. and Tse, C.K. (2016) Trajectory planning for 3D printing: A revisit to traveling salesman problem, in Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics, IEEE, Hong Kong, China, pp. 287–290.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, F. (2001) Tabu search, in Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 821–827.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, N. (2014) The 3&Dbot robotic 3D printer takes 3D printing on the road. Available at: https://www.thecoolist.com/3dbot-robotic-3d-printer/ (accessed 6 August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Hmeidat, N.S., Kemp, J.W. and Compton, B.G. (2018) High-strength epoxy nanocomposites for 3D printing. Composites Science and Technology, 160, 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., Pierson, H.A. and Liao, H. (2017) Concurrent fused filament fabrication with multiple extruders, in Proceedings of the 67th Annual Conference and Expo of the Institute of Industrial Engineers 2017, IISE, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 940–945.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., Pierson, H.A. and Liao, H. (2019) Toolpath allocation and scheduling for concurrent fused filament fabrication with multiple extruders. IISE Transactions, 51(2), 192–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, O. and Jouaneh, M. (2005) Minimization of airtime in cutting and welding applications, in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 3300–3305.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. (2012) Wing - 23012 aerofoil section. Available at: https://grabcad.com/library/wing-23012-aerofoil-section#_=_ (accessed 7 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• LaValle, S.M. and Hutchinson, S.A. (1998) Optimal motion planning for multiple robots having independent goals. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(6), 912–925.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.Y., An, J. and Chua, C.K. (2017) Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Applied Materials Today, 7, 120–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.H. and Kim, J.H. (2006) Multi-robot cooperation-based mobile printer system. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 54(3), 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Li, Y. and Liu, S. (2016) Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 238, 218–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.Y. and Latombe, J.C. (1995) On-line manipulation planning for two robot arms in a dynamic environment, in Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1048–1055.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., Fu, J., Shen, H., Gan, W. and Yue, S. (2015) Tool path generation for multi-axis freeform surface finishing with the LKH TSP solver. Computer-Aided Design, 69, 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, L.G., Williams, R.A. and Zhou, W. (2017) A mobile 3D printer for cooperative 3D printing, in Proceeding of the 28th International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, pp. 1645–1660.
   Google Scholar
• Netfabb (2018) Autodesk knowledge network. Available at: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/netfabb/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2018/ENU/NETF/files/GUID-E2E1110F-CA7F-4580-8E9C-250B796B6E05-htm.html (accessed 7 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Oysu, C. and Bingul, Z. (2007) Tool path optimization using genetic algorithms, in Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Methods, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Peasgood, M., Clark, C.M. and McPhee, J. (2008) A complete and scalable strategy for coordinating multiple robots within roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(2), 283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, H.A., Celik, E., Abbott, A., DeJarnette, H., Gutierrez, L.S., Johnson, K., Koerner, H. and Baur, J.W. (2019) Mechanical properties of printed epoxy-carbon fiber composites. Experimental Mechanics, 59, 843–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PLM Technology (2019) Bracket topology optimization 2. Available at: https://grabcad.com/library/bracket-topology-optimization-2-1 (accessed 7 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, A.M. and Ferreira, J.S. (2001) Solving the rural postman problem by memetic algorithms, in Proceedings of the 4th Metaheuristic International Conference, Porto, Portugal, pp. 679–684.
   Google Scholar
• Salaets, B. (2018) Rotor hub wind turbine. Available at: https://grabcad.com/library/rotor-hub-wind-turbine-1 (accessed 7 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. (2018) Proximity pays - how multiple lasers can work together on high-integrity parts. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/proximity-pays-how-multiple-lasers-can-work-parts-marc-saunders/ (accessed 21 January 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Titan Robotics (2017) The cronus. Available at: https://titan3drobotics.com/the-cronus/ (accessed 8 July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Todt, E., Rausch, G. and Suarez, R. (2000) Analysis and classification of multiple robot coordination methods, in Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 3158–3163.
   Google Scholar
• Volpato, N., Nakashima, R.T., Galvao, L.C., Barboza, A.O., Benevides, P.F. and Nunes, L.F. (2014) Reducing repositioning distances in fused deposition-based processes using optimization algorithms, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, CRC Press, Leiria, Portugal, pp. 417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, I.A., Altshuler, Y., Yanovsky, V. and Bruckstein, A.M. (2008) Cooperative cleaners: A study in ant robotics. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 27(1), 127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wah, P.K., Murty, K.G., Joneja, A. and Chiu, L.C. (2002) Tool path optimization in layered manufacturing. IIE Transactions, 34(4), 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. and Burdick, J. (2006). Multi-robot boundary coverage with plan revision, in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1716–1723.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcik, M., Koszalka, L., Pozniak-Koszalka, I. and Kasprzak, A. (2015) MZZ-GA algorithm for solving path optimization in 3D printing, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Systems, IARIA Press, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Li, M., Hui Lim, J., Weng, Y., Tay, Y.W.D., Pham, H. and Pham, Q.C. (2018) Large-scale 3D printing by a team of mobile robots. Automation in Construction, 95, 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar