Virtuous people and evil elites? The role of moralizing frames and normative distinctions in identifying populist discourse

References

• Adcock, R., and D. Collier. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” The American Political Science Review 95 (3): 529–546. doi:10.1017/S0003055401003100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, and A. Zaslove. 2014. “How Populist are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1324–1353. doi:10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armony, A. C., and V. Armony. 2005. “Indictments, Myths, and Citizen Mobilization in Argentina: A Discourse Analysis.” Latin American Politics & Society 47 (4): 27–54. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2005.tb00327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K. 2009. “Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980-2002.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 259–275. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. 2016. “Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a new Perspective.” Political Studies 64(1_suppl): 88–104. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. 2017. “Measuring Populist Discourse with Semantic Text Analysis: An Application on Grassroots Populist Mobilization.” Quality & Quantity 52: 1241–1263.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., M. Rooduijn, and G. Schumacher. 2016. “The Psychological Roots of Populist Voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 302–320. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., K. Watanabe, H. Wang, P. Nulty, A. Obeng, S. Müller, A. Matsuo, et al. 2018. “Quanteda: An r Package for the Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data.” Journal of Open Source Software 3 (30): 774. doi:10.21105/joss.00774
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, L., and H. Kriesi. 2019. “Populism in Election Times: A Comparative Analysis of 11 Countries in Western Europe.” West European Politics 42 (6): 1188–1208. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1596694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, L., H. Kriesi, and E. Weber. 2015. “The Populist Discourse of the Swiss People’s Party.” In European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, edited by H. Kriesi, and T. S. Pappas, 125–139. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., and N. Gidron. 2016. “The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential Campaign Rhetoric, 1952-1996.” Social Forces 94 (4): 1593–1621. doi:10.1093/sf/sov120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., and N. Gidron. 2018. “Populism in Legislative Discourse: Evidence from the European Parliament, 1999-2004.” Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., D. Halikiopoulou, E. Kaufmann, and M. Rooduijn. 2019. “Populism and Nationalism in a Comparative Perspective: A Scholarly Exchange.” Nations and Nationalism 25 (1): 58–81. doi:10.1111/nana.12480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., Y. Luo, and O. Stuhler. 2022. “Politics as Usual? Measuring Populism, Nationalism, and Authoritarianism in U.S. Presidential Campaigns (1952–2020) with Neural Language Models.” Sociological Methods & Research 51 (4): 1721–1787. doi:10.1177/00491241221122317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, N. 2015. “The Roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and Their Implications for the EU.” International Political Science Review 36 (3): 337–350. doi:10.1177/0192512115571590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breyer, M. 2022. “Populist Positions in Party Competition: Do Parties Strategically Vary Their Degree of Populism in Reaction to Vote and Office Loss?” Party Politics 29 (4): 672–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2017a. “Why Populism?” Theory and Society 46 (5): 357–385. doi:10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2017b. “Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (8): 1191–1226. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1294700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiani, M., and D. della Porta. 2011. “The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right: A Frame Analysis of Extreme Right-Wing Discourses in Italy and Germany.” Acta Politica 46 (2): 180–202. doi:10.1057/ap.2010.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammack, P. 2000. “The Resurgence of Populism in Latin America.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 19 (2): 159–161. doi:10.1111/j.1470-9856.2000.tb00096.x
   Google Scholar
• Celico, A., M. Rode, and I. Rodriguez-Carreño. 2024. “Will the Real Populists Please Stand up? A Machine Learning Index of Party Populism.” European Journal of Political Economy 82: 102529. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer, M. 2011. “Populist Communication and Publicity: An Empirical Study of Contextual Differences in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 17 (3): 286–307. doi:10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J., and D. Greene. 2016. “Replication Data for: Exploring the Political Agenda of the European Parliament Using a Dynamic Topic Modeling Approach.” Havard Dataverse 25 (1): 77–94. doi:10.7910/DVN/LVHLZK
   Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K., and T. Haughton. 2009. “Toward a More Useful Conceptualization of Populism: Types and Degrees of Populist Appeals in the Case of Slovakia.” Politics & Policy 37 (4): 821–841. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00200.x
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, C. 2000. Populist Seduction in Latin America: The Ecuadorian Experience. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cocco, J., and B. Monechi. 2022. “How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning.” Political Analysis 30 (3): 311–327. doi:10.1017/pan.2021.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, H., and P. Manow. 2016. Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development Version.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. 2015. “Preference for Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties among Exclusive-Nationalists and Authoritarians.” Party Politics 21 (3): 367–380. doi:10.1177/1354068812472587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elchardus, M., and B. Spruyt. 2016. “Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology.” Government and Opposition 51 (1): 111–133. doi:10.1017/gov.2014.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., N. Ernst, F. Esser, and F. Büchel. 2017. “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (8): 1109–1126. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhard, L., S. Hanke, U. Remer, A. Falenska, and R. Heiberger. 2023. PopBERT. Detecting populism and its host ideologies in the German Bundestag. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.14355.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., S. Blassnig, S. Engesser, F. Büchel, and F. Esser. 2019. “Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements Across six Countries.” Social Media + Society 5 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1177/2056305118823358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., S. Engesser, F. Büchel, S. Blassnig, and F. Esser. 2017. “Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Across six Countries.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1347–1364. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2012. Amendment of Rule 181 on Verbatim Reports and Rule 182 on Audiovisual Record of Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H., and N. Groot. 2014. “Populism in the European Parliament: What Implications for the Open Society?” The International Spectator 49 (4): 33–46. doi:10.1080/03932729.2014.961768
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., J. Haidt, and B. A. Nosek. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5): 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, D., and J. Cross. 2017. “Exploring the Political Agenda of the European Parliament Using a Dynamic Topic Modeling Approach.” Political Analysis 25(1): 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., and B. M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297. doi:10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gründl, J. 2022. “Populist Ideas on Social Media: A Dictionary-Based Measurement of Populist Communication.” New Media & Society 24 (6): 1481–1499. doi:10.1177/1461444820976970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., and J. Graham. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions That Liberals may not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 20 (1): 98–116. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., and C. Joseph. 2005. “The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules.” In The Innate Mind, edited by P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. P. Stich, 367–391. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., L. Bos, and C. H. de Vreese. 2017. “They did it”: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication.” Communication Research 44 (6): 870–900. doi:10.1177/0093650216644026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., and R. Vliegenthart. 2019. “The Rise of a Populist Zeitgeist? A Content Analysis of Populist Media Coverage in Newspapers Published Between 1990 and 2017.” Journalism Studies 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. 2009. “Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. 2010. Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. “What the (Ideational) Study of Populism Can Teach us, and What it Can’t.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 526–542. doi:10.1111/spsr.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger, S., and F. Paxton. 2022. “What’s in a Buzzword? A Systematic Review of the State of Populism Research in Political Science.” Political Science Research and Methods 10 (3): 617–633. doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, M., and R. Huber. 2023. “When Correlation is not Enough: Validating Populism Scores from Supervised Machine-Learning Models.” Political Analysis 31 (4): 591–605. doi:10.1017/pan.2022.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. 1992. “The Politics of Abstractions: Instrumental and Moralist Rhetorics in Public Debate.” Social Research 59 (2): 315–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J.-H. 2019. “The Mobilizing Effect of Parties’ Moral Rhetoric.” American Journal of Political Science 64 (2): 341–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., and C. Miller. 2021. “Party Politics and Radical Right Populism in the European Parliament: Analysing Political Groups as Democratic Actors.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (4): 782–801. doi:10.1111/jcms.13181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. 2014. “The Populist Challenge.” West European Politics 37 (2): 361–378. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., and J. Garry. 2000. “Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 619–634. doi:10.2307/2669268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, P., S. Franzmann, T. Burst, S. Regel, F. Riethmüller, A. Volkens, B. Bernhard, and L. Zehnter. 2023. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR) . Version 2023a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) / Göttingen: Institut für Demokratieforschung (IfDem).
   Google Scholar
• Levick, L., and M. Olavarria-Gambi. 2020. “Hindsight Bias in Expert Surveys: How Democratic Crises Influence Retrospective Evaluations.” Politics 40 (4): 494–509. doi:10.1177/0263395720914571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manucci, L., and E. Weber. 2017. “Why the big Picture Matters: Political and Media Populism in Western Europe Since the 1970s.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 313–334. doi:10.1111/spsr.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. 2017. “Left and Right Populism Compared: The British Case.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (2): 282–303. doi:10.1177/1369148117701753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, M. J., and A. Zaslove. 2021. “Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a new Approach.” Comparative Political Studies 54 (2): 372–407. doi:10.1177/0010414020938081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., and Y. Surel. 2000. Par le Peuple, Pour le Peuple: Le Populisme et les Démocraties. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Meny, Y., and Y. Surel. 2002. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Y. Meny, and Y. Surel, 1–21. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2017. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, and P. Ostiguy, 28–47. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2018. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667–1693. doi:10.1177/0010414018789490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2017. What is Populism?. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Narotzky, S. 2016. “Between Inequality and Injustice: Dignity as a Motive for Mobilization During the Crisis.” History and Anthropology 27 (1): 74–92. doi:10.1080/02757206.2015.1111209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., and W. M. Rahn. 2016. “Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667 (1): 189–206. doi:10.1177/0002716216662639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panizza, F. 2005. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, T. 2011. “Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21 (1): 97–119. doi:10.1080/17457289.2011.539483
   Google Scholar
• Reungoat, E. 2010. “Anti-EU Parties and the People: An Analysis of Populism in French Euromanifestos.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 11 (3): 292–312. doi:10.1080/15705854.2010.503034
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. 2015. “The Rise of the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe.” European View 14 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1007/s12290-015-0347-5
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. 2019. “State of the Field: How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics? A Plea for Both More and Less Focus.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (1): 362–372. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and T. Akkerman. 2017. “Flank Attacks: Populism and Left-Right Radicalism in Western Europe.” Party Politics 23 (3): 193–204. doi:10.1177/1354068815596514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., S. L. de Lange, and W. van der Brug. 2014. “A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe.” Party Politics 20 (4): 563–575. doi:10.1177/1354068811436065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and T. Pauwels. 2011. “Measuring Populism: Comparing two Methods of Content Analysis.” West European Politics 34 (6): 1272–1283. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.616665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., S. Van Kessel, C. Froio, A. Pirro, and S. L. de Lange. 2019. The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. http://www.popu-list.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rudin, C. 2019. “Stop Explaining Black box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and use Interpretable Models Instead.” Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (5): 206–215. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruedin, D., and L. Morales. 2017. “Estimating Party Positions on Immigration: Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Different Methods.” Party Politics 25 (3): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. J. 2014. “Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics.” The Journal of Politics 76 (2): 380–397. doi:10.1017/S0022381613001357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. J. 2017. “No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (2): 409–423. doi:10.1111/ajps.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte-Cloos, J. 2018. “Do European Parliament Elections Foster Challenger Parties’ Success on the National Level?” European Union Politics 19 (3): 408–426. doi:10.1177/1465116518773486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., P. Müller, C. Schemer, D. S. Wirz, M. Wettstein, and W. Wirth. 2017. “Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30 (2): 316–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B., and S.-O. Proksch. 2010. “Look Who’s Talking: Parliamentary Debate in the European Union.” European Union Politics 11 (3): 333–357. doi:10.1177/1465116510369266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J., S. Salgado, and J. Strömbäck. 2016. “Populist Actors as Communicators or Political Actors as Populist Communicators. Cross-National Findings and Perspectives.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, edited by T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, and C. H. de Vreese, 353–364. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., and A. Jäger. 2017. “Accomplishments and Limitations of the “new” Mainstream in Contemporary Populism Studies.” European Journal of Social Theory 21 (4): 547–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreese, C. H., F. de Esser, T. Aalberg, C. Reinemann, and J. Stanyer. 2018. “Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A new Perspective.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (4): 423–438. doi:10.1177/1940161218790035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, K. 2018. “Newsmap - a Semi-Supervised Approach to Geographical News Classification.” Digital Journalism 6 (3): 294–309. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1293487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, P. 1969. “A Syndrome, not a Doctrine.” In Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics, edited by G. Ionescu, and E. Gellner, 166–179. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zehnter, L. 2023. “Identity Through Distinction. Contextualizing in- and Outgroups in Populist Political Communication.” Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Zulianello, M., A. Albertini, and D. Ceccobelli. 2018. “A Populist Zeitgeist? The Communication Strategies of Western and Latin American Political Leaders on Facebook.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (4): 439–457. doi:10.1177/1940161218783836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar