What do we mean when we talk about constituency service? A scoping literature review of four decades of research

References

• Adler, E. S., C. E. Gent, and C. B. Overmeyer. 1998. “The Home Style Homepage: Legislator Use of the World Wide Web for Constituency Contact.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (4): 585–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/440242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnoson, J. T. 1983. “Home Style in New Zealand.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8 (2): 157–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/439426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnoson, J. T. 1991. “Home Style in New Zealand.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (3): 375–392. https://doi.org/10.2307/440103.
   Google Scholar
• André, A., J. Bradbury, and S. Depauw. 2014. “Constituency Service in Multi-Level Democracies.” Regional and Federal Studies 24 (2): 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2013.858708.
   Google Scholar
• André, A., and S. Depauw. 2013. “Electoral Competition and the Constituent-Representative Relationship.” World Political Science Review 9 (1): 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1515/wpsr-2013-0013.
   Google Scholar
• André, A., S. Depauw, and S. Martin. 2015. “Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (4): 464–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014545512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arter, D. 2018. “The What, Why’s and How’s of Constituency Service.” Representation 54 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2017.1396240.
   Google Scholar
• Bandau, F. 2022. “What Explains the Electoral Crisis of Social Democracy? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Government and Opposition 50 (1): 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.10.
   Google Scholar
• Bárcena Juárez, S. A., and Y. P. Kerevel. 2021. “Communicative Responsiveness in the Mexican Senate: A Field Experiment.” Democratization 28 (8): 1387–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1907348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, G., R. Marcella, and M. O’Shea. 2016. “Members of the Scottish Parliament on Twitter: Good Constituency Men (and Women)?” Aslib Journal of Information Management 68 (4): 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2016-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benstead, L. J. 2016. “Why Quotas Are Needed to Improve Women’s Access to Services in Clientelistic Regimes.” Governance 29 (2): 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghetto, E., J. Santana-Pereira, and A. Freire. 2020. “Parliamentary Questions as an Instrument for Geographic Representation: The Hard Case of Portugal.” Swiss Political Science Review 26 (1): 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J. 2007. “Conclusion.” Regional and Federal Studies 17 (1): 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560701189677.
   Google Scholar
• Brouard, S., O. Costa, E. Kerrouche, and T. Schnatterer. 2013. “Why Do French MPs Focus More on Constituency Work than on Parliamentary Work?” The Journal of Legislative Studies 19 (2): 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.787194.
   Google Scholar
• Bussell, J. 2019. Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. M., C. F. Karpowitz, and J. C. Pope. 2012. “A Field Experiment on Legislators Home Styles: Service Versus Policy.” Journal of Politics 74 (2): 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611001708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, B. E., J. A. Ferejohn, and M. P. Fiorina. 1984. “The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament.” The American Political Science Review 78 (1): 110–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, B., J. Ferejohn, and M. Fiorina. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., and J. Lovenduski. 2015. “What Should MPs Do? Public and Parliamentarians’ Views Compared.” Parliamentary Affairs 68 (4): 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsu020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42:264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiru, M. 2018. “The Electoral Value of Constituency-Oriented Parliamentary Questions in Hungary and Romania.” Parliamentary Affairs 71 (4): 950–969. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiru, M., and S. Gherghina. 2020. “National Games for Local Gains: Legislative Activity, Party Organization and Candidate Selection.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 30 (1): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1537280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciftci, S., and T. M. Yildirim. 2019. “Hiding Behind the Party Brand or Currying Favor with Constituents: Why Do Representatives Engage in Different Types of Constituency-Oriented Behavior?” Party Politics 25 (3): 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817720438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, O., and C. Poyet. 2016. “Back to Their Roots: French MPs in Their District.” French Politics 14 (4): 406–438. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-016-0014-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, E. 2021. An Anthropology of Parliaments. Entanglements in Democratic Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. F., and W. M. Simoneau. 2017. “Electoral Systems and Constituency Service.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, edited by E. S. Herron, R. J. Pekkanen, and M. S. Shugart, 345–363. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dacombe, R. 2018. “Systematic Reviews in Political Science: What Can the Approach Contribute to Political Research?” Political Studies Review 16 (2): 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916680641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demarest, L. 2021. “Elite Clientelism in Nigeria: The Role of Parties in Weakening Legislator-Voter Ties.” Party Politics 28 (5): 939–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211030219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distelhorst, G., and Y. Hou. 2017. “Constituency Service Under Nondemocratic Rule: Evidence from China.” Journal of Politics 79 (3): 1024–1040. https://doi.org/10.1086/690948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockendorff, A. 2020. “When Do Legislators Respond to Their Constituencies in Party Controlled Assemblies? Evidence from Chile.” Parliamentary Affairs 73 (2): 408–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovi, S. 2015. “Hanna Pitkin, the Concept of Representation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory, edited by J. T. Levy, 1–15. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellickson, M. C., and D. E. Whistler. 2001. “Explaining State Legislators’ Casework and Public Resource Allocations.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, H., and P. D. Karps. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/439340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. F. 1978. Home Style. House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• François, A., and J. Navarro. 2019. “Voters Reward Hard-Working MPs: Empirical Evidence from the French Legislative Elections.” European Political Science Review 11 (4): 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, C. E. S. 2007. “Members and Constituency Roles in the Canadian Federal System.” Regional and Federal Studies 17 (1): 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560701189602.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Patricia K., and Lilliard E. Richardson. 1996. “Explaining Variation in Casework among State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21 (1): 41–56. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/440157. Accessed 9 July 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T., and W. C. Wilson. 2019. “New Media for the New Electorate? Congressional Outreach to Latinos on Twitter.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (2): 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1358186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giger, N., S. Lanz, and C. De Vries. 2020. “The Motivational Basis of Constituency Work: How Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations Interact.” Political Science Research and Methods 8 (3): 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, M. A. 2003. “Electoral Connections: The Effects of the Personal Vote on Political Patronage, Bureaucracy and Legislation in Postwar Italy.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000085.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, M., and B. Min. 2013. “Distributive Politics Around the World.” Annual Review of Political Science 16 (1): 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-121553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel, P., and S. Birch. 2019. “A Field Experiment on the Effects of Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status on the Quality of Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44 (3): 389–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, T. J., and B. G. Bishin. 2024. “Do Elected Officials Serve the Poor on Health Care? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Members of Congress and State Legislators.” Social Science Journal 61 (1): 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1783963.
   Google Scholar
• Heitshusen, V., G. Young, and D. M. Wood. 2005. “Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00108.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. A., and D. G. Lilleker. 2004. “Just Public Relations or an Attempt at Interaction?: British MPs in the Press, on the Web and ‘in Your Face.” European Journal of Communication 19 (4): 507–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104047671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N., and D. Lilleker. 2011. “Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter.” Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (1): 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.545181.
   Google Scholar
• Kartalis, Y. 2023. “Parliamentary Current Questions’ Constituency Focus Under Times of Crisis: An Examination of the Greek Case.” Journal of Legislative Studies 29 (2): 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2021.1977897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellermann, M. 2013. “Sponsoring Early Day Motions in the British House of Commons as a Response to Electoral Vulnerability.” Political Science Research and Methods 1 (2): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2013.19.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., S. Krishnan, and A. Dhir. 2021. “Electronic Government and Corruption: Systematic Literature Review, Framework, and Agenda for Future Research.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167:120737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, R. 2012. “Party Constituency Associations and the Service, Policy and Symbolic Responsiveness of Canadian Members of Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423912000364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T. D. 1986. “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics.” International Political Science Review 7 (1): 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218600700107.
   Google Scholar
• Landgrave, M. 2021. “Do Politicians Ethnically Discriminate Against Hispanics? Evidence from a Field Experiment with State Legislative Offices.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, J., M. Levendusky, K. Winneg, and K. H. Jamieson. 2016. “What Do Citizens Want from Their Member of Congress?” Political Research Quarterly 69 (3): 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916652240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gøtzsche, J. P. Ioannidis, M. Clarke, P. J. Devereaux, J. Kleijnen, and D. Moher. 2009. “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration.” PLoS Medicine 6 (7): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. I. 2010. “What Accountability Pressures Do MPs in Africa Face and How do They Respond? Evidence from Ghana.” Journal of Modern African Studies 48 (1): 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X09990243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisi, M., R. Oliveira, and J. Loureiro. 2023. “Looking for Ariadne’s Thread: A Systematic Review on Party-Group Relations in the Last 20 Years.” Politics 43 (4): 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211030399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangi, S. N., B. A. Soomro, and A. R. Larik. 2021. “Rich Men’s Club. A Case Study of the National Assembly of Pakistan, 1970–2008.” Parliaments, Estates and Representation 41 (1): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2021.1877880.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2011. “Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case.” Political Studies 59 (2): 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00885.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2013. “Is All Politics Local? The Role-Orientation of Irish Parliamentarians Towards Foreign Policy.” Irish Political Studies 28 (1): 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2012.746956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcadams, J. C., and J.R. Johannes. 1988. “Congressmen, Perquisites, and Elections.” Journal of Politics 50 (2): 412–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, L. 2020. “Does Constituency Focus Improve Attitudes to MPs? A Test for the UK.” Journal of Legislative Studies 26 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1726635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, A. 2019. “The Personal Vote, Electoral Experience, and Local Connections: Explaining Retirement Underperformance at UK Elections 1987–2010.” Politics 39 (2): 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718754717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miler, K. C. 2007. “The View from the Hill: Legislative Perceptions of the District.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 597–628. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007782398477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljand, M. 2020. “Using Systematic Review Methods to Evaluate Environmental Public Policy: Methodological Challenges and Potential Usefulness.” Environmental Science and Policy 105:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., M. D. Peters, C. Stern, C. Tufanaru, A. McArthur, and E. Aromataris. 2018. “Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing Between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach.” Medical Research Methodology 18 (143): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Neihouser, M. 2023. “Representation Style and Digital Communication: The Case of the Online Presence of French MPs Elected in 2017.” Journal of Legislative Studies 29 (1): 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2021.1941544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 1996. “The Nolan Committee: Financial Interests and Constituency Service.” Government and Opposition 31 (4): 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1996.tb01200.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 1997. “The Puzzle of Constituency Service.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 3 (2): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420508.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, E. 2011. “The Constituency Orientation of Modern TDs.” Irish Political Studies 26 (3): 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2011.593737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, E. 2015. “Complementary Institutions in Authoritarian Regimes: The Everyday Politics of Constituency Service in Singapore.” Journal of East Asian Studies 15 (3): 361–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800009115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opalo, K. O. 2022. “Formalizing Clientelism in Kenya from Harambee to the Constituency Development Fund.” World Development 152:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp, Z. 2015. “Campaign-Personalization and Constituency Focus in a Mixed-Member Electoral System. The Case of Hungary.” World Political Science 11:75–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/wps-2015-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. W. 1988. “Constituency Representation in Korea: Sources and Consequences.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (2): 225–242. https://doi.org/10.2307/439823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, D. D. 2003. “The Choosers or the Choices? Voter Characteristics and the Structure of Electoral Competition as Explanations for Ticket Splitting.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1147–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M., and J. Bradbury. 2007. “The Constituency Work of Scottish and Welsh MPs: Adjusting to Devolution.” Regional and Federal Studies 17 (1): 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560701189644.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F. 2011. “The Constituency as a Focus of Representation: Studying the Italian Case Through the Analysis of Parliamentary Questions.” Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595122.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F. 2021. “Going Local: Parliamentary Questions as a Means of Territorial Representation in the Italian Parliament.” Political Studies Review 19 (3): 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920986798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions as Instruments Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10.” Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595121.
   Google Scholar
• Sanches, E. R., and Y. Kartalis. 2024. “Constituency Focus in Party-Centered Systems: How Individual, Party, and District-Level Factors Shape Parliamentary Questions in South Africa.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/lsq.12453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searing, D. D. 1985. “The Role of the Good Constituency Member and the Practice of Representation in Great Britain.” The Journal of Politics 47 (2): 348–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., M. E. Valdini, and K. Suominen. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators Under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 437–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somfalvy, E. 2021. “The Challenges to De-Localising Constituencies Through Electoral Reform in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.” Europe – Asia Studies 73 (3): 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1840518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struthers, C. L. 2018. “The Enduring Influence of Electoral Systems: Investigating Green Parties’ Attention to Local Issues in Parliament.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 56 (4): 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2018.1470157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studlar, D. T., and I. Mcallister. 1996. “Constituency Activity and Representational Roles among Australian Legislators.” The Journal of Politics 58 (1): 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkin, T., P. Testa, and K. Usry. 2015. “What Gets Rewarded? Legislative Activity and Constituency Approval.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (4): 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915608699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, W. A., and R. F. Durant. 1985. “Home Style of a U.S. Senator: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (4): 489–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/440071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. M. 1992. “Formal Versus Informal Incentive Structures and Legislator Behavior: Evidence from Costa Rica.” The Journal of Politics 54 (4): 1055–1073. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. 1992. “The Effects of Race and Gender on Constituency Service.” Western Political Quarterly 45 (1): 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299204500.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. A. 2002. “The First Decade of Post-Communist Elections and Voting: What Have We Studied, and How Have We Studied It?” Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1): 271–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.100201.102917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivyan, N., and M. Wagner. 2015. “What Do Voters Want from Their Local MP?” Political Quarterly 86 (1): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanyama, S. B., R. W. McQuaid, and M. Kittler. 2022. “Where You Search Determines What You Find: The Effects of Bibliographic Databases on Systematic Reviews.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 25 (3): 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1892378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. 2021. “Politics as Social Work: A Qualitative Study of Emplaced Empathy and Risk Work by British Members of Parliament.” British Journal of Social Work 51 (8): 3248–3264. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. L. 2020. “Duelling Networks: Relational Clientelism in Electoral-Authoritarian Malaysia.” Democratization 27 (1): 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1625889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, T. M. 2020. “Politics of Constituency Representation and Legislative Ambition Under the Glare of Camera Lights.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar