Promoting inclusion, diversity, and equity in pain science

References

• Nobles M, Womack C, Wonkam A, Wathuti E. Science must overcome its racist legacy: nature’s guest editors speak. Nature. 2022;606(7913):225–11. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-01527-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher E, Oertelt-Prigione S. History and development of sex- and gender sensitive medicine (SGSM). Int Rev Neurobiol. 2022;164:1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourke J. Pain sensitivity: an unnatural history from 1800 to 1965. J Med Humanit. 2014;35(3):301–19. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9283-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Losin EAR, Ashar YK, Koban L, Wager TD. Gender biases in estimation of others’ pain. J Pain. 2021;22(9):1048–59. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD, Monrad JT, LaFrance M, Bargh JA, Cohen LL, Richeson JA. Featured article: gender bias in pediatric pain assessment. J Pediatr Psychol. 2019;44(4):403–14. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsy104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(16):4296–301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516047113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodkey EN, Pillai Riddell R. The infancy of infant pain research: the experimental origins of infant pain denial. J Pain. 2013;14(4):338–50. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.12.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho Do Nascimento PR, Ferreira ML, Poitras S, Bilodeau M. Exclusion of older adults from ongoing clinical trials on low back pain: a review of the WHO trial registry database. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(3):603–08. doi:10.1111/jgs.15684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd KH, Samaroo N, Hoffman JR, Samaroo N, Hoffman JR, Hoffman JR, Samaroo N, Hoffman JR, Hoffman JR, Hoffman JR, et al. Ethnicity as a risk factor for inadequate emergency department analgesia. JAMA. 1993;269(12):1537–39. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500120075029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janevic MR, Mathur VA, Booker SQ, Morais C, Meints SM, Yeager KA, Meghani SH. Making pain research more inclusive: why and how. J Pain. 2022;23(5):707–28. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2021.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-Elsayed A, Heyer AM, Schatman ME. Disparities in the treatment of the LGBTQ population in chronic pain management. J Pain Res. 2021;14:3623–25. doi:10.2147/JPR.S348525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood AM, Booker SQ, Morais CA, Goodin BR, Letzen JE, Campbell LC, Merriwether EN, Aroke EN, Campbell CM, Mathur VA, et al. Confronting racism in all forms of pain research: a shared commitment for engagement, diversity, and dissemination. J Pain. 2022;23(6):913–28. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letzen JE, Mathur VA, Janevic MR, Burton MD, Hood AM, Morais CA, Booker SQ, Campbell CM, Aroke EN, Goodin BR, et al. Confronting racism in all forms of pain research: reframing study designs. J Pain. 2022;23(6):893–912. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais CA, Aroke EN, Letzen JE, Campbell CM, Hood AM, Janevic MR, Mathur VA, Merriwether EN, Goodin BR, Booker SQ, et al. Confronting racism in pain research: a call to action. J Pain. 2022;23(6):878–92. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan NT, Perez M, Prinstein MJ, Thurston IB. Upending racism in psychological science: strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. Am Psychol. 2021;76(7):1097–112. doi:10.1037/amp0000905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin JD, Linn KA, Teich EG, Zurn P, Shinohara RT, Bassett DS. The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(8):918–26. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postle BR, Fulvio JM. One-year update from the editor-in-chief. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021;34(1):1–3. doi:10.1162/jocn_e_01799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster A, Hindle S, Murphy KM, Saderi D. Open reviewers bias reflection guide. Zenodo; 2021 [ Accessed 2022 September 4].https://zenodo.org/record/5484052#.Y3BDP-zML1I.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society of Chemistry. 2022. Joint commitment for action on inclusion and diversity in publishing. [ Accessed 2022 October 8]. https://www.rsc.org/new-perspectives/talent/joint-commitment-for-action-inclusion-and-diversity-in-publishing/
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Inclusive language guidelines. 2021 [ Accessed 2022 September 4]. https://www.apa.org/about/apa/equitydiversity-inclusion/language-guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. 2022 [ Accessed 2022 October 8]. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations
   Google Scholar
• Frey T, Young RK. Correct and preferred usage. In: AMA manual of style: a guide for authors and editors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2020. p. 505–50.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Berkley KJ, Fillingim RB, Gold MS, Holdcroft A, Lautenbacher S, Mayer EA, et al. Consensus working group of the sex G, pain SIGotI: studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain. 2007;132(Suppl 1):S26–S45. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:2.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute of Health Research. How to integrate sex and gender into research. 2022 [ Accessed 2022 October 28]. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/50836.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(1):52–58. doi:10.1093/bja/aet127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley RW, Adams MC. Sex, gender, and pain: an overview of a complex field. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):309–17. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0b013e31816ba437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogil JS. Qualitative sex differences in pain processing: emerging evidence of a biased literature. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21(7):353–65. doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0310-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maney DL. Perils and pitfalls of reporting sex differences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371:20150119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyrup A, Graves JL. Racial biology and medical misconceptions. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(6):501–03. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2116224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS, Malina D. Hidden in plain sight — reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(9):874–82. doi:10.1056/NEJMms2004740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne NR, Davis KD. Sex and gender differences in pain. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2022;164:277–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL. AMA manual of style committee: updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. JAMA. 2021;326(7):621–27. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.13304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar