The Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation: Reliability, Factorial Structure, and Sensitivity to Measure Behavioral Changes

References

• Alexanders, R. T., Green, F. N., O’Mahony, B., Gunaratna, I. J., Gangadharan, S. K., & Hoare, S. (2010). Personality disorders in offenders with intellectual disability: A comparison of clinical, forensic and outcome variables and implications for service provision. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 7, 650–658. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01248.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Providence, RI: Matthew Bender.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2010a). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Guzzo, L., Raynor, P., Rowe, R. C., Rettinger, L. J., Brews, A., & Wormith, S. (2011). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 113–133. doi:10.1177/0306624X10395716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkisson, C., Cook, J., Karno, M., Lehman, A., mcGlashan, T. H., Meltzer, H. Y., O'Connor, M., Richardson, D., Rosenblatt, A., Wells, k., Williams, J., Principal NIMH, Staff Liaison, & Hohman, A. A. (1992). Clinical services research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 18, 561–626. doi:10.1093/schbul/18.4.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Authors. (2012). [Title omitted for blind review].
   Google Scholar
• Authors. (under review). [Title omitted for blind review]. Author. (2011)
   Google Scholar
• Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 314(7080), 572. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2002). Validating scales and indexes. BMJ, 324(7337), 606–607. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7337.606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaerts, S., Spreen, M., Ter Horst, P., & Gerlsma, C. (2017). Predictive validity of the HKT- R Risk Assessment: Two and 5-year violent recidivism in a nationwide sample of Dutch forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–12. doi:10.1177/0306624X17717128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaerts, S., Vanheule, S., & DeClercq, F. (2005). Recalled parental bonding, adult attachment style, and personality disorders in child molesters: A comparative study. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16, 445–458. doi:10.1080/14789940500094524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and treatment (User report no. 2007–06). Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from https://cpoc.memberclicks.netassets/Realignment/risk_need_2007-06_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buschman, J., Bogaerts, S., Foulger, S., Wilcox, D., Sosnowski, D., & Cushman, B. (2010). Sexual history disclosure polygraph examinations with cybercrime offences: A first Dutch explorative study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 395–411. doi:10.1177/0306624X09334942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlier, I. V. E., Meuldijk, D., van Vliet, I. M., Van Fennema, E. M., van der Wee, N. J. A., & Zitman, F. G. (2012). Empirische evidence voor de effectiviteit van routine outcome monitoring; Een literatuur onderzoek [Empirical evidence for the effectiveness of routine outcome montoring: A study of the literature]. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie, 2, 121–128. Retrieved from http://www.tijdschriftvoorpsychiatrie.nl/issues/450/articles/9326
   Google Scholar
• Coid, J. W., Ullrich, S., Kallis, C., Keers, R., Barker, D., Cowden, F., & Stamps, R. (2013). The relationship between delusions and violence: Findings from the East London First Episode Psychosis Study. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(5), 465–471. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beurs, E., & Zitman, F. G. (2007). Routine outcome monitoring. Het meten van therapie- effect in de klinische praktijk met webbased software. [Routine outcome monitoring: Measuring therapy effects in clinical practic with webbased software]. Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, 62, 13–28. Retrieved from http://www.zorgnetvlaanderen.be/publicatie/Documents/Andere/Routine%20outcome%20monitoring%20de%20Beurs%20Zitman%20mgv2007-1-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, C., & Trestman, R. L. (2007). Prevalence and treatment of personality disorders in dutch forensic mental health services. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 35, 92–97. Retrieved from http://www.jaapl.org/content/35/1/92.full.pdf+html
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vogel, V., De Ruiter, C., & Bouman, Y. (2007). Meting van protectieve factoren en het belang ervan voor behandeling in de forensische setting. [Measuring protective factors and the importance within treatment in a forensic setting]. Tijdschrift Voor Psychotherapie, 33, 102–119. doi:10.1007/BF03062262
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, G., Sugarman, P., & Walker, L. (2007). HoNOS-secure: A reliable outcome measure for users of secure and forensic mental health services. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 4, 507–514. doi:10.1080/14789940701492279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen. Behandelduur TBS omlaag. [Treatment period TBS lowered]. Retrieved from https://www.dji.nl/actueel/behandelduur-tbs-omlaag.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3 historical, clinical, risk management (version 3): Professional guidelines for evaluating risk of violence. Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, P. M. (1988). Outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. The New England Journal of Medicine, 23, 1549–1556. doi:10.1056/NEJM198806093182329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., & Yu, R. (2011). Psychotic disorders and repeat offending: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37, 800–810. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, R., Chambers, J., Burns, T., Doll, H., Fazel, S., Jenkinson, C., . . . Yiend, J. (2010). A systematic review of outcome measures used in forensic mental health research with consensus panel opinion. Health Technology Assessment, 18, 1–91. doi:10.3310/hta14180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals, K., & van Marle, H. J. C. (2012). Routine outcome monitoring in de forensische psychiatrie: Een lang verhaal in het kort. [Routine outcome monitoring in forensic psychiatry: A long story cut short]. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie, 2, 179–183. Retrieved from http://www.tijdschriftvoorpsychiatrie.nl/issues/450/articles/9335
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23–34. Retreived from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402032/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hildebrand, M., Hesper, B. L., Spreen, M., & Nijman, H. L. I. (2005). De waarde van gestructureerde risicotaxatie en van de diagnose psychopathie. Een onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid en predictieve validiteit. [The value structured risk assessment and the diagnoses psychopathy. A study of the reliability and predictive validity]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Expertise Centrum Forensische Psychiatrie.
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, M., Bogaerts, S., & Winkel, F. (2009). Peer and inmate aggression, type D-personality and posttraumatic stress among Dutch prison workers. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 25(5), 387–395. doi:10.1002/smi.1247View
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. International Biometric Society, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, S.-O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 1-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37, 412–421. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.580697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. “https://www.springer.com/psychology/cognitive+psychology/journal/13428” Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402. Retrieved from: https://www.springer.com/psychology/cognitive+psychology/journal/13428
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palermo, G. B. (2009). [Editorial.] Delinquency: Risks and protective factors. Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 247–248. doi:10.1177/0306624X09335886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe, S., Huxley, P., & Knight, S. (1999). Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 45, 7–12. doi:10.1177/002076409904500102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe, S, Huxley, P, Knight, S & Evans, S. (1999). Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of quality of life (MANSA). International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 45, 7–12. doi:10.1177/002076409904500102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, C. E., & Dolan, M. C. (2010). The significance of protective factors in the assessment of risk. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 20, 8–22. doi:10.1002/cbm.750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuringa, E. (2011). Een voorbeeld uit het patiënt volg systeem van het FPC Dr. S. van Mesdag. GGzet Wetenschappelijk, 2, 70–77. [An example of the “patient following” system of the FPC Dr. S. Van Mesdag]. Retrieved from http://static.mesdag.wdmc.eu/niAe9OzHKU-x2JO03A57HQ/TW4xvBca2ENSZYBwBXk9Pg/WG-qCbngKklSiZk6ShJEGw/Een%20voorbeeldcasus%20uit%20het%20Patient%20Volg%20Systeem%20-%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schuringa, E., Spreen, M., & Bogaerts, S. (2014). Inter-rater and test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and factorial structure of the instrument for forensic treatment evaluation. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 127–144. doi:10.1080/15228932.2014.897536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreen, M., Brand, E., Ter Horst, P., & Bogaerts, S. (2014). Handleiding, historische klinische toekomst-revisie versie 2014 [Manual, historical, clinical, future, revised version 2014]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Stichting FPC Dr. S. van Mesdag.
   Google Scholar
• Stinckens, N., Smits, D., Claes, L., & Soenen, S. (2012). Zinvol “rommen”: Zoeken naar een evenwicht tussen gebruiksvriendelijkheid en klinische relevantie. [Meaningful “romming” (routine outcome monitoring): Seeking a balance between userfriendliness and clinical relevance.]. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie, 2, 161–165. Retrieved from http://www.tijdschriftvoorpsychiatrie.nl/assets/articles/TvP12-02_p161-165.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L. (2013). “A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales”, In Streiner, D. L. (ed.), A Guide for the Statistically Perplexed: Selected Readings for Clinical Researchers (pp. 267–288). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto press.
   Google Scholar
• Surjadi, B., Horn, J., van Bogaerts, S., & Bullens, R. (2010). Internet offending: Sexual and non-sexual functions within a Dutch sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(1), 47–58. doi:10.1080/13552600903470054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskforce behandelduur tbs. (2014). Meerjarenafspraken forensische zorg 2013-2018. Bevindingen en aanbevelingen. [Long term agreements forensic care 2013-18. Findings and recommendations]. Den Haag; Taskforce behandelduur tbs.
   Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwenhuizen, C. H., Bogaerts, S., De Ruijter, E. A. W., Bongers, I. L., Coppens, M., & Meijers, R. A. A. C. (2011). TBS-behandeling geprofileerd; een gestructureerde casussenanalyse [Profiling TBS-treatment: A structured cases analysis]. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC) Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie. Retrieved from http://www.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/voorstudie-onderzoek-tbs.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veeken, F.C.A. (2011). Routine outcome monitoring in the forensic psychiatric centre “The Kijvelanden” (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=122766
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veeken, F. C. A., Bogaerts, S., Lucieer, J. (2012). Routine outcome monitoring in forensic psychiatry: FPC 2landen and FPC de Kijvelanden. In T. I. Oei & M. S. Groenhuijsen (Eds.), Progression in forensic psychiatry (pp. 355–375). Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veeken, F. C. A., Bogaerts, S., Lucieer, J. (2016). Patient profiles in Dutch forensic psychiatry, based on risk factors, pathology and offense, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–23. doi:10.1177/0306624X15619636
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veeken, F. C. A., Bogaerts, S., Lucieer, J. (2017). Patient profiles in Dutch forensic psychiatry based on risk factors pathology and offense. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 1369–1391. doi:10.1177/0306624X15619636
   Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwenhuizen, C., Schene, A. H., & Koeter, M. W. J. (2000). Manchester - verkorte kwaliteit van leven meting [ The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life]. Eindhoven, Netherlands. Institute of Mental Health Care Eindhoven
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Gannon, T. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77–94. doi:10.1016/l/avb.2005.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 353–360. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. C. P., Gordon, A., & Gu, D. Q. (2007). Assessment and treatment of violence-prone forensic clients: An integrated approach. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, S66–S74. supplement: 49. doi:10.1192/bjp.190.5.s66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooditch, A., Tang, L. L., & Taxman, F. S. (2014). Which Criminogentic Need Changes are most important in promoting desistance from crime and substance use? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(3), 276–299. doi:10.1177/0093854813503543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Whiteside, U., & Neighbors, C. (2007). Differences in inter-rater reliability and accuracy for a treatment adherence scale. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 4, 230–239. doi:10.1080/16506070701584367
   Google Scholar
• Yiend, J., Chambers, J. C., Burns, T., Doll, H., Fazel, S., Kaur, A., Fitzpatrick, R. (2011). Outcome measurement in forensic mental health research: An evaluation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 277–292. doi:10.1080/10683160903203938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar