The Influence of False Evidence Ploy Variants on Perceptions of Coercion and Deception

References

• Alceste, F., & Kassin, S. M. (2021). Perceptions of custody: Similarities and disparities among police, judges, social psychologists, and laypeople. Law and Human Behavior, 45(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alceste, F., Luke, T. J., Redlich, A. D., Hellgren, J., Amrom, A. D., & Kassin, S. M. (2021). The psychology of confessions: A comparison of expert and lay opinions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arizona v. Fulminate. 111 S Ct. 1246 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Blagrove, M. (1996). Effects of length of sleep deprivation on interrogative suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 48–59. http://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.2.1.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabell, J. J., Moody, S. A., & Yang, Y. (2020). Evaluating effects on guilty and innocent suspects: An effect taxonomy of interrogation techniques. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(2), 91–103. http://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.2.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo, M., Blandón-Gitlin, I., & Davis, D. (2016). The purpose, content, and effects of expert testimony on interrogations and confessions. In B. H. Bornstein & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law: Vol. 2 (pp. 141–178). Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Leo, R. A. (2012). Interrogation-related regulatory decline: Ego depletion, failures of self-regulation, and the decision to confess. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(4), 673–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, K. D., Woody, W. D., Brady, S. E., Batterman, K. C., Stastny, B. J., & Bruns, J. A. (2012). False-evidence ploys and interrogations: Mock Jurors’ perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30(3), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier v Cupp. (1969). 394 U.S. 731.
   Google Scholar
• Frenda, S. J., Berkowitz, S. R., Loftus, E. F., & Fenn, K. M. (2016). Sleep deprivation and false confessions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 2047–2050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521518113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317(5843), 1351–1354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., & Josephs, S. (2003). Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996). Psychology, Crime & Law, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316021000057631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hritz, A. C. (2017). Voluntariness with a vengeance: The coerciveness of police lies in interrogations. Cornell Law Review, 102, 487–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogations and confession (4th) ed.). Jones and Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J., Cutler, B. L., Leach, A. M., Marion, S., & Eastwood, J. (2020). Perceptions of coercion in interrogation: Comparing expert and lay opinions. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 26(4), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x2019.1669597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(2), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7(3), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meer, C. A., Rickman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A., & La Fon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9073-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Redlich, A. D., Alceste, F., & Luke, T. J. (2018). On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community. American Psychologist, 73(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp000141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the Jury: An experimental test of the “Harmless Error” rules. Law and Human Behavior, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814009769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. F., Miller, J. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kleinman, S. M. (2013). A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Weiland, P. E., & Munhall, P. J. (2002). Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.37//0021-9010.87.5.867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, G. D., Slaw, R. D., Briggs, M. A., & Scanlan, C. R. (1992). The potential for bias in videotaped confession. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(23), 1838–1851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, G. D., Ware, L. J., Lindberg, M. J., & Ratcliff, J. J. (2010). Videotaping custodial interrogations: Toward a scientifically based policy. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meer (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 143–160). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12085-009
   Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2008). Individual differences in attitudes relevant to juror decision making: Development and validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(8), 2010–2028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L. B., & Myers, B. (2009). Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 15(7), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802477757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R. (1996). Inside the Interrogation Room. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(2), 266–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R., & Drizin, S. (2008). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. In North Carolina law review (pp. 82).
   Google Scholar
• Luke, T. J., & Alceste, F. (2020). The mechanisms of minimization: How interrogation tactics suggest lenient sentencing through pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 44(4), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, S. (2022). Defining coercion: An application in interrogation and plea negotiation contexts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/law000345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, W. G., & Mullahy, J. (2001). Estimating log models: To transform or not to transform? Journal of Health Economics, 20(4), 461–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meer, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 12(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.13
   Google Scholar
• Mindthoff, A., Evans, J. R., Perez, G., Woestehoff, S. A., & Woody, W. D. (2018). A survey of potential jurors’ perceptions of interrogations and confessions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(4), 430–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofshe, R. J., & Leo, R. A. (1997). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., & Pyo, J. (2012). An explanation for camera perspective bias in involuntariness judgment for video recorded confession: Suggestion for cognitive frame. Law and Human Behavior, 36(3), 184–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perillo, J. T., & Kassin, S. M. (2011). Inside interrogation: The lie, the bluff, and false confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9244-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, J. J., Lassiter, G. D., Schmidt, H. C., & Snyder, C. J. (2006). Camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions: Experimental evidence of its perceptual basis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 12(4), 197–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russano, M. B., Meer, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, K. C., Miller, J. C., & Kassin, S. M. (2014). “Midnight confessions”: The effect of chronotype asynchrony on admissions of wrongdoing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.917974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, K. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kassin, S. M. (2020). Cumulative disadvantage: A psychological framework for understanding how innocence can lead to confession, wrongful conviction, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619896608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaker-Schroer, N., Costanzo, M., & Berger, D. E. (2015). Overlooking coerciveness: The impact of interrogation techniques and guilt corroboration on jurors’ judgments of coerciveness. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifton, J. J. (2019). How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 37(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsi.2398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, J. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 15(6), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802201827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, W. S. (1997). False confessions and the Constitution: Safeguards against untrustworthy confessions. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 32, 05–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woestehoff, S. A., & Meer, C. A. (2016). Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 564–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb000201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., & Forrest, K. (2009). Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors’ verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence. Behavioral Science and Law, 27(3), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., Forrest, K. D., & Yendra, S. (2014). Comparing the effects of explicit and implicit false-evidence ploys on mock jurors’ verdicts, sentencing recommendations, and perceptions of police interrogation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(6), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.804922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., Stewart, J. M., Forrest, K. D., Camacho, L. J., & Powner, S. J. (2018). Effects of false evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynbrandt, K. (2016). From false evidence ploy to false guilty plea: An unjustified path to securing convictions. Yale Law Journal, 126, 545–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Guyll, M., & Madon, S. (2017). The interrogation decision-making model: A general theoretical framework for confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar