Citizenship from below: exploring subjective perspectives on German citizenship

References

• Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. 2010. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Z. Papacharissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braw, E. 2020. “Ask What You Can Do for Your Country.” Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/04/national-service-germany-usa-ask-what-you-can-do-for-your-country/ in 10/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, A. 2001. The Political Theory of Global Citizenship. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dagger, R. 2002. “Republican Citizenship.” In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, edited by E. F. Isin, and B. S. Turner, 145–157. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C., and C. Michelle. 2011. “Q Methodology in Audience Research: Bridging the Qualitative/Quantitative ‘Divide’.” Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 8 (2): 559–593.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, C., and I. Tucci. 2011. “Fremdenfeindlichkeit und Einstellungen zur Einbürgerung.” DIW Wochenbericht 78 (1): 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Duchesne, S. 2003. “French Representations of Citizenship and Immigrants: The Political Dimension of the Civic Link.” Immigrants and Minorities 22 (2–3): 262–279.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, L. 2017. “Anti-Cosmopolitanism and the Motivational Preconditions for Social Justice.” Social Theory and Practice 43 (2): 249–282.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 2015. “Communitarianism.” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, edited by M. T. Gibbons, 1–5. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fontein-Kuipers, Y. 2016. “Development of a Concourse for a Q-Method Study about Midwives’ Perspectives of Woman-Centered Care.” Health Education and Care 1 (2): 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. 1996. Kontexte der Gerechtigkeit – Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und Kommunitarismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concpets.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. 2002. Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. 2016. “From Data Analytics to Data Hermeneutics. Online Political Discussions, Digital Methods and the Continuing Relevance of Interpretive Approaches.” Digital Culture & Society 2 (2): 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Grégoire, J.-F. 2014. “Beyond the Liberal Route to Federalism: Republican Freedom.” Theoria 61 (138): 18–36.
   Google Scholar
• Helbling, M., and C. Teney. 2015. “The Cosmopolitan Elite in Germany: Transnationalism and Postmaterialism.” Global Networks 15 (4): 446–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylton, P., B. Kisby, and P. Goddard. 2018. “Young People’s Citizen Identities: A Q-Methodological Analysis of English Youth Perceptions of Citizenship in Britain.” Societies 8 (4): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F., and P. Nyers. 2014. “Introduction. Globalizing Citizenship Studies.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies, edited by E. F. Isin, and P. Nyers, 1–12. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F., and M. Saward. 2011. “Questions of European Citizenship.” In Enacting European Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and M. Saward, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. 2005. “Economic Constitutionalism, Liberalism and the New Welfare Governance.” Asia Research Centre Working Paper, 121.
   Google Scholar
• Kalu, K. N. 2003. “Of Citizenship, Virtue, and the Administrative Imperative: Deconstructing Aristotelian Civic Republicanism.” Public Administration Review 63 (4): 418–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiwan, D. 2012. “Human Rights and Citizenship Education: Re-positioning the Debate.” Cambridge Journal of Education 42 (1): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühler, M., and N. Jelinek. 2010. “Autonomy and the Self.” Preprints of the Centre for Advanced Study in Bioethics, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, K. H., C. C. Bang, M. Egnoto, and H. Raghav Rao. 2016. “Social Media Rumors as Improvised Public Opinion: Semantic Network Analyses of Twitter Discourses During Korean Saber Rattling 2013.” Asian Journal of Communication 26 (3): 201–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstam, E., M. Mader, and H. Schoen. 2019. “Conceptions of National Identity and Ambivalence Towards Immigration.” British Journal of Political Science, published online before print, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. 1997. “Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis.” Feminist Review 57: 28–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. 2010. “Republican Global Distributive Justice.” DiaCrítica. Série Filosofia e Cultura 24 (2): 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mader, M. 2016. “Stabilität und Wandel der nationalen Identität in der deutschen Bevölkerung.” Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 68 (3): 435–456.
   Google Scholar
• Maireder, A., and J. Ausserhofer. 2014. “Political Discourses on Twitter: Networking Topics, Objects and People.” In Twitter and Society, edited by K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, and C. Puschmann, 305–318. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Idriss, C. 2006. “Everyday Understandings of Citizenship in Germany.” Citizenship Studies 10 (5): 541–570.
   Google Scholar
• Nikraftar, T., and R. Shokri. 2014. “Dominant Concourse about Important Barriers to Promoting Coordination in Iranian Government Machinery.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 8 (3): 357–373.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, B. 2016. A New Politics of Identity. Political Principles for an Interdependent World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Partheymüller, J., and T. Faas. 2015. “The Impact of Online Versus Offline Campaign Information on Citizens’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Political Behaviour Comparing the German Federal Elections of 2005 and 2009.” German Politics 24 (4): 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pautz, H. 2005. “The Politics of Identity in Germany: The Leitkultur Debate.” Race & Class 46 (4): 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, D., V. Kraak, C. McCullum, U. Uusitalo, and R. Rich. 1999. “The Shaping of Collective Values Through Deliberative Democracy: An Empirical Study from New York’s North Country.” Policy Sciences 32 (2): 103–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2013. “Two Republican Traditions.” In Republican Democracy, edited by A. Niederberger and P. Schink, 169–204. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeskens, T., and M. Hooghe. 2010. “Beyond the Civic-Ethnic Dichotomy: Investigating the Structure of Citizenship Concepts across Thirty-Three Countries.” Nations and Nationalism 16 (4): 579–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiner, T. 2011. “The Sources of Communitarianism on the American Left: Pluralism, Republicanism, and Participatory Democracy.” History of European Ideas 37 (3): 293–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. 1999. “Liberalism and Republicanism: Friends or Foes? A Reply to Richard Dagger.” Review of Politics 61 (2): 209–214.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. 1995. “Thinking About Community: Ten Theses.” Society 32 (5): 33–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, R. 2012. “Republicanism and Liberalism in the Current Theoretical Debate.” 22o World Congress of Political Science IPSA, Panel on Dialogues between Political Liberalism and Republicanism, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sneegas, G. 2020. “Making the Case for Critical Q Methodology.” Professional Geographer 72 (1): 78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. 1986. “The Concourse Theory of Communication.” Operant Subjectivity 9 (2): 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, N. 1997. “Globalization, National Cultures and Cultural Citizenship.” Sociological Quarterly 38 (1): 41–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, N. 2003. Cultural Citizenship. Cosmopolitan Questions. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1994. Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theiss-Morse, E. 1993. “Conceptualizations of Good Citizenship and Political Participation.” Political Behavior 15 (4): 355–380.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. J. 2017. “Autonomy and Common Good: Interpreting Rousseau’s General Will.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (2): 266–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, J. 2000. “Struggles Over Recognition and Distribution.” Constellations 7 (4): 469–482.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J. 2014. On Global Citizenship. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 1993. “Contemporary Problems in the Theory of Citizenship.” In Citizenship and Social Theory, edited by B. S. Turner, 1–18. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Exel, J., and G. de Graaf. 2005. Q methodology: A Sneak Preview. www.jobvanexel.nl in 04/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. M. 1999. “How Hegel Reconciles Private Freedom with Citizenship.” Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (4): 419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallaschek, S. 2020. “The Discursive Construction of Solidarity: Analysing Public Claims in Europe’s Migration Crisis.” Political Studies 68 (1): 74–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S., and P. Stenner. 2014. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., J. Citrin, and J. Wand. 2012. “Alternative Measures of American National Identity: Implications for the Civic-Ethnic Distinction.” Political Psychology 33 (4): 469–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A. 2014. “Qmethod: A Package to Explore Human Perspectives Using Q Methodology.” R Journal 6 (2): 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A., C. Sandbrook, and N. Mukherjee. 2018. “When and How to Use Q Methodology to Understand Perspectives in Conservation Research.” Conservation Biology 32 (5): 1185–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckert, M. P. 2007. “On Constitutional Welfare Liberalism: An Old-Liberal Perspective.” Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1): 266–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar