The implications of rating systems on workforce performance

References

• Barlevy, G. and Neal, D. (2019) Allocating effort and talent in professional labor markets. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(1), 187–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Harbring, C. and Sliwka, D. (2013) Performance appraisals and the impact of forced distribution: An experimental investigation. Management Science, 59(1), 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell, M. (2011) Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 369–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimpikis, K., Ehsani, S. and Mostagir, M. (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Operations Research, 67(2), 339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, B.D., Baldwin, T.T. and Rubin, R.S. (2009) Reactions to different types of forced distribution performance evaluation systems. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, B.D., Rubin, R.S. and Baldwin, T.T. (2013) Who is attracted to an organisation using a forced distribution performance management system? Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 360–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce, P. and Martinez-Jerez, F.A. (2009) Relative performance compensation, contests, and dynamic incentives. Management Science, 55(8), 1306–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, W.F. and Aguinis, H. (2018) Applied Psychology in Talent Management, SAGE Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Corgnet, B., Gómez-Miñambres, J. and Hernán-Gonzalez, R. (2015) Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Science, 61(12), 2926–2944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corgnet, B., Gómez-Miñambres, J. and Hernán-Gonzalez, R. (2018) Goal setting in the principal–agent model: Weak incentives for strong performance. Games and Economic Behavior, 109, 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crama, P., Sting, F.J. and Wu, Y. (2019) Encouraging help across projects. Management Science, 65(3), 1408–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of the Army (2019) Army Regulation 623-3: Evaluation reporting system. https://bit.ly/3rfvtj2 (accessed 3 August 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, J. (2018) Measure What Matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World with OKRs, Penguin, New York, NY
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L.A. (2018) Simulation-based analysis and optimization of the United States Army performance appraisal system. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KT.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J. and Gómez-Miñambres, J. (2020) Nonbinding goals in teams: A real effort coordination experiment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(5), 1026–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S. and Waldman, M. (2010) Standard promotion practices versus up-or-out contracts. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(2), 301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, D., Kissová, Z., Lee, J. and Prowse, V. (2019) First-place loving and last-place loathing: How rank in the distribution of performance affects effort provision. Management Science, 65(2), 494–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffin, R.D., Gellatly, I.R., Paunonen, S.V., Jackson, D.N. and Meyer, J.P. (1996) Criterion validation of two approaches to performance appraisal: The behavioral observation scale and the relative percentile method. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11(1), 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffin, R.D., Jelley, R.B., Powell, D.M. and Johnston, N.G. (2009) Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: The relative percentile method. Human Resource Management, 48(2), 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J.R. and Stokey, N.L. (1983) A comparison of tournaments and contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbring, C. and Irlenbusch, B. (2003) An experimental study on tournament design. Labour Economics, 10(4), 443–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbring, C. and Lünser, G.K. (2008) On the competition of asymmetric agents. German Economic Review, 9(3), 373–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölmstrom, B. (1979) Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1(1), 74–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, T., Hazra, J. and Gavirneni, S. (2019) Ranking-based versus outcome-linked incentive systems: Designing an effective compensation system. Cornell University Working paper. Available at SSRN 3326721.
   Google Scholar
• Jalava, N., Joensen, J.S. and Pellas, E. (2015) Grades and rank: Impacts of non-financial incentives on test performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 161–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, S. and Meaney, M. (2017) Attracting and retaining the right talent. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/attracting-and-retaining-the-right-talent (accessed 3 August 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu, E. and Cho, S.-H. (2017) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Science 64(6), 2709–2715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H.D. and Yoo, O.S. (2017) Retention of capable new employees under uncertainty: Impact of strategic interactions. IISE Transactions, 49(10), 927–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, I. (2013) Risk-taking in subjective promotion tournaments. Applied Economics Letters, 20(13), 1238–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, F.J. and Farr, J.L. (1980) Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87(1), 72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, E.P. and Rosen, S. (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P. (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. and Schmidt, C. (2010) How to keep your top talent. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinert, D. (2015) Is it time to put the performance review on a PIP. HR Magazine, 60(3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mihm, J. and Schlapp, J. (2018) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Science, 65(2), 559–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklós-Thal, J. and Ullrich, H. (2014) Belief precision and effort incentives in promotion contests. The Economic Journal, 125(589), 1952–1963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldovanu, B. and Sela, A. (2006) Contest architecture. Journal of Economic Theory, 126(1), 70–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalebuff, B.J. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1983) Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1(1), 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, B. (2013) Foundations and Methods of Stochastic Simulation: A First Course. Springer Science & Business Media, New York NY.
   Google Scholar
• Orrison, A., Schotter, A. and Weigelt, K. (2004) Multiperson tournaments: An experimental examination. Management Science, 50(2), 268–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani, M. and Ramachandran, K. (2020) Delegating innovation projects with deadline: Committed versus flexible stopping. Management Science. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3800.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani, M., Roels, G. and Karmarkar, U.S. (2018) Team leadership and performance: Combining the roles of direction and contribution. Management Science, 64(11), 5234–5249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roch, S.G., Sternburgh, A.M. and Caputo, P.M. (2007) Absolute vs relative performance rating formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(3), 302–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, R. and Hunter, J.E. (1991) Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 322–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roels, G. and Tang, C.S. (2017) Win-win capacity allocation contracts in coproduction and codistribution alliances. Management Science, 63(3), 861–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohman, J., Onyeagoro, C. and Bushl, M. (2018) How you promote people can make or break company culture. Harvard Business Review, 1–5. https://hbr.org/2018/01/how-you-promote-people-can-make-or-break-company-culture (accessed 3 August 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Schreck, P. (2020) Volume or value? How relative performance information affects task strategy and performance. Journal of Business Economics 90, 733–755. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00974-2.
   Google Scholar
• Scullen, S.E., Bergey, P.K. and Aiman-Smith, L. (2005) Forced distribution rating systems and the improvement of workforce potential: A baseline simulation. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. (1982) Paired comparison evaluations of managerial effectiveness by peers and supervisors. Personnel Psychology, 35(4), 843–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan, N., Agarwal, D., Garr, S. and Pastakia, K. (2017) Performance management: Playing a winning hand. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2017/redesigning-performance-management.html (accessed 3 August 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C. and Xu, Y. (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54(9), 1529–1543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, S.H. and Goffin, R.D. (1997) Differences in accuracy of absolute and comparative performance appraisal methods. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2), 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, M. (2013) Classic promotion tournaments versus market-based tournaments. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(3), 198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B., Wan, Z. and Levinthal, D.A. (2014) Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1257–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2016) Deadlines in product development. Management Science, 62(11), 3310–3326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorc, S., Chick, S.E. and Hasija, S. (2017) Outcomes-based reimbursement policies for chronic care pathways. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2017/35/DSC/TOM. Fontainbleau, France.
   Google Scholar