The lure of populism: a conjoint experiment examining the interplay between demand and supply side factors

References

• Brambor, T., W. R. Clark, and M. Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82. doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenstein, S. 2019. “Choosing the Crook: A Conjoint Experiment on Voting for Corrupt Politicians.” Research & Politics 6 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1177/2053168019832230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S., T. Järvi, M. Mattila, and Å. von Schoultz. 2021. “How Voters Choose one out of Many: A Conjoint Analysis of the Effects of Endorsements on Candidate Choice.” Political Research Exchange 3 (1): Article 1892456. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2021.1892456.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S., M. S. L. Rosa, and K. Grönlund. 2020. “How Candidate Characteristics Affect Favorability in European Parliament Elections: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in Finland.” European Union Politics 21 (3): 519–540. doi:10.1177/1465116520929765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foa, R. S., A. Klassen, M. Slade, A. Rand, and R. Collins. 2020. The Global Satisfaction with Democracy Report 2020. Cambridge: Centre for the Future of Democracy. Accessed 5 January 2022. https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/global-satisfaction-democracy-report-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Foa, R. S., and Y. Mounk. 2019. “Youth and the Populist Wave.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 45 (9–10): 1013–1024. doi:10.1177/0191453719872314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurkink, B., A. Zaslove, R. Sluiter, and K. Jacobs. 2020. “Populist Attitudes, Political Trust, and External Political Efficacy: Old Wine in New Bottles?” Political Studies 68 (1): 247–267. doi:10.1177/0032321719842768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, E., T. Schwarzbözl, and M. Fatke. 2019. “Politicizing Immigration in Western Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (10): 1444–1463. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1531909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., D. Kronick, M. Levendusky, and M. Meredith. 2021. “The Majoritarian Threat to Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1–10. doi:10.1017/XPS.2020.44.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., D. Hangartner, and T. Yamamoto. 2015. “Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments Against Real-World Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (8): 2395–2400. doi:10.1073/pnas.1416587112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., D. J. Hopkins, and T. Yamamoto. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22 (01): 1–30. doi:10.1093/pan/mpt024.
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Y., Z. Markovich, and T. Yamamoto. 2021. “Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?” Political Analysis, 1–15. doi:10.1017/pan.2021.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., and H. Kriesi. 2022. “Politicising Immigration in Times of Crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (2): 341–365. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iakhnis, E., B. Rathbun, J. Reifler, and T.J. Scotto. 2018. “Populist Referendum: Was ‘Brexit’ an Expression of Nativist and Anti-Elitist Sentiment?” Research & Politics 5: 2. doi:10.1177/2053168018773964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignazi, P. 1992. “The Silent Counter-Revolution.” European Journal of Political Research 22 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00303.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization : Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, B. 2014. “Plotting Regression Coefficients and Other Estimates.” The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata 14 (4): 708–737. doi:10.1177/1536867X1401400402.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. R., and S. M. Van Hauwaert. 2020. “The populist citizen: Empirical evidence from Europe and Latin America.” European Political Science Review 12 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1017/S1755773919000262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, L. 2014. Parties, Governments and Voters in Finland: Politics Under Fundamental Societal Transformation. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kessel, S. v. 2013. “A Matter of Supply and Demand: The Electoral Performance of Populist Parties in Three European Countries.” Government and Opposition 48 (2): 175–199. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kestilä-Kekkonen, E., and P. Söderlund. 2014. “Party, Leader or Candidate? Dissecting the Right-Wing Populist Vote in Finland.” European Political Science Review 6 (04): 1–22. doi:10.1017/S1755773913000283.
   Google Scholar
• Kestilä, E. 2006. “Is There Demand for Radical Right Populism in the Finnish Electorate?” Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (3): 169–191. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00148.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, P. A., and A. Coppock. 2018. “Candidate Choice Without Party Labels.” Political Behavior 40 (3): 571–591. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9414-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 2002. “Popular Dissatisfaction with Democracy: Populism and Party Systems.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Y. Mény and Y. Surel, 179–196. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Accessed 4 April 2022. doi:10.1057/9781403920072_10.
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, T. J., S. B. Hobolt, and J. Tilley. 2020. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis 28 (2): 207–221. doi:10.1017/pan.2019.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukac, M., and A. Stefanelli. 2020. Conjoint Experiments: Power Analysis Tool. Accessed 4 January 2022. https://mblukac.shinyapps.io/conjoints-power-shiny/
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, P. 2019. “Variation in Policy Success: Radical Right Populism and Migration Policy.” West European Politics 42 (3): 517–544. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1504509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, M. J., and A. Zaslove. 2021. “Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach.” Comparative Political Studies 54 (2): 372–407. doi:10.1177/0010414020938081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, E., D. Garzia, F. da Silva F, and A. De Angelis. 2020. “Leader Effects and Voting for the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe.” Swiss Political Science Review 26 (3): 273–295. doi:10.1111/spsr.12404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save it. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542–563. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2017. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by R. K. Cristóbal, P. Taggart, and P. O. Espejo, 27–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuner, F. G., and C. Wratil. 2020. “The Populist Marketplace: Unpacking the Role of “Thin” and “Thick” Ideology.” Political Behavior, doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09629-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2019. Cultural Backlash Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Authoritarian Populism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. 2008. “Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland.” International Political Science Review 29 (3): 349–373. doi:10.1177/0192512107088390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osuna, J. J. O. 2020. “From Chasing Populists to Deconstructing Populism: A New Multidimensional Approach to Understanding and Comparing Populism.” European Journal of Political Research, doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, J., J. Rovny, R. Bakker, E. Edwards, L. Hooghe, S. Jolly, J. Koedan, et al. 2017. “Explaining the Salience of Anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data.” Research & Politics 4: 1. doi:10.1177/2053168016686915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira Kaltwasser, C., and S. M. Van Hauwaert. 2020. “The Populist Citizen: Empirical Evidence from Europe and Latin America.” European Political Science Review 12 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1017/S1755773919000262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, J. 2008. “Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes or Racists? Radical Right-Wing Voting in Six West European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (6): 737–765. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00784.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen, I. A.-L., and H. S. Christensen. 2022. “Guardians of Democracy or Passive Bystanders? A Conjoint Experiment on Elite Transgressions of Democratic Norms.” Political Research Quarterly. Online First, doi:10.1177/10659129211073592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., and J. Matthes. 2015. “How Anti-Immigrant Right-Wing Populist Advertisements Affect Young Voters: Symbolic Threats, Economic Threats and the Moderating Role of Education.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (10): 1577–1599. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2014.981513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon, I., and J. Bynner. 2019. “Young People and the Great Recession: Variations in the School-to-Work Transition in Europe and the United States.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 10 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1332/175795919X15514456677349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruyt, B., G. Keppens, and F. Van Droogenbroeck. 2016. “Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It?” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 335–346. doi:10.1177/1065912916639138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanelli, A., and M. Lukac. 2020. Subjects, Trials, and Levels: Statistical Power in Conjoint Experiments. 18 November. SocArXiv. Accessed 6 April 2022. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/spkcy/
   Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. W. 2020. “When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1561/100.00018132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogd, R., and R. Dassonneville. 2020. “Are the Supporters of Populist Parties Loyal Voters? Dissatisfaction and Stable Voting for Populist Parties.” Government and Opposition 55 (3): 349–370. doi:10.1017/gov.2018.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westinen, J., V. Pitkänen, and E. Kestilä-Kekkonen. 2020. “Perussuomalaisten äänestäjäkunnan muutos 2011–2019.” In Politiikan Ilmastonmuutos – Eduskuntavaalitutkimus 2019, edited by S. Borg, E. Kestilä-Kekkonen, and H. Wass, 308–332. Helsinki: Oikeusministeriön julkaisuja.
   Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A., C. Schimpf, and H. Schoen. 2020. “When the Whole is Greater than the Sum of its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 356–374. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagórski, P., J. Rama, and G. Cordero. 2021. “Young and Temporary: Youth Employment Insecurity and Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Europe.” Government and Opposition 56 (3): 405–426. doi:10.1017/gov.2019.28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar