Should Ultrasound Guidance Be Routinely Used for Femoral Artery Access?

References

• Irani F, Kumar S, Colyer WR Jr. Common femoral artery access techniques: a review. J Cardiovas Med. 2009;10:517–522. doi:10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832a1e00
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett PD, Eckart RE, Bauch TD, Thompson CM, Stajduhar KC. Fluoroscopic localization of the femoral head as a landmark for common femoral artery cannulation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;65:205–207. doi:10.1002/ccd.20373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turi ZG. Optimal femoral access prevents complications. Cardiac Interventions Today. 2008;1:35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Seto AH, Tyler J, Suh WM, et al. Defining the common femoral artery: insights from the femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89:1185–1192. doi:10.1002/ccd.26727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitta SR, Prasad A, Kumar G, Lennon R, Rihal CS, Holmes DR. Location of femoral artery access and correlation with vascular complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:294–299. doi:10.1002/ccd.v78.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MS, Applegate B, Rao SV, Kirtane AJ, Seto A, Stone GW. Minimizing femoral artery access complications during percutaneous coronary intervention: a comprehensive review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:62–69. doi:10.1002/ccd.25435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis SG, Bhatt D, Kapadia S, Lee D, Yen M, Whitlow PL. Correlates and outcomes of retroperitoneal hemorrhage complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:541–545. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1522-726X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farouque HM, Tremmel JA, Raissi Shabari F, et al. Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:363–368. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiroch KA, Arora N, Matheny ME, Liu C, Lee TC, Resnic FS. Risk predictors of retroperitoneal hemorrhage following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:1473–1476. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent KC, Moscucci M, Mansour KA, et al. Retroperitoneal hematoma after cardiac catheterization: prevalence, risk factors, and optimal management. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:905–910, discussion 910–913.doi:10.1016/0741-5214(94)90227-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley P. A retrospective study of the management of retro-peritoneal bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of combination anti-platelet therapy. J Cardiovas Med. 2008;9:56–58. doi:10.2459/JCM.0b013e32801494f7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altin RS, Flicker S, Naidech HJ. Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after femoral artery catheterization: association with low femoral punctures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:629–631. doi:10.2214/ajr.152.3.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Orron DE, Skillman JJ, et al. Role of superficial femoral artery puncture in the development of pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula complicating percutaneous transfemoral cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;25:91–97. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810250203
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad F, Turner SA, Torrie P, Gibson M. Iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysms–a review of current methods of diagnosis and treatment. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:1310–1316. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenschlager R, Ugurluoglu A, Ahmadi A, et al. Incidence of pseudoaneurysm after diagnostic and therapeutic angiography. Radiology. 1995;195:463–466. doi:10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus H, Rollo V, Zvonimir K. Percutaneous access and closure of femoral artery access sites associated with endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:68–74. doi:10.1177/152660280100800112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfors B, Watson BM, McAndrew T, et al. Mortality, length of stay, and cost implications of procedural bleeding after percutaneous interventions using large-bore catheters. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:798–802. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts J, Ver Lee P, Hofmaster P, Malenka D. Northern New England Cardiovascular Study G. Fluoroscopy-guided femoral artery puncture reduces the risk of PCI-related vascular complications. J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21:273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, et al. Fluoroscopy vs. traditional guided femoral arterial access and the use of closure devices: a randomized controlled trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74:533–539. doi:10.1002/ccd.22174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins CE, Gillespie MJ, Tan WA, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of the use of fluoroscopy in obtaining femoral arterial access. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21:105–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi JA, Schussler JM, Johnson KB. Routine femoral head fluoroscopy to reduce complications in coronary catheterization. Proc (Baylor Univ Med Center). 2009;22:7–8. doi:10.1080/08998280.2009.11928457
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2003;327:361. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soverow J, Oyama J, Lee MS. Adoption of routine ultrasound guidance for femoral arterial access for cardiac catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28:311–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AIUM practice guideline for the use of ultrasound to guide vascular access procedures. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:191–215. doi:10.7863/jum.2013.32.1.191.
   Google Scholar
• Stegemann E, Stegemann B, Marx N, Lauer T, Hoffmann R. Effect of preinterventional ultrasound examination on frequency of procedure-related vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions with transfemoral approach. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1203–1206. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudeck O, Teichgraeber U, Podrabsky P, Haenninen EL, Soerensen R, Ricke J. A randomized trial assessing the value of ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery for interventional investigations. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004;20:363–368. doi:10.1023/B:CAIM.0000041949.59255.3f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:751–758. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckridge PJ, Spark JI, Thompson W. The use of ultrasound to assist deployment of the starclose vascular closure device in arterial access sites. Eur J Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009;38:88–90. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucevic M, Tehan B, Gamlin F, Berridge JC, Boylan M. The SMART needle. A new Doppler ultrasound-guided vascular access needle. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:889–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank R, Rupprecht HJ, Schorrlepp M, Kopp H, Rahmani R. [Clinical value of Doppler ultrasound controlled puncture of the inguinal vessels with the “Smart Needle” within the scope of heart catheter examination]. Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie. 1997;86:608–614. doi:10.1007/s003920050100
   Google Scholar
• Samal AK, White CJ. Percutaneous management of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovas Interv. 2002;57:12–23. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1522-726X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T. van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269–1275. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00064-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauernschmitt R, Schreiber C, Bleiziffer S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation through the ascending aorta: an alternative option for no-access patients. Heart Surg Forum. 2009:E63–E64. doi:10.1532/HSF98.20081112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum AB, O’Neill WW, Paone G, et al. Caval-aortic access to allow transcatheter aortic valve replacement in otherwise ineligible patients: initial human experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2795–2804. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong HD, Hunter G, Lotun K, et al. Insertion of the Impella via the axillary artery for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2018. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride LR, Miller LW, Naunheim KS, Perinington DG. Axillary artery insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:874–875. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(89)90694-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar