Studying Confessions: A Confederate-Free, Cheating-Based Laboratory Research Paradigm

References

• Alt, D., & Geiger, B. (2012). Goal orientations and tendency to neutralize academic cheating: An ecological perspective. Psychological Studies, 57(4), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-012-0161-y
   Google Scholar
• Bain, S. A., Baxter, J. S., & Fellowes, V. (2004). Interacting influences on interrogative suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1348/1355325041719419
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, E., Deslauriers-Varin, N., & St-Yves, M. (2010). Interactions Between Factors Related to the Decision of Sex Offenders to Confess During Police Interrogation: A Classification-Tree Approach. Sexual Abuse, 22(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210370707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, L. H., Cruise, K. R., Guy, L. S., McCoy, W. K., Fernandez, K., & Ross, H. H. (2005). The influence of psychosocial maturity on male juvenile offenders’ comprehension and understanding of the Miranda warning. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33(4), 444–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers‐varin, N., Lussier, P., & St‐yves, M. (2011). Confessing their crime: Factors influencing the offender’s decision to confess to the police. Justice Quarterly, 28(1), 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903218966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, M. D., Bain, S. A., Cooke, D. J., & McCarthy, P. (2019). The role of self-esteem and locus-of-control in determining confession outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, M. D., Hillyard, S., & Macklin, A. (2022). Sexual Offending: The impact of the juxtaposition between social constructions and evidence-based approaches. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2022.2054392
   Google Scholar
• Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82(2), 891–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E., & Charlton, D. (2006). Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification, 56(4), 600–616.
   Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C., Birdsall, W. C., Henry, J., Vandervort, F., & Silverschanz, P. (2002). What makes sex offenders confess? An exploratory study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 10(4), 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, K. D., Wadkins, T. A., & Larson, B. A. (2006). Suspect personality, police interrogations, and false confessions: Maybe it is not just the situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(3), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2008). Judging innocence. Columbia Law Review, 108(1), 55–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. E. S., Condie, L., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., & Geier, J. (2003). Juvenile offenders’ Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions. Assessment, 10(4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103259535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2010). Evaluating capacity to waive Miranda rights. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. E., Haney-Caron, E., Levick, M., & Whiteman, D. (2018). Waving good-bye to waiver: A developmental argument against youths’ waiver of Miranda rights. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 21(1), 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1997). The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales manual. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., Gonzalez, R., & Young, S. (2019). The risk of making false confessions: The role of developmental disorders, conduct disorder, psychiatric symptoms, and compliance. Journal of Attention Disorders, 25(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054719833169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., & Sigurdsson, J. F. (1994). How frequently do false confessions occur? An empirical study among prison inmates. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169408411933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Bragason, O. O., Einarsson, E., & Valdimarsdottir, E. B. (2004). Confessions and denials and the relationship with personality. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532504322776898
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2009). Interrogation and false confessions among adolescents in seven European countries: What background and psychological variables best discriminate between false confessors and non-false confessors? Psychology Crime and Law, 15(8), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802516257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Sigfusdottir, I. D., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., González, R. A., & Young, S. (2016). A national epidemiological study investigating risk factors for police interrogation and false confession among juveniles and young persons. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology: The International Journal for Research in Social and Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health Services, 51(3), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1145-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyll, M., Madon, S., Yang, Y., Lannin, D. G., Scherr, K., & Greathouse, S. (2013). Innocence and resisting confession during interrogation: Effects on physiologic activity. Law and Human Behavior, 37(5), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney-Caron, E. H. (2018). True and false confessions: Comparing self-reported likelihood of confession with actual confession behavior [ Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University]. Drexel University Libraries. https://drexel.esploro.exlibrisgroup.com/esploro/outputs/doctoral/True-and-False-Confessions-Comparing-Self-Reported/991014632069904721
   Google Scholar
• Haney-Caron, E., Goldstein, N. E., & Mesiarik, C. (2018). Self-perceived likelihood of false confession: A comparison of justice-involved juveniles and adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(12), 1955–1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818799806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A. (2008). Jurors’ reactions to recanted confessions: Do the defendant’s personal and dispositional characteristics play a role? Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(6), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801995247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2020). Interviewing suspects, version 7.0. United Kingdom Home Office. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/864940/interviewing-suspects-v7.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, A. J., Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., & Evans, J. R. (2012). Minimization and maximization techniques: Assessing the perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.561801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., Smeets, T., Franssens, D., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Zeles, G. (2006). False confessions in the lab: Do plausibility and consequences matter? Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068310042000303076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbau, F., Reid, J., Buckley, J., & Jayne, B. (2011). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? The American Psychologist, 60(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2008). Confession evidence: Commonsense myths and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(10), 1309–1322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808321557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2017). False confessions: How can psychology so basic be so counterintuitive? The American Psychologist, 72(9), 951–964. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Appleby, S. C., & Perillo, J. T. (2010). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X449361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. C., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022599230598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(2), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7(3), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A. M., & La Fon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9073-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024871622490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why People Waive Their Miranda Rights: The Power of Innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022323.74584.f5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaver, J. R., Lee, Z., & Rose, V. G. (2008). Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X193051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86(2), 266–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madon, S., Guyll, M., Scherr, K. C., Greathouse, S., & Wells, G. L. (2012). Temporal discounting: The differential effect of proximal and distal consequences on confession decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024954224675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2004). You’re guilty, so just confess! In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 85–106). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_4
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C., Redlich, A., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on investigative outcomes. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.13
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camilletti, C. R., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Russano, M. B., & Narchet, F. M. (2010). The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 111–126). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12085-007
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kelly, C. E. (2018). Accusatorial and information-gathering interview and interrogation methods: A multi-country comparison. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(9), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1467909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. E., & Fitzsimmons, C. L. (2011). Justice imperiled: False confessions and the Reid technique. Criminal Law Quarterly, 57(4), 509–542.
   Google Scholar
• Narchet, F. M., Meissner, C. A., & Russano, M. B. (2011). Modeling the influence of investigator bias on the elicitation of true and false confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(6), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9257-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. A., & Wade, K. A. (2009). Innocent but proven guilty: Eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored‐video evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Registry of Exonerations. (2020). False Confession. Table: Age and mental status of exonerated defendants who falsely confess. Retrieved from https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/False-Confessions.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., Schell‐leugers, J. M., Howe, M. L., De La Fuente Vilar, A., Houben, S. T., & Merckelbach, H. (2021). The link between suggestibility, compliance, and false confessions: A review using experimental and field studies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perillo, J. T., & Kassin, S. M. (2011). Inside interrogation: The lie, the bluff, and false confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9244-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassin, E., & Israels, H. (2014). False confessions in the lab: A review. Erasmus Law Review, 7, 219–224. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000019
   Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D. (1999). False confessions: The influence of age, suggestibility, and maturity [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022543012851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., Summers, A., & Hoover, S. (2010). Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9194-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruedy, N. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2010). In the moment: The effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(S1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0796-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, S. J. (2018). Interrogated with intellectual disabilities: The risks of false confession. Stanford Law Review, 70(2), 643–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. M., Woody, W. D., & Pulos, S. (2018). The prevalence of false confessions in experimental laboratory simulations: A meta‐analysis. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence–Second Edition Manual. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Madon, S., & Guyll, M. (2015). Short-sighted confession decisions: The role of uncertain and delayed consequences. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar