Perceptions of polarization among political representatives

References

• Abramowitz, A. I., and K. L. Saunders. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–555. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, A. I., and S. W. Webster. 2018. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans.” Political Psychology 39 (suppl. 1): 119–135. doi:10.1111/pops.12479
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J., and S. Merrill, III. 2009. “Policy-seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation: A Valence-Uncertainty Model.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 539–558. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and Y. V. Tverdova. 2001. “Winners, Losers, and Attitudes About Government in Contemporary Democracies.” International Political Science Review 22 (4): 321–338. doi:10.1177/0192512101022004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H. 2003. Explaining Coalitions. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., C. De Vries, E. Edwards, L. Hooghe, S. Jolly, G. Marks, J. Polk, J. Rovny, M. Steenbergen, and M. A. Vachudova. 2015. “Measuring Party Positions in Europe The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File 1999–2010.” Party Politics 21 (1): 143–152. doi:10.1177/1354068812462931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balliet, D., and P. A. M. Van Lange. 2013. “Trust, Conflict, and Cooperation: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 139 (5): 1090–1112. doi:10.1037/a0030939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., N. Y. Daniel. 2009. “Using Empathy to Improve Intergroup Attitudes and Relations.” Social Issues and Policy Review 3 (1): 141–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and F. Gélineau. 2007. “Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Studies 55 (2): 425–441. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., T. Donovan, and J. A. Karp. 2006. “Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology?” The Journal of Politics 68: 434–446. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, R. E., and G. J. Love. 2018. “Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 115–139. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J. 1984. “The Influence of Group Identifications on Political Perception and Evaluation.” The Journal of Politics 46 (3): 760–785. doi:10.2307/2130855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Swaan, A., and A. Rapoport. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. 1958. “Trust and Suspicion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2 (4): 265–279. doi:10.1177/002200275800200401
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, C. E., S. B. Hobolt, and J. Tilley. 2018. “Facing up to the Facts: What Causes Economic Perceptions?” Electoral Studies 51: 115–122. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C., and K. van Kersbergen. 2007. “Interest, Identity and Political Allegiance in the European Union.” Acta Politica 42: 307–328. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., J. Evans, and B. Bryson. 1996. “Have Americans’ Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?” American Journal of Sociology 102 (3): 690–755. doi:10.1086/230995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., and M. T. Armaly. 2019. “The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarization.” Political Behavior 41 (3): 815–839. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9476-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., M. Gilljam, and D. Karlsson. 2013. “Sources of Elite Democratic Satisfaction: How Elected Representatives Evaluate Their Political System.” In Stepping Stones. Research on Political Representation, Voting Behavior, and Quality of Government, edited by S. Dahlberg, H. Oscarsson, and L. Wängnerud, 39–58. Gothenburg: Department of Political Science. University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Gilljam, M., and D. Karlsson. 2015. “Ruling Majority and Opposition: How Parliamentary Position Affects the Attitudes of Political Representatives.” Parliamentary Affairs 68 (3): 555–572. doi:10.1093/pa/gsu007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, B., and R. Weissberg. 1978. “Elections and the Mobilization of Popular Support.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (1): 31–55. doi:10.2307/2110668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., B. Palmquist, and E. Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, S. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Political Identification.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (1): 136–153. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501010.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutsell, J. N., and M. Inzlicht. 2012. “Intergroup Differences in the Sharing of Emotive States: Neural Evidence of an Empathy Gap.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7 (5): 596–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, J. J., and L. J. Sharpe, eds. 1991. Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. 2009. “Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 413–448. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S. 1999. “Down and Down We Go: Political Trust in Sweden.” In Critical Citizens, edited by P. Norris, 103–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., and M. Okolikj. 2020. “The Long-term Effects of the Economic Crisis on Political Trust in Europe: Is there a Negativity Bias in the Relation Between Economic Performance and Political Support?” Comparative European Politics 18: 879–898. doi:10.1057/s41295-020-00214-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. 2003. “Group Identity and Political Cohesion.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis, 511–558. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., G. Sood, and Y. Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. 2017. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, D. 2017. “Inter-level Trust in a Multilevel Political System.” Scandinavian Political Studies 40 (3): 289–311. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, D., and M. Gilljam. 2014. Svenska politiker: om de folkvalda i riksdag, landsting och kommun. Stockholm: Santérus.
   Google Scholar
• Kernell, G., and K. J. Mullinix. 2019. “Winners, Losers, and Perceptions of Vote (Mis)Counting.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 31 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edx021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klok, P.-J., and B. Denters. 2013. “The Roles Councillors Play.” In Local Councillors in Europe, edited by B. Egner, D. Sweeting, and P.-J. Klok, 63–83. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lantto, J. 2005. Konflikt eller samförstånd? [Conflict or consensus?]. Stockholm: Akademitryck AB.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., F. Lopes-de Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1997. “Trust in Large Organizations.” The American Economic Review 87 (2): 333–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., and B. B. Bunker. 1996. “Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships.” In Trust in Organizations, edited by R. M. Kramer, and T. R. Tyler, 114–139. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., R. Nadeau, and A. Elias. 2008. “Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 84–95. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedman, S.-E. 2012. Från Platon till kriget mot terrorismen [From Plato to the War on Terror]. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J., F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström (eds.). 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, L. 1974. “On Being a Sore Loser: How Fans React to Their Team's Failure.” Australian Journal of Psychology 26 (1): 37–47. doi:10.1080/00049537408254634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. 2015. ““I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–145. doi:10.1111/ajps.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., L. L. Cummings, and N. L. Chervany. 1998. “Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 473–490. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. 2007. “Social and Political Trust.” In The Oxford Handbook Political Behaviour, edited by R. J. D. Dalton, and H. D. Klingemann, 342–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norén Bretzer, Y. 2005. Att förklara politiskt förtroende. Göteborg: Grafikerna i Kungälv.
   Google Scholar
• Okolikj, M., and M. Hooghe. 2022. “Is There a Partisan Bias in the Perception of the State of the Economy? A Comparative Investigation of European Countries, 2002–2016.” International Political Science Review 43 (2): 240–258. doi:10.1177/0192512120915907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarsson, H., T. Bergman, A. Bergström, and J. Hellström. 2021. Demokratirådets rapport 2021: polariseringen i Sverige. [The Democracy Council's Report 2021 Polarisation in Sweden]. SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton university press.
   Google Scholar
• Riek, B. M., E. W. Mania, and S. L. Gaertner. 2006. “Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-analytic Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (4): 336–353. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. L. 1996. “Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (4): 574–599. doi:10.2307/2393868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simas, E. N., S. Clifford, and J. H. Kirkland. 2020. “How Empathic Concern Fuels Political Polarization.” American Political Science Review 11 (1): 258–269.
   Google Scholar
• Skoog, L. 2019. Political Conflicts – Dissent and Antagonism among Political Parties in Local Government. Göteborg: Brandfactory.
   Google Scholar
• Skoog, L. 2021. “Where Did the Party Conflicts Go? How Horizontal Specialization in Political Systems Affects Party Conflicts.” Politics & Policy 49 (2): 390–413. doi:10.1111/polp.12397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoog, L., and D. Karlsson. 2018. “Causes of Party Conflicts in Local Politics.” Politics 38 (2): 182–196. doi:10.1177/0263395716678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. 2000. “Producing and Consuming Trust.” Political Science Quarterly 115 (4): 569–590. doi:10.2307/2657610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. New York: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., L. Van Boven, J. R. Chambers, and C. M. Judd. 2015. “Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States: Party Identity Strength and Attitude Extremity Exacerbate the Perceived Partisan Divide.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10 (2): 145–158. doi:10.1177/1745691615569849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar