Adherence to Structured Risk Assessment Guidelines: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Adherence Scale for the START:AV

References

• American Psychological Association. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenstein, S. M., Gross, D., Garvey, C., Hill, C., Fogg, L., & Resnick, B. (2010). Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Gude, W. T., Blakeman, T., van der Veer, S. N., Ivers, N., Francis, J. J., Lorencatto, F., Presseau, J., Peek, N., & Daker-White, G. (2019). Clinical performance feedback intervention theory (CP-FIT): A new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Implementation Science, 14(1), 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beuf, T. L. F., de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2019). Implementing the START:AV in a Dutch residential youth facility: Outcomes of success. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 5(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000193
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, A. J. B. M., Bakker, T. J., de Vreede, P. L., van Wijngaarden, J. D. H., Steyerberg, E. W., Mackenbach, J. P., & Nieboer, A. P. (2013). The prevention and reactivation care program: Intervention fidelity matters. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-29
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20^V3: Assessing risk of violence – User guide. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, L. M., Collier-Meek, M. A., Kurtz, K. D., & DeFouw, E. R. (2018). Emailed implementation support to promote treatment integrity: Comparing the effectiveness and acceptability of prompts and performance feedback. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutheil, T. G., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2000). Clinical handbook of psychiatry and the law (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. S. (2017). The structured professional judgement approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In D. P. Boer, A. R. Beech, T. Ward, L. A. Craig, M. Rettenberger, L. E. Marshall, & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, and treatment of sexual offending (pp. 643–666). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574003
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119977018
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, F., van Offenbeek, M. A. G., Dekker, R., Hettinga, F. J., Hoekstra, T., van der Woude, L. H. V., & van der Schans, C. P., & ReSpAct group. (2017). Implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings: Managing tensions in rehabilitation care. Implementation Science, 12(1), 143–158. https://doi.10.1186/s13012-017-0667-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of effect sizes. Psychometrica. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html
   Google Scholar
• Loy, V., Kwiatt, J., Dodda, A., Martin, E., Dua, A., & Saeian, K. (2016). Performance feedback improves compliance with quality measures. American Journal of Medical Quality, 31(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860614556089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Whitley, R., Bond, G. R., Campbell, K., Rapp, C. A., Goldman, H. H., Lutz, W. J., & Finnerty, M. T. (2007). Fidelity outcomes in the national implementing evidence-based practices project. Psychiatric Services, 58(10), 1279–1284. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.58.10.1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiel, D. E., Chamberlain, J. R., Weaver, C. M., Hall, S. E., Fordwood, S. R., & Binder, R. L. (2008). Impact of clinical training on violence risk assessment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(2), 199–200. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06081396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiel, D. E., Hung, E. K., Cramer, R. J., Hall, S. E., & Binder, R. L. (2011). An approach to evaluating competence in assessing and managing violence risk. Psychiatric Services, 62(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.62.1.pss6201_0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J. (1993). Limiting therapist exposure to Tarasoff liability: Guidelines for risk containment. American Psychologist, 48(3), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.3.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K., & Miles, H. L. (2009). The effect of training on the quality of HCR-20 violence risk assessments in forensic secure services. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(3), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940802638366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers, B. G., Desmarais, S. L., & Hanger, M. W. (2017). Measurement of change in dynamic factors using the START:AV. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2017.1317560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, P., Lindsey, S., Chatterjee, N., Rama-Iyer, R., & Picchioni, M. (2015). An audit of the quality of HCR-20 violence risk assessments in a low secure service. Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care, 11(S1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742646415000096
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. I. (2003). Commentary: Think fast, act quickly, and document (maybe). Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 31(1), 65–67. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12817845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., McLeod, B. D., Conroy, M. A., & Cox, J. R. (2013). Measuring implementation of evidence-based programs targeting young children at risk for emotional/behavioral disorders: Conceptual issues and recommendations. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113515025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Cochrane, D. M., & Jonnson, M. R. (2018). Do risk assessment tools help manage and reduce risk of reoffending? A systematic review. Law and Human Behavior, 42(3), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.1037%2Flhb0000280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Nicholls, T. L., Cruise, K. R., Desmarais, S. L., & Webster, C. D. (2016). Short-term assessment of risk and treatability: Adolescent version (START:AV) – User guide ( T. L. F. De Beuf, C., de Ruiter, & V. de Vogel, Trans.). Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University. ( Original work published 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Gershenson, B. G., & McCabe, P. (2012). Does risk assessment make a difference? Results of implementing the SAVRY in juvenile probation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30(4), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Perrault, R. T., & Gershenson, B. (2016). Risk assessment matters, but only when implemented well: A multisite study in juvenile probation. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence ( Version 2). Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D., Moline, K., Farrell, J., & Bierie, D. (2006). Best implementation practices: Disseminating new assessment technologies in a juvenile justice agency. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar