Low-carbon technology transfer between rival firms under cap-and-trade policies

References

• Anand, K. and Giraud-Carrier, F. (2020) Pollution regulation of competitive markets. Management Science, 66(9), 4193–4206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariño, A., Reuer, J.J., Mayer, K.J. and Jané, J. (2014) Contracts, negotiation, and learning: An examination of termination provisions. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 379–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A. and Ceccagnoli, M. (2006) Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing. Management Science, 52(2), 293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulakh, P.S., Jiang, M.S. and Pan, Y. (2010) International technology licensing: Monopoly rents, transaction costs and exclusive rights. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 587–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, B., Yeo, J., Koh, S. and Ferguson, A. (2020) Doubling down: Europe's low-carbon investment opportunity. Available at https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2020/feb/doubling-down.html (accessed 12 May 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Baron, O., Berman, O. and Wu, D. (2016) Bargaining within the supply chain and its implications in an industry. Decision Sciences, 47(2), 193–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrieu, P. and Fehr, M. (2014) Market-consistent modeling for cap-and-trade schemes and application to option pricing. Operations Research, 62(2), 234–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgiç, T. and Güllü, R. (2016) Innovation race under revenue and technology uncertainty of heterogeneous firms where the winner does not take all. IIE Transactions, 48(6), 527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A.M. and Nalebuff, B.J. (1996) Co-opetition, Doubleday, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Caro, F., Corbett, C.J., Tan, T. and Zuidwijk, R. (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 15(4), 545–558.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, Q., Xiao, Z. and Zhou, G. (2020) Competitive strategies for original equipment manufacturers considering carbon cap and trade. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Wang, X. and Xia, Y. (2019) Production coopetition strategies for competing manufacturers that produce partially substitutable products. Production and Operations Management, 28(6), 1446–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. and Hobbs, B.F. (2005) An oligopolistic power market model with tradable NOx permits. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20(1), 119–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A. and Glachant, M. (2014) Does foreign environmental policy influence domestic innovation? Evidence from the wind industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58(3), 391–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., Neumayer, E. and Perkins, R. (2015) Environmental regulation and the cross-border diffusion of new technology: Evidence from automobile patents. Research Policy, 44(1), 244–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021a) Climate action: Reducing emissions from aviation. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/aviation_en (accessed 21April 2021).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021b) Climate action: Allocation to industrial installations. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/allowances/industrial_en (accessed 21April 2021).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021c) Allocation to aviation: Cap on total allowances. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/allowances/aviation_en (accessed 21April 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Fosfuri, A. (2006) The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, M. (2012) Emissions trading: Cap and trade finds new energy. Nature, 491(7426), 666–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Lawrence, P.R. and Puranam, P. (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 415–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezalkotob, A. (2017) Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 97, 228–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B.H. and Helmers, C. (2010) The role of patent protection in (clean) technology transfer. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 26(4), 487–532.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B.H. and Helmers, C. (2013) Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(1), 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C., O’Callaghan, B., Stern, N., Stiglitz, J. and Zenghelis, D. (2020) Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(S1), 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, B., Hu, M. and Yang, Y. (2017) Open or closed? Technology sharing, supplier investment, and competition. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 19(1), 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Leng, M., Liang, L. and Liu, J. (2013) Promoting electric automobiles: Supply chain analysis under a government’s subsidy incentive scheme. IIE Transactions, 45(8), 826–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.L. and Lee, S.H. (2014) Eco-technology licensing under emission tax: Royalty vs. fixed-fee. Korean Economic Review, 30, 273–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.L. and Lee, S.H. (2016a) Optimal two-part tariff licensing strategies of eco-technology. Firms’ Strategic Decisions: Theoretical and Empirical Findings, 2, 217–238.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.L. and Lee, S.H. (2016b) The licensing of eco-technology under emission tax: Fixed-fee vs. auction. International Review of Economics and Finance, 45, 343–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury, T.A., Pleggenkuhle-Miles, E.G. and Walter, J. (2019) Experiential learning, bargaining power, and exclusivity in technology licensing. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1193–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, J. and Wolak, F. (2003) Using environmental emissions permit prices to raise electricity prices: Evidence from the California electricity market, University California Energy Inst., Berkeley, CA, CSEM Working Paper CSEM WP-113.
   Google Scholar
• Kotha, R., Crama, P. and Kim, P.H. (2018) Experience and signaling value in technology licensing contract payment structures. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1307–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenovo Newsroom (2017) Lenovo™ announces breakthrough, innovative PC manufacturing process. Available at http://news.lenovo.com/news-releases/lenovo-announces-breakthrough-innovative-pc-manufacturing-process.htm (accessed 11 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J.Y., Zhou, S.X. and Gao, F. (2019) Production and technology choice under emissions regulation: Centralized vs decentralized supply chains. IISE Transactions, 51(1), 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A. and Chen, Y. (2017) Price containment in emissions permit markets: Balancing market risk and environmental outcomes. IISE Transactions, 49(12), 1129–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Z., Chen, X. and Wang, X. (2016) The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(2), 392–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantovani, A. and Ruiz-Aliseda, F. (2016) Equilibrium innovation ecosystems: The dark side of collaborating with complementors. Management Science, 62(2), 534–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.J., Cachon, G.P., Lai, G. and Seshadri, S. (2015) Supply chain design and carbon penalty: Monopoly vs. monopolistic competition. Production and Operations Management, 24(9), 1494–1508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, D. and Stamatopoulos, G. (2016) Licensing under general demand and cost functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(3), 673–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, W., Ha, A.Y. and Tong, S. (2016) Information sharing in a supply chain with a common retailer. Management Science, 62(1), 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, F., Sošić, G. and Debo, L. (2019) Manufacturers’ competition and cooperation in sustainability: Stable recycling alliances. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D. and Walker, H. (2014) Managing imbalanced supply chain relationships for sustainability: A power perspective. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 577–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Hua, Z., Xia, Y. and Huo, B. (2016) Dynamic multi-technology production-inventory problem with emissions trading. IIE Transactions, 48(2), 110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar