Denial in Sex Offending Treatment: Examining Criminal Career Diversity

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (1999). Dangerous sex offenders: A task force report of the American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2014). Practice guidelines for the assessment, treatment, and management of male adult sexual abusers. ATSA.
   Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L. (2012). Even highly correlated measures can add incrementally to actuarial risk prediction. Assessment, 19(4), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112458312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, A. R., Wakeling, H. C., Szumski, F., & Freemantle, N. (2016). Problems in the measurement of dynamic risk factors in sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1109095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (2004). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blagden, N., Winder, B., Gregson, M., & Thorne, K. (2011). Working with denial in convicted sexual offenders: A qualitative analysis of treatment professionals’ views and experiences and their implications for practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(3), 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11432301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, B. L., & Jeglic, E. L. (2014). Sexual offenders’ perceptions of the client–therapist relationship: The role of risk. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(4), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214529802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokland, A., & Lussier, P. (2015). Sex offenders: A criminal career approach. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, A., & van der Geest, V. (2015). Life-course transitions and desistance in sex offenders: An event history analysis. In A. Blokland & P. Lussier (Eds.), Sex offenders: A criminal career approach (pp. 257–288). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. A. (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals” (Vol. I). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brouillette-Alarie, S., Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L.-M. (2016). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114568114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canepa, M. & Merlo, S. (2010, IX ed.). Manuale di diritto penitenziario. Le norme, gli organi, le modalità dell’esecuzione delle sanzioni penali [Manual of penitentiary law. The rules, bodies, and procedures for the enforcement of criminal penalties]., Milan: Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Carabellese, F., Maniglio, R., Greco, O., & Catanesi, R. (2011). The role of fantasy in a serial sexual offender: A brief review of the literature and a case report. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(1), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01536.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1986). Research on criminal careers: Individual frequency rates and offence seriousness. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth, & C. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and career criminals (pp. 292–418). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
   Google Scholar
• Cording, J. R., Beggs, S. M. C., & Grace, R. C. (2016). Challenges for the theory and application of dynamic risk factors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1111367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelli, R., Binik, O., & Natali, L. (Forthcoming, accepted for publication). When ‘message laws’ create perpetual panic: The case of sex offender registries. Rassegna Italiana Di Criminologia [Italian Journal of Criminology].
   Google Scholar
• Craissati, J. (2015). Should we worry about sex offenders who deny their offences? Probation Journal, 62(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550515600543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craissati, J., Webb, L., & Keen, S. (2008). The relationship between developmental variables, personality disorder, and risk in sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208317464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darjee, R., & Russell, K. (2011). The assessment and sentencing of high-risk offenders in Scotland: A forensic clinical perspective. In B. McSherry & P. Kezer (Eds.), Dangerous people: Policy, prediction, and practice (pp. 217–232). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, J., Whyte, S., & Maden, T. (2008). Compulsory treatment of dangerous offenders with severe personality disorders: A comparison of the English DSPD and Dutch TBS systems. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 19(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940701830726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSorcy, D. R., Olver, M. E., & Wormith, J. S. (2016). Working alliance and its relationship with treatment outcome in a sample of aboriginal and non-aboriginal sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(4), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214556360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, H., & Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2017). Therapists’ perceptions of their encounter with sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(10), 1151–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16629972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elisha, E., Idisis, Y., & Ronel, N. (2013). Positive criminology and imprisoned sex offenders: Demonstration of a way out from a criminal spin through acceptance relationships. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2011.638145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (2003). Key results from the first 40 years of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. In T. P. Thornberry & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 137–183). Kluwer/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 10(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.349
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Freilone, F. (2011). Psicodiagnosi e disturbi di personalità. Assessment clinico e forense [Psychodiagnosis and personality disorders. Clinical and forensic assessment]. Fratelli Frilli Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (2018). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union, L. 119, 1–88. European Parliament and European Council. Available at: https://gdpr.eu/tag/gdpr/
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data from 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(10), 1046–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626002236659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K. (2014). Treating sexual offenders: How did we get here and where are we headed? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2013.861524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Bourgon, G. (2017). Advancing sexual offender risk assessment. Standardized risk levels based on psychologically meaningful offender characteristics. In F. S. Taxman (Ed.), Handbook on risk and need assessment. Theory and practice (pp. 244–291). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809338545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Letourneau, E., Helmus, L. M., & Thornton, D. (2018). Reductions in risk based on time offense-free in the community: Once a sexual offender, not always a sexual offender. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T.-L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Helmus, L., & Harris, A. J. R. (2015). Assessing the risk and needs of supervised sexual offenders: A prospective study using STABLE-2007, Static-99R, and Static-2002R. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(12), 1205–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815602094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 99-02). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, L., Beech, A. R., & Goodwill, A. M. (2010). Examining the influence of denial, motivation, and risk on sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209358106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, L., Howard, P., Barnett, G., Wakeling, H., & Miles, C. (2015). Relationships between denial, risk, and recidivism in sexual offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0333-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D., Smallbone, S., Dennison, S., & Knight, R. (2009). Specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G., Phenix, A., Hanson, R., & Thornton, D. (2003). Static-99 coding rules: Revised 2003. Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, W. P., Stone, J., Darley, J. M., & Grannemann, B. D. (2003). Yes, I did it, but don’t blame me: Perceptions of excuse defenses. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 31(2), 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/009318530303100204
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S. (2017). RNR principles in practice in the management and treatment of sexual abusers. Safer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S., & Daniels, M. (2012). Conceptualizing sex offender denial from a multifaceted framework: Investigating the psychometric qualities of a new instrument. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 33(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1874.2012.00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S., Jamieson, L., Buro, K., & DeCesare, J. (2012). Attitudes and decisions about sexual offenders: A comparison of laypersons and professionals. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S., & Nunes, K. L. (2012). Denial and its relationship with treatment perceptions among sex offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 23(4), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2012.697567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Fond, J. Q. (2005). Preventing sexual violence: How society should cope with sex offenders. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Laflen, B., & Sturm, W. (1994). Understanding and working with denial in sexual offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 3(4), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v03n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Larochelle, S., Diguer, L., Laverdière, O., Gamache, D., Greenman, P. S., & Descôteaux, J. (2010). Psychological dimensions of antisocial personality disorder as predictors of psychotherapy noncompletion among sexual offenders. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 74(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2010.74.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavarini, B., Quattrocolo, S., & Scomparin, L. (2018). La “cornice processuale” della violenza sessuale (The framework of criminal proceedings in sex violence). In G. Zara (Ed.), Denial in sex offending. From assessment to treatment (pp. 35–67). Raffaello Cortina.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D. R. (2016). Social control of sex offenders: A cultural history. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Macgowan, M. (2004). Engagement, denial, and treatment progress among sex offenders in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S. (2011). “But I didn’t do it!”: Ethical treatment of sex offenders in denial. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23(3), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210382048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Prescott, D. S. (2009). Treatment experiences of civilly committed sex offenders: A consumer satisfaction survey. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208325205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Willmot, P. (2004). The process of overcoming denial in sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600410001670937
   Google Scholar
• Lösel, F., Link, E., Schmucker, M., Bender, D., Breuer, M., Carl, L., Endres, J., & Lauchs, L. (2019). On the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment in prison: A comparison of two different evaluation designs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 32(4), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussier, P. (2005). The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: Revisiting the specialization debate. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320501700303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussier, P., & Cale, J. (2013). Beyond sexual recidivism: A review of the sexual criminal career parameters of adult sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maletzky, B. M. (1996). Denial of treatment or treatment of denial? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329600800101
   Google Scholar
• Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., Serran, G. A., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2006). Treating sexual offenders: An integrated approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCuish, E., Lussier, P., & Corrado, R. (2016). Criminal careers of juvenile sex and nonsex offenders: Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014567541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R., Cumming, G., Burchard, B., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The safer society 2009 North American survey. Safer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merlone, U., Manassero, E., & Zara, G. (2016, December 11–14). The lingering effects of past crimes over future criminal carees. In T. M. K. Roeder, P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, & S. E. Chick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Winter simulation conference (pp. 3532–3543). USA: IEEE
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Trocchio, S. (2017). Risk/Need assessment tools and the criminal justice bureaucrat. In F. S. Taxman (Ed.), Handbook on risk and need assessment. Theory and practice (pp. 378–405). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, K. L., Hanson, R. K., Firestone, P., Moulden, H. M., Greenberg, D. M., & Bradford, J. M. (2007). Denial predicts recidivism for some sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9041-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrila, J., & de Ruiter, C. (2011). The competing faces of mental health law: Recovery and access versus the expanding use of preventive confinement. Amsterdam Law Forum, 3(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.163
   Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., Jennings, W. G., Diamond, B., & Craig, J. (2012). Sex offenders and sex offending in the Cambridge study in delinquent development: Prevalence, frequency, specialization, recidivism and (dis)continuity over the lifecourse. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.688527
   Google Scholar
• Prentky, R. A., Barbaree, H. E., & Janus, E. S. (2015). Sexual predators: Society, risk, and the law. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., Yan, S., Norris, R. J., & Bushway, S. D. (2017). The Influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. H., Jackowitz, S., & Bartels, D. M. (2012). Extralegal punishment factors: A study of forgiveness, hardship, good-deeds, apology, remorse, and other such discretionary factors in assessing criminal punishment. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65, 737–826. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1798725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlank, A. M., & Shaw, T. (1997). Treating sex offenders who deny—a review. In B. K. Schwartz & H. R. Cellini (Eds.), The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations and legal developments (pp. 6.1–6.7). Civic Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. H. (2006). Personality-disordered patients. Treatable and untreatable. American Psychiatry Oublishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986204271704
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, D., & Knight, R. (2007). Is denial always bad? [Paper presentation]. The Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, S. (2008). Why should remorse be a mitigating factor in sentencing? Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-007-9044-z
   Google Scholar
• Vitiello, M. (2017). Bargained-for-justice: Lessons from the Italians? The University of the Pacific Law Review, 48, 247–263. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1298&context=facultyarticles
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2016). Dynamic risk factors: Scientific kinds or predictive constructs. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1109094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, J., & Mann, R. E. (2012). How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, P. M. (2009). Is sexual offender denial related to sex offence risk and recidivism? A review and treatment implications. Psychology Crime and Law Special Issue: Cognition and Emotion, 15(2–3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802190905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zara, G. (2018a). Il diniego nei sex offenders: Dalla valutazione al trattamento [Denial in sex offenders: From assessment to treatment]. Raffaello Cortina Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Zara, G. (2018b). Il diniego nel recidivismo sessuale. Una revisione critica della letteratura (Denial in sexual recidivism, A critical revision of the scientific literature). Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia [Italian Journal of Criminology], XI (1), 59–73. http://www.rassegnaitalianadicriminologia.it/it/component/k2/itemlist/category/55-numero-1-2018
   Google Scholar
• Zara, G. (2018c). L’impatto del diniego tra rischio di recidiva e trattamento dei reati sessuali: Il beneficio paradossale (The impact of denial upon sexual recidivism and treatment: The paradoxical benefit). Giornale Italiano di Psicologia [Italian Journal of Psychology], XLV (2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1421/90620
   Google Scholar
• Zara, G., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). Criminal recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zara, G., & Gino, S. (2018). Intimate partner violence and its escalation into femicide. Frailty thy name is ‘violence against women’. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1777), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01777
   Google Scholar
• Zara, G., & Veggi, S. (2018). I minorenni sessualmente abusanti tra solo-offending e co-offending. Uno studio esplorativo (Juvenile sex offenders between solo-offending and co-offending. An explorative study). Rassegna Italiana Di Criminologia [Italian Journal of Criminology], XII(4), 262–274. http://www.rassegnaitalianadicriminologia.it/it/component/k2/itemlist/category/58-numero-4-2018
   Google Scholar