References
- Bornstein, B. H., Golding, J. M., Neuschatz, J., Kimbrough, C., Reed, K., Magyarics, C., & Luecht, K. (2017). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000223
- Bruer, K. C., Price, H. L., & Dahl, L. C. (2017). When an alibi is not enough: Judgments of evidence needed to lay charges in a burglary case. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9209-6
- Burke, T. M., Turtle, J. W., & Olson, E. A. (2007). Alibis in criminal investigations and trials. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol I: Memory for events (pp. 157–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Charman, S., Matuku, K., & Mosser, A. (2019). The psychology of alibis. In B. H. Bornstein & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 4, pp. 41–72). Springer.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Culhane, S. E., & Hosch, H. M. (2004). An alibi witness’ influence on mock jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(8), 1604–1616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02789.x
- Culhane, S. E., & Hosch, H. M. (2012). Changed alibis: Current law enforcement, future law enforcement, and layperson reactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 958–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812438185
- Culhane, S. E., Hosch, H. M., & Kehn, A. (2008). Alibi generation: Data from U.S. hispanics and U.S. non-hispanic whites. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377930802243395
- Culhane, S. E., Kehn, A., Horgan, A. J., Meissner, C. A., Hosch, H. M., & Wodahl, E. J. (2013). Generation and detection of true and false alibi statements. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.729018
- Dahl, L. C., & Price, H. L. (2012). “He couldn’t have done it, he was with me!”: The impact of alibi witness age and relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2821
- Dysart, J. E., & Strange, D. (2012). Beliefs about alibis and alibi investigations: A survey of law enforcement. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.562867
- Eastwood, J., Snook, B., & Au, D. (2016). Safety in numbers: A policy‐capturing study of the alibi assessment process. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3200
- Fawcett, H., & Winstanley, K. (2018). Children as alibi witnesses: The effect of age and confidence on mock-juror decision making. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(6), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1482573
- Garrett, B. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press.
- Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Herscovici, B. B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim’s perceived credibility. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 1–22). Springer-Verlag.
- Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V. S., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors’ perceptions of children’s eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044837
- Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., Jolly, K. W., Chavez, R. M., & Shaw, L. H. (2011). Effects of an alibi witness’s relationship to the defendant on mock jurors’ judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 35(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5
- Innocence Canada. (2020). https://innocencecanada.com/exonerations/
- Innocence Project. (2020). https://www.innocenceproject.org/all-cases/#
- Lindsay, R. C. L., Lim, R., Marando, L., & Cully, D. (1986). Mock-juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: A test of metamemory hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(5), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01151.x
- Nieuwkamp, R., Horselenberg, R., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2017). The illusion of the perfect alibi: Establishing the base rate of non-offenders’ alibis. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1470
- Nunez, N., Kehn, A., & Wright, D. B. (2011). When children are witnesses: The effects of context, age and gender on adults’ perceptions of cognitive ability and honesty. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1713
- Olson, E. A., & Charman, S. D. (2012). ‘But can you prove it?’—Examining the quality of innocent suspects’ alibis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(5), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.505567
- Olson, E. A., & Wells, G. L. (2004). What makes a good alibi? A proposed taxonomy. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022320.47112.d3
- Price, H. L., & Dahl, L. C. (2014). Order and strength matter for evaluation of alibi and eyewitness evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2983
- Price, H. L., & Dahl, L. C. (2017). Investigator sensitivity to alibi witness inconsistency after a long delay. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 35(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2276
- Quas, J. A., Thompson, W. C., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2005). Do jurors “know” what isn’t so about child witnesses? Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 425–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-5523-8
- Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors’ perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055786
- Ross, D. F., Jurden, F. H., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Keeney, J. M. (2003). Replications and limitations of a two‐factor model of child witness credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01903.x
- Tomei, J., & Cramer, R. J. (2014). Perceived credibility of character witnesses: Implications for trial consultation. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2014.923710