Going negative when spoiled for choice? Destabilizing and boomerang effects of negative political messaging in multiparty systems with multimember districts

References

• Alvarez, R. M., L. R. Atkeson, I. Levin, and Y. Li. 2019. “Paying Attention to Inattentive Survey Respondents.” Political Analysis 27 (2): 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., S. Iyengar, A. Simon, and N. Valentino. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review 88 (4): 829–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlow, J, and E O'Malley. 2024. “Ireland: Political Developments and Data in 2023.” European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2047-8852.12457
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., M. B. Brewer, and J. M. Carlsmith. 1985. “Experimentation in Social Psychology.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., edited by G. Lindzey, and E. Aronson, 99–142. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Banda, K. K., and J. H. Windett. 2016. “Negative Advertising and the Dynamics of Candidate Support.” Political Behavior 38 (3): 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9336-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauluz, L., A. Gethin, C. Martinez-Toledano, and M. Morgan. 2021. “Historical Political Cleavages and Post-Crisis Transformations in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, 1953–2020.” https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03131155/.
   Google Scholar
• Belt, T. L. 2017. “Negative Advertising.” In Routledge Handbook of Political Advertising, edited by C. Holtz-Bacha and M. R. Just, 49–60. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., and M. Marsh. 2003. “For a few Euros More: Campaign Spending Effects in the Irish Local Elections of 1999.” Party Politics 9 (5): 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688030095003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., and M. Marsh. 2008. “The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 874–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., and M. Marsh. 2010. “Incumbent and Challenger Campaign Spending Effects in Proportional Electoral Systems: The Irish Elections of 2002.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (1): 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908325081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadcasting Association of Ireland. 2018. Rule 27 Guidelines: Guidelines for Coverage of General, Presidential, Seanad, Local and European Elections.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., and J. G. Geer. 2007. “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carraro, L., and L. Castelli. 2010. “The Implicit and Explicit Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: Is the Source Really Blamed?” Political Psychology 31 (4): 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00771.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carraro, L., B. Gawronski, and L. Castelli. 2010. “Losing on all Fronts: The Effects of Negative Versus Positive Person-Based Campaigns on Implicit and Explicit Evaluations of Political Candidates.” British Journal of Social Psychology 49 (3): 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X468042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. 2001. “The Impacts of Emotion Elicited by Print Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluation.” Media Psychology 3 (2): 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0302_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., G. Sheagley, and S. Piston. 2021. “Increasing Precision Without Altering Treatment Effects: Repeated Measures Designs in Survey Experiments.” American Political Science Review 115 (3): 1048–1065. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coakley, J., M. Gallagher, E. O' Malley, and T. Reidy. 2023. “The Context of Irish Politics.” In Politics in the Republic of Ireland, edited by J. Coakley, M. Gallagher, E. O' Malley, and T. Reidy, 1–94. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K., and J. A. Elkink. 2018. “Ideological Dimensions in the 2016 Elections.” In The Post-crisis Irish Voter: Voting Behaviour in the Irish 2016 General Election, edited by M. Marsh, D.M. Farrell, and T. Reidy, 33–62. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K., and M. Marsh. 2021. “Voting Behaviour: The Sinn Féin Election.” In How Ireland Voted 2020: The End of an Era, edited by M. Gallagher, M. Marsh, and T. Reidy, 219–254. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Nooy, W., and J. Kleinnijenhuis. 2015. “Attack, Support, and Coalitions in a Multiparty System: Understanding Negative Campaigning in a Country with a Coalition Government.” In New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning. Why Attack Politics Matter, edited by A. Nai, and A. S. Walter, 77–93. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., and C. D. Kam. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski, and A Lupia, 41–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, A., and C. Milazzo. 2023. “Going on the Offensive: Negative Messaging in British General Elections.” Electoral Studies 83 (102600).
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. 1963. Political Parties: Their Organisation and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Elkink, J., and D. Farrell. 2020. “2020 UCD Online Election Poll (INES 1).” Harvard Dataverse, V4.
   Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C. 2008. “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System.” Representation 44 (1): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890701869082
   Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C. 2010. “Beyond American Negativity: Toward a General Understanding of the Determinants of Negative Campaigning.” European Political Science Review 2 (01): 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909990269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M. 2011. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, Kim L, and Patrick Kenney. 2011. “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 307–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasso, V., T. Nannicini, and S. Nunnari. 2023. “Positive Spillovers from Negative Campaigning.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. 2021. “The Results Analysed: The Definitive End of the Traditional Party System?” In How Ireland Voted 2020: The End of an Era, edited by M. Gallagher, M. Marsh, and T. Reidy, 165–196. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. 2023. "The Electoral System and Its Political Consequences." In Politics in the Republic of Ireland edited by J. Coakley, M. Gallagher, E. O' Malley, and T. Reidy, 97–127. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., and P. Mitchell, eds. 2005. The Politics of Electoral Systems. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garramone, G. M. 1984. “Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads.” Journalism Quarterly 61 (2): 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garramone, G. M., C. K. Atkin, B. E. Pinkleton, and R. T. Cole. 1990. “Effects of Negative Political Advertising on the Political Process.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 34 (3): 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159009386744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, B. B., and J. Bowers. 2008. “Covariate Balance in Simple, Stratified and Clustered Comparative Studies.” Statistical Science 23 (2): 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-STS254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., and R. T. Pedersen. 2008. “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (4): 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, M. 2019. “Negative Campaigning and its Consequences: A Review and a Look Ahead.” French Politics 17(3): 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-019-00084-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, M., L. Hirsch, and M. Jenny. 2020. “Love is Blind. Partisanship and Perception of Negative Campaign Messages in a Multiparty System.” Political Research Exchange 2 (1): 180600. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2020.1806002
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., R. Vliegenthart, and J. Maier. 2018. “The Effects of Tone, Focus, and Incivility in Election Debates.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28 (3): 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1394310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irish Polling Indicator. 2024. https://pollingindicator.com/
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J.-H., and M. Tavits. 2021. “Valence Attacks Harm the Electoral Performance of the Left but not the Right.” The Journal of Politics 83 (1): 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1086/709299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K., and P. J. Kenney. 2004. No Holds Barred: Negativity in U.S. Senate Campaigns. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R., and T. R. Palfrey, eds. 1993. Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y. 2011. “When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (4): 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y. 2014. “How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout: The Effect of Timing.” Political Communication 31 (3): 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.828141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R., and G. Pomper. 2002. “Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R., L. Sigelman, C. Heldman, and P. Babbitt. 1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment.” American Political Science Review 93 (4): 851–875. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R., L. Sigelman, and I. B. Rovner. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1176–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, P. 2021. “Campaign Strategies: The Inside Story of How the Election was Fought.” In How Ireland Voted 2020: The End of an Era, edited by M. Gallagher, M. Marsh, and T. Reidy, 71–92. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., M. MacKuen, and W. R. Neuman. 2011. “Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence.” Political Psychology 32 (2): 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. 2000. “Candidate Centered but Party Wrapped: Campaigning in Ireland Under STV.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta Under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution, edited by S. Bowler, and B. Grofman, 114–130. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. 2004. “None of That Post-Modern Stuff Around Here: Grassroots Campaigning in the 2002 Irish General Election.” British Elections & Parties Review 14 (1): 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1368988042000258862
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. 2007. “Candidates or Parties? Objects of Electoral Choice in Ireland.” Party Politics 13 (4): 500–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807075944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, K., and D. P. Redlawsk. 2014. The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, H., D. Raleigh, and C. Keena. 2020. “Micheál Martin Promises First-time Buyer Saving Scheme if Elected.” Irish Times, January 19. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/miche%C3%A1l-martin-promises-first-time-buyer-saving-scheme-if-elected-1.4144402.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P., A. Nai, and L. Bos. 2024. “The Fleeting Allure of Dark Campaigns: Backlash from Negative and Uncivil Campaigning in the Presence of (Better) Alternatives.” Political Communication, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2314604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. 1984. “Negative Political Advertising: Some Empirical Findings.” Journal of Advertising 13 (3): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1984.10672899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, S., and T. Louwerse. 2020. “The Electoral Cycle Effect in Parliamentary Democracies.” Political Science Research and Methods 8 (4): 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, S., and A. Regan. 2021. “Are Irish Voters Moving to the Left?” Irish Political Studies 36 (4): 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.1973737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. 2015. In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A. 2020. “Going Negative, Worldwide: Towards a General Understanding of Determinants and Targets of Negative Campaigning.” Government and Opposition 55 (3): 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A., and J. Maier. 2021. “Is Negative Campaigning a Matter of Taste? Political Attacks, Incivility, and the Moderating Role of Individual Differences.” American Politics Research 49 (3): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20965548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A., and L. P. Otto. 2021. “When They Go Low, We Gloat: How Trait and State Schadenfreude Moderate the Perception and Effect of Negative Political Messages.” Journal of Media Psychology 33 (2): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A., and A. S. Walter. 2015. “The War of Words: The Art of Negative Campaigning. Why Attack Politics Matter.” In New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning. Why Attack Politics Matter, edited by A. Nai, and A. S. Walter, 3–33. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pattie, Charles, David Denver, Robert Johns, and James Mitchell. 2011. “Raising the tone? The Impact of ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ Campaigning on Voting in the 2007 Scottish Parliament Election.” Electoral Studies 30 (2): 333–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. M., J. E. Urbany, and T. J. Reynolds. 2008. “Confirmation and the Effects of Valenced Political Advertising: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Consumer Research 34 (6): 794–806. https://doi.org/10.1086/523287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkelton, B. E. 1997. “The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations: An Exploration.” Journal of Advertising 26 (1): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljak, Ž. 2023. “The Impact of Public Approval on the Use of Negativity Throughout the Electoral Cycle.” West European Politics 46 (5): 947–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2095487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaper, Luke. 2023. "Behaviour and Attitudes TechScape 2023." https://banda.ie/ba-techscape-2023/
   Google Scholar
• Ridout, T. N., and K. Searles. 2011. “It's My Campaign I'll Cry if I Want to: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals.” Political Psychology 32 (3): 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00819.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roddy, B. L., and G. M. Garramone. 1988. “Appeals and Strategies of Negative Political Advertising.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 32 (4): 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158809386713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, J., and C. Alcantara. 2016. “Fighting Fire with Fire: The Implications of (not) Going Negative in a Multiparty Election Campaign.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423916000548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, P. 2020. “Fine Gael Research Candidates Asked How to Attack Sinn Féin.” Irish Indepedent, November 12. https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/fine-gael-research-candidates-asked-how-to-attack-sinn-Féin-39736985.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D., and P. Norris. 2005. “The Impact of Political Advertising in the 2001 U.K. General Election.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (4): 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, H. B., and A. Nai. 2021. “Undermining a Rival Party’s Issue Competence Through Negative Campaigning: Experimental Evidence from the USA, Denmark, and Australia.” Political Studies 69 (3): 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaperdas, S., and B. Grofman. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89 (1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2083074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Z., and D. Weitzel. 2022. “Negative Campaigning and Vote Choice in Europe: How Do Different Partisan Groups React to Campaign Attacks?” Comparative Political Studies 55 (13): 2283–2310. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140221074283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sudulich, M. L., and M. Wall. 2010. ““Every Little Helps”: Cyber-campaigning in the 2007 Irish General Election.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7 (4): 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903473485
   Google Scholar
• Sudulich, M. L., and M. Wall. 2011. “How do Candidates Spend Their Money? Objects of Campaign Spending and the Effectiveness of Diversification.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C., and M. Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valli, C., and A. Nai. 2022. “Attack Politics from Albania to Zimbabwe: A Large-scale Comparative Study on the Drivers of Negative Campaigning.” International Political Science Review 43 (5): 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120946410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Annemarie S. 2014. “Negative Campaigning in Western Europe: Similar or Different?.” Political Studies 62 (1_suppl): 42–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12084
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., and A. Nai. 2015. New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, 97–114. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., and W. van der Brug. 2013. “When the Gloves Come off: Inter-party Variation in Negative Campaigning in Dutch Elections, 1981–2010.” Acta Politica 48 (4): 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2013.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., and C. van der Eijk. 2019. “Unintended Consequences of Negative Campaigning: Backlash and Second-Preference Boost Effects in a Multi-party Context.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21 (3): 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119842038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. 2015. “Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation.” Journal of Communication 65 (4): 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar